U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Policy and Governmental Affairs

FHWA Home / Policy & Governmental Affairs / 2004 Conditions and Performance

Conditions and Performance

2004 Conditions and Performance Report: Executive Summary Chapter 3
Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit:
2004 Conditions and Performance

Chapter 3 Executive Summary

System Conditions: Transit

U.S. transit system conditions depend on the quantity, age, and physical condition of the assets that make up the Nation's transit infrastructure. This infrastructure includes vehicles in service, maintenance facilities, the equipment they contain, and other supporting infrastructure such as guideways, power systems, rail yards, stations, and structures (bridges and tunnels).

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has undertaken extensive engineering surveys and collected a considerable amount of data on the U.S. transit infrastructure to evaluate transit asset conditions. FTA uses a rating system of 1 "poor" to 5 "excellent" to describe asset conditions.

Definitions of Transit Asset Condition
Rating Condition Description
Excellent5No visible defects, near new condition.
Good4Some slightly defective or deteriorated components.
Fair3Moderately defective or deteriorated components
Marginal2Defective or deteriorated components in need of replacement.
Poor1Seriously damaged components in need of immediate repair.

The average condition of urban bus vehicles increased from 3.05 in 2000 to 3.19 in 2002. The average condition of bus maintenance facilities increased from 3.23 in 2000 to 3.34 in 2002. In 2002, 68 percent of bus maintenance facilities were in adequate or better condition.

Condition of bus maintenance facilities, 2002. Pie chart in five segments. A rating of poor accounts for 1 percent; substandard accounts for 32 percent; adequate accounts for 55 percent; good accounts for 6 percent; and excellent accounts for 7 percent.

The average condition of rail vehicles increased from 3.38 in 2000 to 3.47 in 2002. The average age of rail vehicles declined from 21.8 years in 2000 to 20.4 years in 2002. Commuter rail vehicle conditions have been revised using new deterioration schedules based on engineering surveys undertaken in 2002. As a result, the commuter rail conditions in this edition of the report are about 15 percent lower than those reported in earlier editions.

Additional data collected by FTA since the last edition of this report revealed that the percentage of rail maintenance facilities that are less than 10 years old is higher than previously estimated. This new information has led to an upward revision in the condition estimate of rail maintenance facilities from 3.18 in 2000 to 3.56 in 2002. In 2002, 80 percent of rail maintenance facilities were estimated to be in adequate or better condition.

Condition of rail maintenance facilities, 2002. A rating of poor accounts for 18 percent; substandard accounts for 12 percent; adequate accounts for 50 percent; good accounts for 18 percent; and excellent accounts for 2 percent.

From 2000 to 2002, the conditions of track, substations, structures and third rail improved. The conditions of rail yards, overhead wire and stations declined. Station conditions fell from 3.4 in 2000 to 3.0 in 2002. This decrease was largely the result of new information collected directly from transit agencies rather than an actual change. Rail station conditions are, on average, considerably lower than bus station conditions.

Page last modified on November 7, 2014.
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000