U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
REPORT |
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-13-098 Date: January 2014 |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-13-098 Date: January 2014 |
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
More than half of pedestrian fatalities occur at unmarked locations away from intersections. However, little research has been conducted to understand why pedestrians cross roadways at unmarked locations. As a result, this study sought to better understand the environmental influences on both where and when pedestrians elect to cross the road. This report examines more than 70,000 pedestrian crossings at 20 different locations. The circumstances of those crossings (pedestrians yielding to vehicles, vehicles yielding to pedestrians, and evasive actions) were documented and analyzed. A model using environmental factors as inputs is provided to predict where (marked crosswalk intersection or outside the marked crosswalk) pedestrians will cross the road.
This report may be of interest to roadway designers, traffic engineers, and researchers who are concerned with the safety of pedestrian crossings at unmarked locations.
Monique Evans
Director, Office of Safety
Research and Development
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-098 |
2. Government Accession No.
|
3. Recipient’s Catalog No.
|
||||
4. Title and Subtitle Human Factors Assessment of Pedestrian Roadway Crossing Behavior |
5. Report Date January 2014 |
|||||
6. Performing Organization Code:
|
||||||
7. Author(s) Stacy A. Balk, Mary Anne Bertola, Jim Shurbutt, and Ann Do |
8. Performing Organization Report No.
|
|||||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address SAIC |
10. Work Unit No. TRAIS |
|||||
11. Contract or Grant No.
|
||||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Federal Highway
Administration |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
|
|||||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
|
||||||
15. Supplementary Notes The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) was C.Y. David Yang. |
||||||
16. Abstract Pedestrian–vehicle crashes are both common and deadly. The majority of pedestrian fatalities occur outside marked intersection crosswalks. The influences of pedestrian and environmental factors on crossing location choice were examined. A literature review covering factors intrinsic to pedestrians is provided. In addition, pedestrian crossings at 20 different locations were recorded and analyzed. The vast majority of crossings (89 percent of the total observed) took place in the marked intersection crosswalks. Drivers are likely to yield to pedestrians. However, while drivers are more likely to yield to pedestrians in the marked crosswalk, pedestrians and vehicles are equally as likely to yield to one another outside the marked crosswalk. The data also suggest that measures that reduce the perceived affordances to cross the roadway (e.g., flowerbeds that separate the sidewalk from the roadway) also reduce the proportion of crossings outside the marked crosswalks. It also appears that pedestrians cross when perceived control of the crossing is greatest. Measures to increase perceived control have the potential to increase (e.g., visible countdown clocks) or decrease (e.g., large medians) crossings in the marked crosswalk. A model to predict pedestrian crossing location is provided. The model uses various environmental variables as predicting factors and was shown to successfully predict an average of 90 percent of the crossings. |
||||||
17. Key Words Pedestrian, crosswalk, midblock crossings, safety, human factors assessment |
18. Distribution Statement No
restrictions. This document is available to the public through NTIS: National
Technical Information Service |
|||||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages 218 |
22. Price
|
|||
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) | Reproduction of completed page authorized |
Figure 2. Photo. Aerial view of Location 1
Figure 3. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 1 camera
Figure 5. Photo. Aerial view of Location 2
Figure 6. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 2 camera
Figure 8. Photo. Aerial view of
Location 3. Northwest between 7th and 6th Streets
Northwest
Figure 9. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 3 camera
Figure 11. Photo. Aerial view of Location 4
Figure 12. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 4 camera
Figure 14. Photo. Aerial view of Location 5
Figure 15. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 5 camera
Figure 17. Photo. Aerial view of Location 6
Figure 18. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 6 camera
Figure 20. Photo. Aerial view of Location 7
Figure 21. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 7 camera
Figure 23. Photo. Aerial view of Location 8
Figure 24. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 8 camera
Figure 27. Photo. Aerial view of Location 9
Figure 28. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 9 camera
Figure 30. Photo. Aerial view of Location 10
Figure 31. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 10 camera
Figure 33. Photo. Aerial view of Location 11
Figure 34. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 11 camera
Figure 36. Photo. Aerial view of Location 12
Figure 37. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 12 camera
Figure 39. Photo. Aerial view of Location 13
Figure 40. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 13 camera
Figure 42. Photo. Aerial view of Location 14
Figure 43. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 14 camera
Figure 45. Photo. Aerial view of Location 15
Figure 46. Photo. Still image captured from the Location 15 camera
Figure 48. Photo. Aerial view of Location 16
Figure 51. Photo. Aerial view of Location 17
Figure 53. Photo. Aerial view of location 18
Figure 55. Photo. Aerial view of location 19
Figure 59. Photo. Aerial view of Location 20
Figure 68. Equation. The logit of crossing at the intersection
Figure 70. Equation. The logit of crossing at the intersection during the walk phase
Table 1. Relevant sunrise, sunset, and weather for each of the coded data collection days
Table 2. Summary of pedestrian
crossings combined across all eight data collection
locations
Table 3. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 1
Table 4. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 2
Table 5. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 3
Table 6. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 4
Table 7. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 5
Table 8. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 6
Table 9. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 7
Table 10. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 8
Table 11. Predictors and their respective descriptions used for the models
Table 12. Summary of each of the model-selected effects (predictors) and their parameter estimates
Table 13. Percentage of pedestrians at each crossing area in each data collection location
Table 18. Relevant sunrise, sunset, and weather for each of the coded data collection days
Table 19. Summary of pedestrian crossings—combined across all seven data collection locations
Table 20. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 9
Table 21. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 10
Table 22. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 11
Table 23. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 12
Table 24. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 13
Table 25. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 14
Table 26. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 15
Table 27. Percentage of pedestrians at each crossing area in each data collection location
Table 32. Relevant sunrise, sunset, and weather for each of the coded data collection days
Table 33. Summary of pedestrian
crossings—combined across data collection locations
16–20
Table 34. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 16
Table 35. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 17
Table 36. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 18
Table 37. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 19
Table 38. Summary of pedestrian crossings at Location 20
Table 39. Percentage of pedestrians at each crossing area in each data collection location
Table 47. Factor loadings for the 16 environmental variables
Table 48. Standardized scoring coefficients for the five rotated factors
Table 51. Percentage of pedestrians crossing at each area in each data collection location