U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
TECHNICAL REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-17-036    Date:  March 2018
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-17-036
Date: March 2018

 

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology Evaluation Final Report: Eco-Logical

Appendix B. Data Sources by Recipient

The following tables list the Eco-Logical grant recipients, the type of agency, and if they responded to the survey listed.

Table 12. 2007 Eco-Logical Program recipient data collected by the Eco-Logical Program staff and evaluation team.
Type of Agency Agency 2008 Interview 2009 Interview 2010 Interview 2011 Interview 2012 Interview 2014 Interview 2014 Questionnaire 2015 Interview 2015 Peer Exchange 2016 Evaluation Interview
MPO CAPCOG X X X — X — — — — —
MPO H-GAC X X X — X — X — — X
MPO LOSRC X X X — X — X — — X
MPO MARC X X X — X — X — — X
MPO NCTCOG X X X X X — — — — X
MPO TJPDC X X X X X — — — — —
MPO TCRPC X X X — X — X — — X
State transportation department CDOT X X X X X — — — — X
Other Chicago Department of Transportation X X X X X — X — — X
Other Envision Utah X X X — X — — — — —
Other NHA X X X — X — X — — —
Other NCDENR X X X X X — — — — —
Other OSU X X X X X — X — — X
Other TCSWCD X X X X X — X — — X
Other USEPA Region 6 X X X X X — X — — X

—No data were collected.

X = data were collected.

Table 13. 2013 SHRP2 IAP recipient data collected by the Eco-Logical Program staff and evaluation team.
Type of Agency Agency 2008 Interview 2009 Interview 2010 Interview 2011 Interview 2012 Interview 2014 Interview 2014
Questionnaire		 2015 Interview 2015 Peer
Exchange		 2016 Evaluation
Interview
Lead adopter—MPO ARC — — — — — X — X X X
Lead adopter—MPO CA-MPO — — — — — X — X X X
Lead adopter—MPO NCTCOG — — — — — X — X X X
Lead adopter—MPO PPACOG — — — — — X — X — X
Lead adopter—State transportation department ITD — — — — — X — X — X
Lead adopter—State transportation department MaineDOT — — — — — X — X X X
Lead adopter—State transportation department MDOT — — — — — X — X X X
User incentive—MPO AMBAG — — — — — X — X — X
User incentive—MPO OKICOG — — — — — X — X X X
User incentive—MPO SCAG — — — — — X — X — —
User incentive—State transportation department Caltrans — — — — — X — X — X
User incentive—State transportation department ITD — — — — — X — X — X
User incentive—State transportation department MoDOT — — — — — X — X — X
User incentive—State transportation department NHDOT — — — — — X — X — —

—No data were collected.

X = data were collected.

Return to top

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101