U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
TECHNICAL REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-17-036    Date:  March 2018
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-17-036
Date: March 2018

 

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology Evaluation Final Report: Eco-Logical

References

  1. welcomia. “Stock Photo – Mountain Landscape. Colorado Wilderness Back Road” (digital image). Available online: https://www.123rf.com/photo_31326651_.html Last Accessed: January 30th, 2018. Licensed under agreement between 123RF and performing organization. Full license available at: https://www.123rf.com/license.php?type=standard.

  2. FHWA Research and Technology Agenda. (No Date). “Meeting the Challenge: Planning, Environment, and Realty,” (website) Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://highways.dot.gov/rt-agenda/meeting-challenges/meeting-challenge-planning-environment-and-realty, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  3. Brown, J. (2006). Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  4. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date). “2007 Grant Program for 15 Eco-Logical Projects,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/Grant_Program_Projects.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  5. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date). “2013 Implementation Award Program Recipients: Lead Adopter and User Incentives,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/IAP_Recipients_2013.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  6. Federal Register. (2002). Executive Order 13274: Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews, Homeland Security Digital Library, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=462816, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  7. Federal Highway Administration. (2005). SAFETEA-LU Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/legis.htm, last accessed June 12, 2017.

  8. Second Strategic Highway Research Program. (No Date). “Better Environmental and Highway Outcomes through Integrated Planning: Implementing Eco-Logical (C06),” (website) Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/goshrp2/Solutions/all/C06/Implementing_citeEcoLogicalcite/, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (No Date). “Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Compensatory Mitigation,” (website) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/compensatory-mitigation, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  10. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2009). GIS Applications in Eco-Logical Grant Projects: Peer Exchange Summary Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  11. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date). “Webinar Series,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/Webinar_Series.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  12. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Evaluating Montana’s ITEEM: Successes and Lessons for Eco-Logical, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  13. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Eco-Logical Grant Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  14. Federal Highway Administration. (2014). “2013/2014 Eco-Logical Program Annual Report (Detailed Image Description of Figure 2),” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/AnnualReports/annualreport_2013-14_fig2desc.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  15. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2012). Eco-Logical Grant Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  16. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Eco-Logical Successes, First Edition, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  17. Government Printing Office. (2012). Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, Public Law 112-141, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ141/pdf/PLAW-112publ141.pdf, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  18. SHRP2 Solutions. (2013). Implementation Plan: Implementing Eco-Logical, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  19. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2013). Eco-Logical Grant Program Annual Report, U.S Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  20. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Eco-Logical Successes, Second Edition, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  21. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Eco-Logical Successes, Third Edition, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  22. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Eco-Logical Grant Recipient Peer Exchange Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  23. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2013). An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, SHRP 2 Report, 2, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  24. The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2013). Expedited Planning and Environmental Review of Highway Projects, SHRP2 Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  25. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2014). Eco-Logical Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  26. Federal Highway Administration. (2013). Eco-Logical Successes, Fourth Edition, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  27. Crist, P., Gaines, L., Howie, S., and Kagan, J. (2014). Integrated Ecological Framework Outreach Project, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  28. Kagan, J. and Gaines, L. (2013). Methods to Develop a Crediting Strategy for Transportation and Metropolitan Planning Agencies, Institute for Natural Resources Publications, Portland, OR.

  29. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date). “Implementing the Eco-Logical Approach,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  30. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2013). An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, SHRP2 Report, 1, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  31. Marie Venner Consulting, URS Corporation, NatureServe, Oregon State University, and Parmetrix. (2014). A Practitioner’s Guide to the Integrated Ecological Framework, SHRP2 Report S2-C06-RW-3, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  32. Crist, P., Venner, M., Kagan, J., Howie, S., and Gaines, L. (2013). A Manager’s Guide to the Integrated Ecological Framework, SHRP2 Report, 4, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  33. Federal Highway Administration (2015). Implementing Eco-Logical Use of Performance Measures Shows Tangible Benefits and Progress of Eco-Logical in State DOTs and MPOs, Presented at the Transportation Research Board 2015 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  34. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2015). Eco-Logical Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  35. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date. “Technical Assistance Activities,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/technical_assistance_activities.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  36. Federal Highway Administration. (2013). Eco-Logical Grant Recipient Peer Exchange Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/researchprods/grant_recip_peer_ex.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  37. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Eco-Logical Technical Assistance Workshop: MaineDOT | April 1–2, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/workshop_MaineDOT_April2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  38. Federal Highway Administration (No Date) “Eco-Logical Peer Exchange: Mitigation Approaches for State DOTs March 11–12, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/peer_exchange/mitigation_peer_exchange_March2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  39. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Eco-Logical Peer Exchange: Mitigation Approaches for MPOs June 2–3, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/peer_exchange/mitigation_peer_exchange_June2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  40. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Eco-Logical Peer Exchange: Establishing a Regional Ecosystem Framework (REF) July 6, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/peer_exchange/mitigation_peer_exchange_July2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  41. Federal Highway Administration (No Date) “Eco-Logical at TRB—San Diego | September 22, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/workshop_TRB_SanDiego_Sept2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  42. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Implementing Eco-Logical Implementation Assistance Program (IAP) Peer Exchange | October 14–15, 2015,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/peer_exchange/IAP_peer_exchange_Oct2015.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  43. Multimodal Systems Research and Analysis, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, and Research and Innovative Technology Administration. (2009). GIS Applications in Eco-Logical Grant Projects: Peer Exchange summary Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.gis.fhwa.dot.gov/documents/PeerEx_report_72209.asp, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  44. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (2010). Code of Federal Regulations (Annual Edition), U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC.

  45. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2010). Eco-Logical Grant Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  46. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Library,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/library.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  47. Singer, D. and Williams, D. (2015). FHWA Eco-Logical Case Studies Series: Example of Implementing Eco-Logical Steps 7–9, Report No. FHWA-HEP-15-050, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  48. Baumgartner, T. and Williams, D. (2016). FHWA Eco-Logical Case Studies Series: Example of Implementing Eco-Logical Steps 5–6, Report No. FHWA-HEP-17-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  49. Hudson, W. and Williams, D. (2015). FHWA Eco-Logical Case Studies Series: Example of Implementing Eco-Logical Steps 1–4, Report No. FHWA-HEP-16-005, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  50. Federal Highway Administration. (2015). Implementing Eco-Logical 2014/2015 Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/annualreports/AnnualReport_2014-15.aspx, last accessed June 6, 2017.

  51. National Association of Regional Councils. (No Date) “National Association of Regional Councils Homepage,” (website) National Association of Regional Councils, Washington, DC. Available online: http://narc.org/, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  52. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (No Date) “Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grants,” (website) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/economic_development/sustainable_communities_regional_planning_grants, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  53. Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation. (No Date) “Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation Homepage,” (website) Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, Winston-Salem, NC. Available online: https://www.zsr.org/, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  54. U.S. Forest Service. (No Date) “U.S. Forest Service Homepage,” (website) U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fs.fed.us/, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  55. Houston-Galveston Area Council. (No Date) “Eco-Logical,” (website) Houston-Galveston Area Council, Houston, TX. Available online: http://www.h-gac.com/community/eco-logical/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  56. GroWNC. (No Date) “Maps,” (website) GroWNC, Asheville, NC. Available online: http://www.gro-wnc.org/maps.html, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  57. Esri®. (2016). “Protected Open Space Areas—SCAG Region,” (website) Esri®, Redlands, CA. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8e65cdb093504f3a827badab2325b1b6, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  58. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Using the Eco-Logical Approach to Develop and Implement Conservation and Mitigation Priorities for Oregon, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/osu_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  59. The Intertwine. (No Date) “The Intertwine Homepage,” (website) The Intertwine, Portland, OR. Available online: http://www.theintertwine.org/, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (No Date) “National Environmental Policy Act,” (website) U.S. Environmental Agency, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/nepa, last accessed December 19, 2017.

  61. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “FHWA Resource Center: Newsletters and Publications,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/teams/environment/publications.cfm, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  62. Hart, K., et al. (2009). The Central Texas Greenprint for Growth: A Regional Action Plan for Conservation and Economic Opportunity, The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA.

  63. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Central Texas Greenprint for Growth: A Tool for Balancing Sustainable Conservation Goals with the Infrastructure Needs of Our Rapidly Urbanizing Region, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/capcog_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  64. Houston-Galveston Area Council. (2010). Eco-Logical: Interactive Decision-Making Tool for Long-Range Transportation Planning, Houston-Galveston Area Council, Houston, TX. Available online: http://www.h-gac.com/community/eco-logical/documents/eco-logical-brochure.pdf, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  65. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Developing a Regional Decision-Support System for the Houston-Galveston Region, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/hgac_2011.aspx, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  66. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Linking Lands and Communities in the Land-of-Sky Region, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/losrc_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  67. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). An Eco-Logical Approach to Transportation Planning in the Kansas City Region, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/marc_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  68. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (No Date) “Ecoregion Download Files by State—Region 6,” (website) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregion-download-files-state-region-6, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  69. Regional Transportation Council. (2011). Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington, TX.

  70. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). North Central Texas Regional Ecosystem Framework, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/nctcog_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  71. Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. (2009). Green Infrastructure Study, Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, Charlottesville, VA.

  72. Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. What is Eco-Logical?, Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, Charlottesville, VA. Available online: http://campo.tjpdc.org/eco-logical/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  73. Rivanna River Basin Commission. (2012). 2012 Rivanna Snapshot, Rivanna River Basin Commission, Charlottesville, VA. Available online: http://www.rivannariverbasin.org/Rivanna-snapshot.php, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  74. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Integrating Green Infrastructure and Transportation Planning, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/tjpdc_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  75. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Regional Transportation, Ecosystem, and Land-Use Integration Plan, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/tcrpc_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  76. Colorado Department of Transportation. (2011). I-70 Mountain Corridor Record of Decision and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO. Available online: https://www.codot.gov/projects/i-70mountaincorridor/final-peis, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  77. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Developing a Regional Ecosystem Framework for Terrestrial and Aquatic Resources along the I-70 Corridor: An Eco-Logical Field Test, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/col_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  78. Chicago Department of Transportation. (No Date) “Chicago Complete Streets: Pilsen Sustainable Streetscape (Cermak/Blue Island),” (website) Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago, IL. Available online: http://chicagocompletestreets.org/portfolio/pilsen-sustainable-streetscape-cermakblue-island/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  79. Chicago Department of Transportation. (2013). Sustainable Urban Infrastructure, Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago, IL.

  80. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Sustainable Infrastructure Standards for Urban Ecology, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/chi_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  81. Blueprint Jordan River Steering Committee. (2008). Blueprint Jordan River, Envision Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

  82. Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Blueprint Jordan River: A Lake-to-Lake Vision, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/bpjr_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  83. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Creating Tools to Support Integrated Transportation and Resource Planning in New Hampshire, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/nha_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  84. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. (2015). 2015 North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Raleigh, NC. Available online: http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Conserving/documents/2015WildlifeActionPlan/NC-WAP-2015-All-Documents.pdf, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  85. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. (2013) “North Carolina Conservation Planning Tool,” (website) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, NC. Available online: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cpt/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  86. Federal Highway Administration. (2010). Integration of North Carolina’s Conservation and Transportation Planning. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/ncdenr_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  87. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Opportunities for Highway Programs to Remediate Natural Resource Concerns in New York, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/tcswcd_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  88. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). A Regional Ecological Assessment Protocol for the South Central United States, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/grants/reap_2011.aspx, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  89. North Central Texas Council of Governments. (2011). Regional Outer Loop Corridor Feasibility Study, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington, TX.

  90. Idaho Transportation Department. (No Date) “IPLAN: A Collaborative Information Site Brought to You by ITD,” (website) Idaho Transportation Department, Boise, ID. Available online: http://iplan.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  91. Ruth, M., et al. (2014). Natural Heritage Data, Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments, Cincinnati, OH. Available online: http://www.oki.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/OKI-Natural-Heritage-Data_SHRP2-Report.pdf, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  92. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments. (No Date) “Environmental Resources Viewer,” (website) Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments, Cincinnati, OH. Available online: http://www.oki.org/portfolio-items/environmental-resources-viewer/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  93. Idaho Transportation Department and Idaho Department of Fish and Game. (2015). Memorandum of Understanding Between the Idaho Transportation Department and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Idaho Transportation Department and Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID. Available online: https://islandparkus20.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IDFG-ITD-MOU-7-15-15.pdf, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  94. Missouri Department of Conservation. (No Date) “Welcome to the Missouri Natural Heritage Review Website,” (website) Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO. Available online: https://naturalheritagereview.mdc.mo.gov/, last accessed June 1, 2017.

  95. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau. (2015). Ecological Integrity Assessment Method Applied to Wetland Systems in New Hampshire, New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, Concord, NH.

  96. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1993). The Highway Methodology Workbook, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Concord, MA.

  97. Thomas Jefferson Planning Commission. (No Date) “Eco-Logical Pilot Project: Free Bridge Congestion Relief,” (website) Thomas Jefferson Planning Commission, Charlottesville, VA. Available online: http://campo.tjpdc.org/eco-logical/eco-logical-pilot-project/, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  98. Colorado Department of Transportation. (No Date) “I-70 Mountain Corridor Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS),” (website) Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO. Available online: https://www.codot.gov/projects/contextsensitivesolutions, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  99. Federal Highway Administration. (No Date) “Pennsylvania Environmental Review Toolkit,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/eco-logical/AnnualReports/annualreport_2013-14.aspx#ppacg, last accessed June 14, 2017.

  100. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2013). Assessment of Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments Use of TCAPP in Developing a Long-Range Transportation Plan, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

  101. Bowen, E. (2013). Using SHRP2 Technologies to Achieve Success—Idaho’s Approach, Federal Highway Administration, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, and Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Available online: http://shrp2.transportation.org/Documents/Presentations/AASHTO-WASHTO_Bowen.pdf, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  102. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (No Date). “Summary of the Endangered Species Act: 16 U.S.C. §1531 et seq. (1973),” (website) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-endangered-species-act, last accessed June 2, 2017.

  103. Maine Department of Environmental Protection. (No Date) “GIS Maps and Other Data Files,” (website) Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Augusta, ME. Available online: https://www1.maine.gov/dep/gis/datamaps/, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  104. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. (No Date) “Environmental Topics in Transportation Planning,” (website) Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Detroit, MI. Available online: https://www.semcog.org/environmental, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  105. Federal Highway Administration. No Date “CHRP2 C19 Expediting Project Delivery,” (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/shrp2/caseStudies/AMBAG_12-2016.aspx, last accessed June 13, 2017.

  106. O’Neill, T. and Bohannon, J. (2015). Conservation Framework and Assessment, Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, CA.

  107. Federal Highway Administration. (2013). Memorandum of Understanding: New Hampshire Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration Post-Construction Funding of Environmental Commitments, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_initiatives/initiatives_home.aspx, last accessed June 13, 2017.

Return to top

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101