U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
REPORT |
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-16-047 Date: January 2017 |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-16-047 Date: January 2017 |
PDF Version of Errata (244 KB)
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
Date: | September 5, 2017 |
Issuing Office: | Federal Highway Administration–Office of Infrastructure Research, Development, and Technology |
Address: | Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, McLean, VA 22101 |
Name of Document: | Pavement Performance Measures and Forecasting and the Effects of Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy on Treatment Effectiveness |
FHWA Publication No.: | FHWA-HRT-16-047 |
This report was revised under the following title, Pavement Performance Measures and Forecasting and the Effects of Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy on Treatment Effectiveness (Revised) (FHWA-HRT-17-095), available at www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/17095/index.cfm.
The following changes were made to the document after publication on the Federal Highway Administration website:
Location: page 244, table 109: Table was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Deflection Sensor |
Distance from FWD load (inches) |
Regression Terms and Values | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
αi (E−05) | βi (E−03) | γi | ||
d1 | 0 | 7.09 | −18.24 | 1.930 |
d2 | 8 | 3.72 | −10.62 | 1.562 |
d3 | 12 | 2.45 | −7.33 | 1.394 |
d4 | 18 | 1.59 | −4.44 | 1.233 |
d5 | 24 | 1.37 | −3.00 | 1.143 |
d6 | 36 | 1.65 | −2.04 | 1.062 |
d7 | 60 | 1.83 | −2.18 | 1.062 |
1 inch = 25.4 mm. |
Location: page 245, table 110: Table was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Regression Parameter | Regression Value | ||
---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |
α1 | −1.429E−09 | — | — |
α2 | — | 2.293E−07 | — |
α3 | — | — | 4.839E−04 |
β1 | 1.631E−07 | — | — |
β2 | — | −2.964E−05 | — |
β3 | — | — | −4.232E−02 |
γ1 | −5.516E−06 | — | — |
γ2 | — | 1.221E−03 | — |
γ3 | — | — | 1.881 |
δ1 | 7.086E−05 | — | — |
δ2 | — | −1.831E−02 | — |
—Indicates not applicable. |
Location: page 248, table 111: Table was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Regression Term | Average Regression Value for Each Climatic Region | Overall Average | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WF | WNF | DF | DNF | ||
α1 | −1.94E−09 | −1.27E−09 | −8.70E−10 | −1.63E−09 | −1.43E−09 |
α2 | 2.82E−07 | 2.18E−07 | 1.62E−07 | 2.49E−07 | 2.29E−07 |
α3 | 6.73E−04 | 4.04E−04 | 3.23E−04 | 5.58E−04 | 4.84E−04 |
β1 | 2.34E−07 | 1.39E−07 | 9.97E−08 | 1.75E−07 | 1.63E−07 |
β2 | −3.88E−05 | −2.67E−05 | −2.05E−05 | −3.21E−05 | −2.96E−05 |
β3 | −5.74E−02 | −3.55E−02 | −3.00E−02 | −4.88E−02 | −4.23E−02 |
γ1 | −8.35E−06 | −4.24E−06 | −3.71E−06 | −5.71E−06 | −5.52E−06 |
γ2 | 1.67E−03 | 1.03E−03 | 8.69E−04 | 1.34E−03 | 1.22E−03 |
γ3 | 2.19 | 1.65 | 1.90 | 1.85 | 1.88 |
δ1 | 1.07E−04 | 4.61E−05 | 6.81E−05 | 6.73E−05 | 7.09E−05 |
δ2 | −2.54E−02 | −1.32E−02 | −1.82E−02 | −1.77E−02 | −1.83E−02 |
Location: page 252, figure 83: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 252, figure 84: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 253, figure 85: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 256, figure 86: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 256, figure 87: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 257, figure 88: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 257, figure 89: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
Location: page 258, figure 90: Figure was replaced in its entirety with the following:
“How effective will a particular treatment be on this roadway?” Data from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program have supported efforts to answer this question. This report documents work to advance the development of pavement performance measures to classify pavement sections, estimate future pavement conditions, evaluate the effectiveness of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation treatments, and analyze the role of pavement treatment strategies in extending pavement life.
Data from the various LTPP experiments were analyzed to define pavement performance in a way that supports the selection of cost-effective pavement treatment strategies. The research approach and results are presented in this report, including 1) the newly developed dual (functional and structural) pavement rating systems and their impact on pavement management, 2) the impacts of pavement preservation actions on pavement performance and longevity, 3) the effects of various pavement design parameters and climatic factors on pavement performance, 4)the aspects of a newly developed global model to accurately adjust the measured pavement deflections, and 5) the elements of a new statistical model to predict future pavement condition and distress based on a single data point.
This report can be used by pavement researchers, teachers in academic and lifelong (continuing) education settings, practicing engineers and contractors involved in pavement preservation, and road owners to develop cost-effective pavement preservation strategies.
Cheryl Allen Richter
Director, Office of Infrastructure
Research, Development, and Technology
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No.
FHWA-HRT-16-047 |
2. Government Accession No. | 3 Recipient's Catalog No. | ||
4. Title and Subtitle
Pavement Performance Measures and Forecasting and the Effects of Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy on Treatment Effectiveness |
5. Report Date January 2017 |
|||
6. Performing Organization Code | ||||
7. Author(s)
Gilbert Y. Baladi, Ph.D., P.E.; Tyler Dawson, Ph.D., P.E.; Gopikrishna Musunuru; Michael Prohaska; and Kyle Thomas |
8. Performing Organization Report No.
|
|||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Michigan State University |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) |
|||
11. Contract or Grant No.
DTFH-6113-C-00023 |
||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address
Federal Highway Administration |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
Final Report |
|||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
|
||||
15. Supplementary Notes
The Federal Highway Administration Contracting Officer’s Representative was Yan “Jane” Jiang. |
||||
16. Abstract
New and innovative pavement performance measures and rating systems were developed and successfully implemented using pavement condition and distress data obtained from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database and the databases of three State transportation departments—Colorado Department of Transportation, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, and Washington State Department of Transportation. The new systems were used to calculate the benefits of various pavement treatments, determine the impacts of the pavement conditions in climatic regions on pavement performance, and assess the effects of design variables on pavement longevity. All analyses were conducted using MATLAB®-based computer programs that were specifically developed during this study. A preliminary method to estimate pavement performance based on a single data point was developed. Finally, the LTPP measured pavement deflection data were analyzed to determine whether the data could be used as pavement distress indicators. During the analyses, existing temperature-adjustment procedures were evaluated, and a global algorithm was developed that was applied to all deflection sensors in all climatic regions. |
||||
17. Key Words
Pavement performance, Performance measures, Pavement rating, Treatment benefits, Pavement deflection |
18. Distribution Statement
No restrictions. This document is available through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. |
|||
19. Security Classification Unclassified |
20. Security Classification Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages 328 |
22. Price N/A |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (872) | Reproduction of completed page authorized |