U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
|
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-06-073 Date: July 2006 |
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
Progress is being made in efforts to combat alkali-silica reaction in both new and existing portland cement concrete structures. Of the several viable methods that exist to prevent damage in concrete structures because of this significant durability problem, the use of lithium compounds has been recognized for more than 50 years. There has been renewed interest in recent years in using lithium compounds as either an admixture in new concrete or as a treatment of existing structures.
This report is intended to provide practitioners with the necessary information and guidance to test, specify, and use lithium compounds in new concrete construction, as well as in repair and service life extension applications. This report will be of interest to engineers, contractors, and others involved in the design and specification of new concrete, as well as those involved in mitigation of the damaging effects of alkali-silica reaction in existing concrete structures.
Gary Henderson
Director, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No. FHWA-HRT-06-073 | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
4. Title and Subtitle Interim Recommendations for the Use of Lithium to Mitigate or Prevent Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) | 5. Report Date July 2006 | ||
6. Performing Organization Code | |||
7. Author(s) Kevin J. Folliard, Michael D.A. Thomas, Benoit Fournier, Kimberly E. Kurtis, and Jason H. Ideker | 8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address The Transtec Group, Inc. 1012 East 38½ Street Austin, TX 78751 | 10. Work Unit No. | ||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-02-C-00097 | |||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Federal Highway Administration 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Interim Report April-November 2005 | ||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR): Fred Faridazar, HRDI-11 |
|||
16. Abstract Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) is a significant durability problem that has resulted in premature deterioration of various types of concrete structures in the United States and throughout the world. Although several viable methods exist to prevent ASR-induced damage in new concrete structures, very few methods mitigate further damage in structures already affected by ASR-induced expansion and cracking. Lithium compounds have been recognized for more than 50 years as effectively preventing expansion caused by ASR, and there has been renewed interest in recent years in using lithium compounds as either an admixture in new concrete or as a treatment of existing structures. This report is intended to provide practitioners with the necessary information and guidance to test, specify, and use lithium compounds in new concrete construction, as well as its use in repair and service life extension applications. This report replaces the previous report (Guidelines for the Use of Lithium to Mitigate or Prevent ASR, Folliard, et al., 2003) and includes significant changes, especially those related to recommendations for testing and specifying lithium compounds. This report provides a basic overview of ASR, including information on mechanisms, symptoms of ASR damage in field structures, mitigation approaches, test methods, and specifications. A comprehensive summary of lithium compounds is provided, including information on their production, availability, and use in laboratory concrete studies and field applications (including a range of case studies). Guidelines for using lithium compounds as an admixture in new concrete and for treating existing structures suffering from ASR-induced damage are presented, including information on how to assess the efficacy of lithium compounds in laboratory tests. Some basic information also is provided on the economics of using lithium both in new concrete and as a treatment for existing structures. A summary of conclusions is included and identifies several technical and practical issues that should be considered for future laboratory studies and field applications. |
|||
17. Key Words Alkali-silica reaction, lithium, concrete durability, mitigation, fresh concrete, hardened concrete, case studies, laboratory testing, field investigation, existing structures |
18. Distribution Statement No Restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service; Springfield, VA 22161. |
||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages 94 |
22. Price |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
1.2 Summary of revisions and modifications to guidelines
CHAPTER 2 ALKALI-SILICA REACTION
2.2.1 Essential Components of ASR
2.3 LABORATORY TEST METHODS FOR ASSESSING ASR
2.4.1 Minimizing or Preventing ASR in New Concrete
2.4.2 Mitigating ASR in Existing Concrete
CHAPTER 3 LITHIUM COMPOUNDS FOR CONTROLLING ASR
3.3 USING LITHIUM COMPOUNDS TO CONTROL ASR
3.3.2 Mechanisms of ASR Suppression by Lithium Compounds
3.3.3 Laboratory Studies Using Lithium to Control ASR: A Critical Review
3.3.4 Specifications for Using Lithium to Control ASR in Concrete
4.2 USING LITHIUM AS AN ADMIXTURE IN NEW CONCRETE
4.2.1 Lomas Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM (1992)
4.2.2 Lackawanna Valley Industrial Highway, PA (1997)
4.2.3 U.S. I-90, Oacoma, SD (1996)
4.2.4 Coyote Springs Bridge, NM (2000)
4.2.5 Bridge Deck Overlay, Wilmington, DE (1999)
4.2.6 Bridge Deck Overlay, Lyman County, SD (2000)
4.2.7 Utility Transmission Towers, Corpus Christi, TX (2000)
4.2.8 Repair of Platte Winner Bridge, SD (1998)
4.3 USING LITHIUM TO SUPPRESS EXPANSION IN ASR-AFFECTED CONCRETE
4.3.2 Electrochemical Migration
CHAPTER 5 APPROACH FOR USING LITHIUM IN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE STRUCTURES
5.2 USing LITHIUM COMPOUNDS IN NEW CONCRETE
5.2.1 Performance-Based Recommendations for Using Lithium in New Concrete
5.2.2 Prescriptive Guidelines for Lithium in New Concrete
5.3 USING LITHIUM IN EXISTING CONCRETE
5.3.2 Electrochemical Migration
CHAPTER 6 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS OF USING LITHIUM COMPOUNDS
6.2 ECONOMICS OF USING LITHIUM COMPOUNDS IN NEW CONCRETE
6.3 ECONOMICS OF TREATING EXISTING CONCRETE WITH LITHIUM
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
Figure 1. The Three Necessary Components for ASR-Induced Damage in Concrete
Figure 4. Effects of pH on Dissolution of Amorphous Silica (Tang and Su-Fen, 1980)
Figure 9. Extrusion of Joint-Sealing Material Triggered by Excessive Expansion Due to ASR
Figure 12. Relative Expansion of Concrete Prisms Containing Lithium Compounds
Figure 14. Elastic Modulus of Concrete Cores From Lomas Boulevard
Figure 15. General View of Lomas Boulevard Experimental Pavement
Figure 16. Control Section With Placitas-February 1999
Figure 17. Section With Class C Fly Ash and Placitas-February 1999
Figure 18. Section With Class F Fly Ash and Placitas-February 1999
Figure 19. Section With 1 Percent LiOH and Placitas-February 1999
Figure 20. Section With Class F Fly Ash and Placitas-May 2001
Figure 21. Lackawanna Valley Industrial Highway Experimental Section
Figure 23. Impact Echo Testing-Lackawanna Valley Industrial Highway Experimental Pavement
Figure 24. Experimental Pavement on I-90 Near Oacoma, SD
Figure 25. Coyote Springs Bridge, NM
Figure 26. Cracking on Deck Surface of Coyote Springs Bridge, NM
Figure 27. Bridge Deck Overlay, Wilmington, DE
Figure 29. Bridge Deck Overlay, Lyman County, SD
Figure 30. Utility Transmission Tower Footing in Corpus Christi, TX
Figure 31. Repair of Pile Caps on Platte Winner Bridge, SD
Figure 32. Topical Application of Pavement Near Wolsey, SD
Figure 33. Bridge Carrying Westbound Lanes of I-68 Near LaVale, MD
Figure 34. Cracking in 12-Year-Old Bridge Deck
Figure 35. Cracking of 11-Year-Old Untreated Section of Rt. 1 in Delaware
Figure 36. Sections of Rt. 1 Near Bear, DE
Figure 37. Making Length-Change Measurements on a Treated Pavement in Mountain Home, ID
Figure 38. Bridge Over Montreal River Near Latchford, ON
Figure 40. Optimal Time for Lithium Treatment Applied Topically (Johnston, et al., 2000)
Table 1. Rock Types and Reactive Minerals Susceptible to ASR (After CSA, 2000b)
Table 2. Available Standard Tests for Assessing Alkali-Silica Reactivity
Table 3. CSA Guidelines for Controlling ASR in New Concrete (CSA, 2000a)
Table 4. Principal Lithium Minerals and Their Sources (After Lumley, 1997)
Table 5. Effects of Lithium Compounds on Mortar Bar Expansion (From McCoy and Caldwell, 1951)
Table 7. Effects of Lithium Compounds on Mortar Bar Expansion (After Stark, 1992)
Table 8. Summary of Selected Research Findings Related to Lithium Dosages
Table 10. BRE (2002) Guidelines for Using Lithium in New Concrete
Table 11. Summary of Mixtures Used in Lomas Boulevard Experimental Pavement
Table 12. Results From the ASTM C 1260 Tests (Stark, et al., 1993)
Table 13. Observations From Petrographic Examination of Cores
Table 14. Criteria for Assessing ASR Damage Based on Staining Techniques and Petrographic Analysis
Table 16. Summary of Mixtures Used in I-90 Oacoma Experimental Pavement
Table 17. Summary of Structures Treated With Lithium.
Terms
AAR Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACR Alkali-Carbonate Reaction
AMBT Accelerated Mortar Bar Test
ASR Alkali-Silica Reaction
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BRE Building Research Establishment
CPT Concrete Prism Test
CSA Canadian Standards Association
DOT Department of Transportation
ECE Electrochemical Chloride Extraction
EDL Electrical Double Layer
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory
NMSHTD New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department
SCM Supplementary Cementitious Material
SHRP Strategic Highway Research Program
SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
UK United Kingdom
Chemical Notations
C-S-H Calcium silicate hydrate
CaOH Calcium hydroxide
K2O Potassium oxide
KCl Potassium chloride
[Li]/[Na+K] Molar ratio of lithium ions to the sum of sodium and potassium ions
LiCl Lithium chloride
LiF Lithium flouride
LiNO3 Lithium nitrate
LiOH Lithium hydroxide
LiOH·H2O Lithium hydroxide monohydrate
Li2CO3 Lithium carbonate
Li2SiO3 Lithium silicate
Li2SO4 Lithium sulfate
M molar
N normal
Na2O Sodium oxide
Na2Oe Total sodium oxide equivalent
NaCl Sodium chloride
OH- Hydroxyl ion
Measurements
cm centimeter
g gram
GPa gigapascal
kg kilogram
kgf kilogram force
L liter
m meter
mL milliliter
MPa megapascal
ppm parts per million
w/cm water-cementitious materials ratio