U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-17-048    Date:  May 2018
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-17-048
Date: May 2018

 

Enhancing Safety and Operations at Complex Interchanges With Improved Signing, Markings, and Integrated Geometry

References

  1. Fitzpatrick, K., Chrysler, S.T., Brewer, M.A., Nelson, A., and Iragavarapu, V. (2013). Simulator Study of Signs for a Complex Interchange and Complex Interchange Spreadsheet Tool, Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-047, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  2. Richard, C.M., and Lichty, M.G. (2013). Driver Expectations When Navigating Complex Interchanges, Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-048, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  3. Lichty, M., Bacon, P., and Richard, C. (2014). Collecting and Analyzing Stakeholder Feedback for Signing at Complex Interchanges, Report No. FHWA-HRT-14-069, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  4. Russell, E.R. (1998). “Using Concepts of Driver Expectancy, Positive Guidance, and Consistency for Improved Operation and Safety,” Transportation Conference Proceedings, pp. 155–158. Available online: http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/pubs/crossroads/155using.pdf, last accessed 3 March 2018.

  5. Upchurch, J., Fisher, D.L., and Waraich, B. (2005). “Guide Signing for Two-Lane Exits with an Option Lane: Evaluation of Human Factors,” Transportation Research Record, 1918, pp. 35–45, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  6. Roberts, K.M., and Klipple, A.G. (1976). “Driver Expectations at Freeway Lane Drops,” Public Roads, 40(1), pp. 32–35, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  7. Fitzpatrick, K., Lance, M., and Lienau, T. (1995). “Effects of Pavement Markings on Driver Behavior at Freeway Lane Drop Exits,” Transportation Research Record, 1495, pp. 17–27, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  8. Borowsky, A., Shinar, D., and Parmet, Y. (2008). “Relation Between Driving Experience and Recognition of Road Signs Relative to their Locations,” Human Factors, 50(2), pp. 173–182, SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  9. Katz, B.J., Golembiewski, G.A., Dagnall, E.E., O’Donnell, C.C., and Shurbutt, J. (2014). “Evaluation of Combined Lane Use and Destination Sign Alternatives for Overhead-Mounted Guide Signs on Multilane Conventional Road Intersection Approaches,” Transportation Research Record, 2463, pp. 55-62, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  10. Gordon, D.A. (1972). “Evaluation of Diagrammatic Guide Signs,” Highway Research Record, 414, pp. 30–41, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC.

  11. Brackett, Q., Huchingson, R.D., Trout, N.D., and Womack, K. (1992). “Study of Urban Guide Sign Deficiencies,” Transportation Research Record, 1368, pp. 1–9, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  12. Katz, B.J., Dagnall, E.E., Bertola, M.A., O’Donnell, C.C., and Shurbutt, J. (2014). “Evaluation of Truncated Arrow Per Lane Guide Signs,” Transportation Research Record, 2434, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  13. Chrysler, S.T., Holick, A.J., Williams, A.A., and Funkhouser, D.S. (2007). Driver Comprehension of Diagrammatic Advanced Guide Signs and their Alternatives, Report No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5147-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.

  14. Doctor, M., Merritt, G., and Moler, S. (2009). “Designing Complex Interchanges.” (website). Available online: https://fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/09novdec/01.cfm, last accessed 22 February 2017.

  15. Ray, B.L., Schoen, J., Jenior, P., and Knudsen, J. (2011). Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing. NCHRP Report No. 687, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  16. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2011). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Washington, DC.

  17. Bared, J. (2007). Safety Assessment of Interchange Spacing on Urban Freeways, TechBrief No. FHWA-HRT-07-031, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  18. Ismail, A., Aram, A., Aminzadeh, R., and Rahmat, R.A. (2011). “Crashes and Effective Safety Factors Within Interchanges and Ramps on Urban Freeways and Highways,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(7), pp. 397–404, American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information, Amman, Jordan.

  19. Glad, R.W., Milton, J.C., and Olson, D.K. (2001). Weave Analysis and Performance: The Washington State Case Study, Report No. WA-RD 515.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA.

  20. Chen, H. (2008). Safety evaluation of freeway exit ramps, Master of Science Thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

  21. Highways England. (2016). Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Birmingham, England.

  22. Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  23. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2014). Highway Safety Manual, First Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  24. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2011). Roadside Design Guide, 4th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  25. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2009). Traffic Engineering Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.

  26. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2006). Freeway and Interchange Geometric Design Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.

  27. Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  28. Esri. (2017). Figure 2. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=17537878a4df4f1e8024063db471c679.

  29. Federal Highway Administration. (2001). Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-103, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  30. Kuznicki, S. and Katz, B. (2015). “Designing for Consistency: Matching Applications to Scenarios in the Use of Traffic Control Devices/Signing, Paper 163,” Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  31. Esri. (2017). Figure 6. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=8e7a53f221764ad6bbd6a437240b42ed.

  32. Esri. (2017). Figure 7. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=351f406a997d4c689294c5caa7393683.

  33. Esri. (2017). Figure 9. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=dc05cd2f713a495998e7c31c341557de.

  34. Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2015). Traffic Guide Sign Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.

  35. Federal Highway Administration. (2004). Standard Highway Signs, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  36. Esri. (2017). Figure 21. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=418490e4f83a4892a7b9425faba207f1.

  37. Esri. (2017). Figure 22. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=418490e4f83a4892a7b9425faba207f1.

  38. Washington State Department of Transportation. (2011). Longitudinal Marking Substitution w/Raised Pavement Markers Standard Plan M-20.50-02, Washington State Department of Transportation.

  39. Lew, R. (2013). undaqTools 0.2.3: Python Package Index. Available online: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/undaqTools, last accessed July 15, 2015.

  40. SAS Institute. “Binomial Proportions.” Base SAS(R) 9.2, Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, Third Edition. Available online: http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/procstat/63104/HTML/default/viewev.htm#procstat_freq_sect028.htm, last accessed 22 February 2017.

  41. SAS Institute. “Exact Statistics.” Base SAS(R) 9.2, Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, Third Edition.

  42. Deng, C. (2014). “Computing Confidence Interval for Poisson Mean.” (blog) On Biostatistics and Clinical Trials. Available online: http://onbiostatistics.blogspot.com/2014/03/computing-confidence-interval-for.html, last accessed 7 March 2018.

  43. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, J., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I. (2009). The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update, SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1).

  44. Esri. (2017). Figure 45. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=c0ab969b9f124b2aa6299c70f72f04a7.

  45. Esri. (2017). Figure 53. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=720f2c85d2d547ffab96c8358abdb2c2.

  46. Esri. (2017). Figure 60. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=4c628e22011148119b9a33bdaceef608.

  47. Esri. (2017). Figure 61. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=44ee987a5e484576bce08a1fab2383ad.

  48. Esri. (2017). Figure 63. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=28f60c3f5e344b7f894e38ef0e8af195.

  49. Esri. (2017). Figure 65. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=c94e6151129b49d1a12fe6bffc4df7b0.

  50. Esri. (2017). Figure 67. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=80a077f20ebc46fabc9daaae4fbb18f0.

  51. Washington State Department of Transportation. (2015). Traffic Manual (M 51-02.08), Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA.

  52. Campbell, J., et al. (2012). Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems, NCHRP Report 600 17-47, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  53. Esri. (2017). Figure 85. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=ca93e4d8d517411294955206ffd59f1c.

  54. Esri. (2017). Figure 86. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=ebe63a3589fd4a08b3e3be8925bc545b.

  55. Esri. (2017). Figure 87. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=5a2980c70df24dbb954e768db4ecb6b2.

  56. Esri. (2017). Figure 88. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=b4526ade863e4e08b48c652341391fbc.

  57. Esri. (2017). Figure 89. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=a4468835bced4eac920381e35b5ea50c.

  58. Esri. (2017). Figure 90. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=ab6ce209c5e044f1bc4519c216a5374b.

  59. Esri. (2017). Figure 91. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=a5e34bc464b0427cb83013d3eeeb2b85.

  60. Esri. (2017). Figure 92. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=95d544bd8c5c4f08a477cf927dcde5a5.

  61. Esri. (2017). Figure 93. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=a45dd07114034f568d88f0c6b606e2c4.

  62. Esri. (2017). Figure 94. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=759b3de5980e494ea6c85a259c671087.

  63. Esri. (2017). Figure 95. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=27b77983372b4371ac8ce594bd0c075b.

  64. Esri. (2017). Figure 96. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=d2a0d54776a34b85b8d798aabf2ddd07.

  65. Esri. (2017). Figure 97. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from ArcGIS. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=0632841d6bbc42cb9c37ff014b4853bd.

Return to top

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101