Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home   |   Pavements Home
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-12-035
Date: November 2012

 

Relating Ride Quality and Structural Adequacy for Pavement Rehabilitation/Design Decisions

REFERENCES

  1. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. (2011). How to Get LTPP Data, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ research/tfhrc/programs/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/getdata.cfm.

  2. Boussinesq, J. (1885). Application des Potentiels a l’etude de l’equilibre et du Mouvement des Solids Elastiques, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.

  3. Burmeister, D.M. (1943). “The Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Systems and Applications to the Design of Airport Runways,” Proceedings, Highway Research Board, 23, 126–144.

  4. Von Quintus, H. and Killingsworth, B. (1997). Analysis Relating to Pavement Material Characterizations and Their Effects on Pavement Performance, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-05, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  5. Zhang, Z., Manuel, L., Damnjanovic, I., and Li, Z. (2003). Development of a New Methodology for Characterizing Pavement Structural Condition for Network Level Applications, Report No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4322-1, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

  6. Smith, J.T. and Tighe, S.L. (2004). “Assessment of Overlay Roughness in Long-Term Pavement Performance Test Sites: Canadian Case Study,” Transportation Research Record 1869, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  7. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D. (1999). “International Roughness Index of Asphalt Concrete Overlays: Analysis of Data from Long-Term Pavement Performance Program SPS-5 Projects,” Transportation Research Record 1655, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  8. Buch, N., Chatti, K., Haider, S.W., Pulipaka, A.S., Lyles, R.W., and Gilliland, D. (2006). “Network-Level Evaluation of Specific Pavement Study-2 Experiment: Using a Long-Term Pavement Performance Database,” Transportation Research Record 1947, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  9. Chatti, K. (2006). Effect of Design and Site Factors on Long-Term Performance of Flexible Pavements in SPS-1 Experiment, Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  10. Rauhut, J.B, Eltahan, A., and Simpson, A.L. (1999). Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing AC Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-193, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  11. Federal Highway Administration. (2000). Performance Trends of Rehabilitated AC Pavements, TechBrief, Publication No. FHWA-RD-00-165, McLean, VA.

  12. Federal Highway Administration. (1998). What Makes Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavements Rough?, TechBrief, Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-148, McLean, VA.

  13. Vepa, T.S, George, K.P., and Shekharan, A.R. (1996). “Prediction of Pavement Remaining Life,” Transportation Research Record 1524, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  14. Aultman-Hall, L., Jackson, E., Dougan, C.E., and Choi, S.N. (2004). “Models Relating Pavement Quality Measures,” Transportation Research Record 1869, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  15. Dewan, S.A. and Smith, R.E. (2002). “Estimating International Roughness Index from Pavement Distress to Calculate Vehicle Operating Costs for the San Francisco Bay Area,” Transportation Research Record 1816, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  16. Mactutis, J.A., Alavi, S.H., and Ott, W.C. (2000). “Investigation of Relationship Between Roughness and Pavement Surface Distress Based on WesTrack Project,” Transportation Research Record 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  17. Lin, J.D., Yau, J.T., and Hsiao, L.H. (2003). Correlation Analysis Between International Roughness Index and Pavement Distress By Neural Network, Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  18. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2008). Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, A Manual of Practice, Interim Edition, Washington, DC.

  19. Odoki, J.B. and Kerali, H.G.R. (2000). HDM-4 Analytical Framework and Model Descriptions, Vol. 4, Highway Development and Management, HDM-4 Series of Publications, World Bank, Washington, DC, and PIARC, Paris, France.

  20. Sayers, M.W. and Karamihas, S.M. (1997). The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information About Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

  21. Sayers, M.W. (1999). “Profiles of Roughness,” Transportation Research Record 1260, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  22. Karamihas, S.M. and Senn, K. (2009). “Profile Analysis of Arizona Specific Pavement Studies 5 Project,” Transportation Research Record 2095, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  23. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1993). Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, Washington, DC.

  24. Rada, G.R., Prabhakar, V., and James, M. (2011). Deflection Analysis of SPS-1 Sites (2011), Draft FHWA Report, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  25. Karamihas, S.M. and Gillespie, T.D. (2002). Smoothness Criteria for WIM Scale Approaches, UMTRI Report 2002-37, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

  26. Karamihas, S.M., Gillespie, T.D., Perera, R.W., and Kohn, S.D. (1999). Guidelines for Longitudinal Pavement Profile Measurement, Report No. 434, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  27. Byrum, C.R. (2005). “The Effect of Slab Curvature on IRI Values for Jointed Concrete Pavements,” International Journal of Concrete Pavements, 1(1), 23–32, International Society for Concrete Pavements, Cleveland, OH.

  28. Karamihas, S.M., Gillespie, T.D., Perera, R.W., and Kohn, S.D. (2001). Diurnal Changes in Profile of Eleven Jointed PCC Pavements, Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, Orlando, FL.

  29. Karamihas, S.M. and Senn, K. (2011). Curl and Warp Analysis of the LTPP SPS-2 Site in Arizona, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI

 


The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Provide leadership and technology for the delivery of long life pavements that meet our customers needs and are safe, cost effective, and can be effectively maintained. Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) R&T Web site portal, which provides access to or information about the Agency’s R&T program, projects, partnerships, publications, and results.
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration