U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-11-021
Date: April 2011

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures: State of The Practice

REFERENCES

  1. Wright, Jr., F. (2001). FHWA Recycled Materials Policy, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/recmatpolicy.htm. Site last accessed December 14, 2009.
  2. Federal Highway Administration. (1993). A Study of the Use of Recycled Paving Materials: A Report to Congress, Report No. FHWA-RD-93-147, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  3. The Asphalt Institute. (2007). The Asphalt Handbook: MS-4, 7th Ed., The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY.
  4. Federal Highway Administration. (1978–1983). Demonstration Project 39—Asphalt Recycling, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/recycling/index.cfm. Site last accessed January 6, 2011.
  5. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (1978). NCHRP Program Synthesis of Highway Practice No. 54: Recycling Materials for Highways, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  6. Epps, J.A., Little, D.N., Holmgreen, R.J., and Terrel, R.L. (1980). Guidelines for Recycling Pavement Materials, NCHRP Report No. 224, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  7. Sullivan, J. (1996). Pavement Recycling Executive Summary and Report, Report No. FHWA-SA-95-060, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  8. Kandhal, P. and Mallick, R.B. (1997). Pavement Recycling Guidelines for State and Local Governments—Participant's Reference Book, Report No. FHWA-SA-98-042, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  9. McDaniel, R. (1997). Incorporation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave System, NCHRP Report No. 09-12, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=948. Site last accessed January 6, 2011.
  10. Soleymani, H., et al. (2001). "Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method: Guidelines," Research Results Digest No. 253, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_253.pdf. Site last accessed December 13, 2009.
  11. McDaniel, R. and Anderson, R.M. (2001). Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method: Technician's Manual, NCHRP Report No. 452, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  12. Hansen, K. and Newcomb, D. (2007). RAP Usage Survey, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD.
  13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO M 323: Standard Specification for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  14. Bonaquist, R. (2007). "Can I Run More RAP?," Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, 11–13, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Landham, MD.
  15. Copeland, A., et al. (2010). "Field Evaluation of a High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement/Warm Mix Asphalt Project in Florida: A Case Study," Transportation Research Record 2179, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  16. West, R. (2008). Summary of NCAT Survey on RAP Management Practices and RAP Variability, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.morerap.us/RAP%20Resources/reports.html. Site last accessed January 6, 2011.
  17. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 308: Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt by the Ignition Method," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  18. Prowell, B. and Hurley, B. (2007). Quality Improvement Series 125: Warm-Mix Asphalt: Best Practices, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD.
  19. National Asphalt Pavement Association. (2007–2011). Warm Mix Asphalt the Wave of the Future, NAPA, Landham, MD. Obtained from: http://www.warmmixasphalt.org. Site last accessed January 6, 2011.
  20. National Asphalt Pavement Association. (2007). Information Series 123: Recycling Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements, NAPA, Lanham, MD.
  21. National Asphalt Pavement Association. (2009). How to Increase RAP Usage and Ensure Pavement Performance, NAPA, Lanham, MD.
  22. Federal Highway Administration. (1999). LTPPBind: A New Tool for Selecting Cost-Effective Superpave Asphalt Binder Performance Grades, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-082, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  23. Bonaquist, R.F., Christensen, D.W., and Stump, W. (2003). Simple Performance Tester for Superpave Mix Design: First Article Development and Evaluation, NCHRP Report 513, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  24. Christensen, D., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R. (2003). "Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 97–121.
  25. Andrei, D., Witczak, M.W., and Mirza, M.W. (1999). Development of a Revised Predictive Model for the Dynamic (Complex) Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures, NCHRP 1-37A Interteam Report s.l., University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
  26. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 2: Sampling of Aggregates," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  27. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 27: Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  28. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 164: Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Hot Mix Asphalt," Standards Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  29. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 319: Quantitative Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  30. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 30: Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  31. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2006). "Standard D5821: Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate," ASTM International Book of Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  32. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 304: Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  33. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2011). "Standard D4791: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate," ASTM International Book of Standards, 04.03, ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA.
  34. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 176: Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  35. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 209: Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  36. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO R 35: Standard Practice for Superpave Volumetric Design for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  37. Newcomb, D., Brown, E.R., and Epps, J.A. (2007). Quality Improvement Series 124: Designing HMA Mixtures with High RAP Content: A Practical Guide, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD.
  38. Mohammad, L. (2006). Performance Tests for HMA Including Fundamental and Empirical Procedures, STP 1469, ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA.
  39. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2008). NCHRP 9-46: Improved Mix Design, Evaluation, and Materials Management Practices for HMA with High RAP Content, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=1624. Site last accessed January 4, 2011.
  40. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO TP 63: Determining Rutting Susceptibility of HMA Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA)," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  41. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 324: Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  42. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO TP 79: Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for HMA Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT)," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  43. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 283: Resistance of Compacted HMA to Moisture-Induced Damage," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  44. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). "AASHTO T 321: Determining the Fatigue Life of Compacted HMA Subjected to Repeated Flexural Bending," Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 30th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  45. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2011). NCHRP 9-29: Simple Performance Tester for Superpave Mix Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=963. Site last accessed January 4, 2011.
  46. Kandhal, et al. (1995). Performance of Recycled Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures in the State of Georgia, NCAT Report No. 95-01, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL.
  47. Al-Qadi, I., Elseifi, M., and Carpenter, S. (2007). Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement—A Literature Review, Report No. FHWA-ICT-07-001, Illinois Center for Transportation, Rantoul, IL.
  48. Paul, H.R. (1996). Evaluation of Recycled Projects for Performance, 65, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Lino Lakes, MN.
  49. National Center for Asphalt Technology. (2009). "LTPP Data Shows RAP Mixes Perform as Well as Virgin Mixes," Asphalt Technology News, 21, 2, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL.
  50. Ayers, M., et al. (2009). Impact of Design Features on Pavement Response and Performance in Rehabilitated Flexible and Rigid Pavements, Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-066, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  51. Hong, F., et al. (2010). "Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Results from Texas: Pavement Studies Category 5 Sections from the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program," Transportation Research Record 2180, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  52. Zaghloul, S. and Holland, T.J. (2008). "Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Field Performance of Recycled Asphalt in California Environmental Zones," Transportation Research Record 2084, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  53. Musselman, J. (2009). High RAP Performance in Florida, HMA Recycling Expert Task Group, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.morerap.us/12-09/Musselman.High_RAP_Performance_Florida.pdf. Site last accessed January 4, 2011.

 

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101