U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-11-058    Date:  December 2011
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-11-058
Date: December 2011

 

Investigation of Low and High Temperature Properties of Plant Produced Rap Mixtures

REFERENCES

  1. Shah, A., McDaniel, R.S., Huber, G.A., and Gallivan, V.L. (2007). “Investigation of Properties of Plant-Produced RAP Mixtures,” Transportation Research Record 1998, 103–111, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  2. McDaniel, R., Soleymani, H., and Shah, A. (2002). Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Under Superpave Specifications: A Regional Pooled Fund Project, North Central Superpave Center, West Lafayette, IN.

  3. McDaniel, R.S. and Shah, A. (2008). Investigation of Low and High Temperature Properties of Plant-Produced RAP Mixtures: Phase II Work Plan, Contract No. DTFH61-08-P-00165, North Central Superpave Center, West Lafayette, IN.

  4. AASHTO M 323. (2007). Standard Specification for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  5. McDaniel, R.S., Soleymani, H., Anderson, R.M., Turner, P. and Peterson, R. (2000). Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method, Web Document 30, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w30-a.pdf. Site last accessed August 29, 2011.

  6. AASHTO R 35. (2009). Standard Practice for Superpave Volumetric Design for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  7. Superpave Mixture Expert Task Group. (1997). Guidelines for the Design of Superpave Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP), 5, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  8. Schroer, J. (2007). Asphalt Shingles in HMA: Missouri DOT Experience, Presentation at NCAUPG North Central Hot Mix Asphalt Technical Conference, Springfield, IL. Obtained from: http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~spave/NCAUPG/Activities/2007/Presentations/Schroer%20MoDOT%20-%20Asphalt%20Shingles%20in%20HMA.pdf. Site last accessed August 29, 2011.

  9. Ordorff, D. (2007). RAP & Recycling of Asphalt Shingles: A Contractor’s Experience, Presentation at North Central Asphalt User/Producer Group North Central Hot Mix Asphalt Technical Conference, Spingfield, IL. Obtained from: http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~spave/NCAUPG/Activities/2007/Presentations/Ordorff%20Recycling%20Shingles.pdf. Site last accessed August 29, 2011.

  10. Bonaquist, R. (2005). New Approach for the Design of High RAP HMA, Presentation at NEAUPG Meeting, Burlington, VT. Obtained from: www.neaupg.uconn.edu/pdf/neaupg_oct2005_bonaquist.pdf. Site last accessed December 20, 2010.

  11. Bonaquist, R. (2007). “Can I Run More RAP?,” Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, 12(5), National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham MD.

  12. Christensen, D., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R. (2003). “Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 97–121.

  13. AASHTO T 209. (2009). Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  14. AASHTO T 166. (2007). Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  15. AASHTO T 312. (2009). Preparing and Determining the Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  16. AASHTO M 320. (2009). Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  17. AASHTO T 315. (2009). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR),  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  18. AASHTO T 313. (2009). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  19. AASHTO T 240. (2009). Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  20. AASHTO R 28. (2007). Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  21. AAASHTO TP 62. (2009). Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)—Revision 1, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  22. AASHTO T 322. (2007). Determining the Creep Compliance and Strength of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Indirect Tensile Test Device, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  23. AASHTO T 319. (2008). Quantitative Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  24. AASHTO T 170. (2000). Recovery of Asphalt from Solution by Abson Method, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  25. AASHTO T 164. (2008). Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  26. Galal, K., White, T.D., and Hand, A. (2000). Second Phase Study of Changes in In-Service Asphalt, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-99/07Joint Transportation Research Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

  27. Christensen, D. (1998). “Analysis of Creep Data from Indirect Tension Test on Asphalt Concrete,” Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 67, 458–492, St. Paul, MN.

  28. Hou, T., Underwood, B.S., and Kim, Y.R. (2010). “Fatigue Performance Prediction of North Carolina Mixtures Using the Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 80, 35–80.

  29. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). “AASHTO TP 79: Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for HMA Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT),” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.

 

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101