TMIP Peer Review Program Assessment and Evaluation Report

Appendix B Interview Questions

Appendix C contains the list of ten questions sent to recent TMIP peer review host agency participants to elicit feedback on the agency's peer review experience.

1. What were the key motivations that led you to request a peer review?
2. What were the major outcomes you were hoping for from the peer review?
3. How effective was the peer review in achieving those outcomes? (What worked well? What did not work well?)
4. Did you make any changes to your model or modeling process based on the recommendations of the peer review panel? If so, what were the changes? Are you satisfied with the results?
5. Are there recommendations that you did not implement? If so, why not?
6. How well suited were the panelists in addressing your needs? (What worked well? What did not work well?)
7. How effective was the meeting format in addressing your objectives? Would you recommend any changes to the format? (What worked well? What did not work well?)
8. What suggestions do you have for improving the effectiveness of the various components of the peer review program? (e.g., the application process, choice of panelists, peer review session, peer review report, etc.)
9. What advice do you have for other agencies interested in participating in the peer review process? What agencies would benefit most from participation? What can agencies do to ensure that they receive the most value from participation?
10. Do you have any thoughts/concerns related to the TMIP Peer Review Program more generally?

Publication No

FHWA-HEP-12-024