Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
|
Δ Speed | + 4 mph | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 40.076 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | NA |
|
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 40.076 kg/day (0.0442 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $660,000 | $0 | $660,000 |
Materials provided by the local sponsor indicate no local match for this project. The cost effectiveness analysis provided by the project sponsor assumes the service life of the project and amortization period are 15 years. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $660,000 | $0 | $660,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $110,256 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $660,000 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $660,000 |
NOTE: Emissions reductions reported by the project sponsor do not match the emissions reductions in the CMAQ database (-57 kg/day VOC).
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
Travel analysis performed by VISSIM Microscopic Simulation model used recent traffic counts and traffic signal information to give an average delay in seconds per vehicle at the intersection. (Total Delay = Peak Hour volume * Average Delay in sec/veh/3600). Hourly reduction in delay is calculated separately for the AM and PM peak periods and summed. The analysis showed that the proposed improvements would enhance traffic flow during peak hours increasing from 5,800 to 6,500 VPH in the AM peak, and from 6,200 to 6,700 VPH in the PM peak. Average delay would drop from 92.6 to 36.0 sec/veh in the AM peak, and 178.3 to 34.4 sec/veh in the PM peak. Net reduction in delay is 84.2 veh-hr/hr in the AM peak and 304.5 veh-hr/hr in the PM peak. Intersection analysis also shows change in LOS for each intersection segment. |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | - 388 vehicle-hours/hour | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 20.12 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 5.18 kg/day |
Emissions reduction = Delay in vehicle-hours/hour * Emissions Factor * 2.5 (conversion of gm/mi to gm/hr) * 2 hours per day (calculated for 2-hour Am peak and 2-hour Pm peak separately, and summed) |
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 25.30 kg/day (0.028 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $4,400,000 | $1,100,000 | $5,500,000 |
Assumes that project has benefits 260 days per year. To calculate overall cost-effectiveness, need to develop assumptions regarding useful life of project (could be 20 years for an infrastructure project of this nature, although it's not clear that delay reductions will remain constant over this long of a period). |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $4,400,000 | $1,100,000 | $5,500,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $904,773 | ||||
Annual revenues | NONE | ||||
Net public cost | $5.5 M | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $5.5 M |
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
Delay = 4 minutes per vehicle, based on a report on the Integrated Traffic SigNAl System from 2001, which determined the reduction in delay and corresponding emissions savings by using an average reduction for 18 intersections and projecting it throughout the total system. Vehicle counts provided by Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Division of Planning |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | - 4 min/vehicle | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 35.5 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 9.1 kg/day |
Emissions factors are based on EPA calculations for general vehicle fleet mix. The percentage of vehicle types or classifications was used to determine the grams of pollutant reduced per minute by the reduction in delay, using Our Nation's Highways, from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (average of vehicle counts per arterial) x (minute of delay reduced by fiber optic) x (g/min per VOC, NOx, CO) = total grams VOC, NOx, CO per day |
Δ CO | - 378.0 kg/day | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 44.6 kg/day (0.05 tpd) |
Project life: NA | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $320,000 | $80,000 | $400,000 |
Cost-effectiveness was not provided by the project sponsor. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $320,000 | $80,000 | $400,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | NA | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $400,000 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $400,000 |
NOTE: Emissions reductions reported in CMAQ database differ from estimates provided or calculated from sponsor-provided documentation. Reductions reported in the CMAQ database were reported in the template. The project calculation showed much higher values (-200.94 kg/day VOC, -54.89 kg/day NOx, -2,272 kg/day CO); however, a more recent, similar project reported figures closer to the values reported in the CMAQ database. The project specifics seem to indicate that the delay reduction (4 min/vehicle) is an extrapolation of the effects of the project across the entire system, not just for the 18 intersections.
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
Modeling done using Syncro Version 5 for the PM period. There is minor congestion during the entire business day, so the AM and PM Peak Periods are similar. The change in delay was calculated for four (4) intersections using the following formula: (Approach Volume * Stop Control Delay) (Approach Volume * Signalized Delay) = Total Delay Reduction
|
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | - 702 hours/day | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 5.115 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 3.909 kg/day |
Emissions reductions calculated using Mobile6. Idle emissions calculated using exhaust emissions for a 2.5 mile/hour average speed. The Mobile Factors used Main Street as a Minor Arterial Urban Class 16 and all intersecting streets as Local Urban Class 19 to determine emissions. |
Δ CO | - 90.710 kg/day | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | -9.02 kg/day (0.0099 tpd) |
Project life: 5-10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||||||||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $355,302 | $284,241 | $639,543 |
Documentation provided by the State indicates the project was funded in FY 2005 and 2006 and some portion of funds de-obligated in FY 2007. Cost-effectiveness was not provided by sponsor.
Project sponsor assumes service life is 5 years. The cost-effectiveness analysis in this study used 10 years for consistency with other signalization projects. |
|||||||||
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||
Total | $355,302 | $284,241 | $639,543 | ||||||||||
Total annualized public cost | $98,414 | ||||||||||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||||||||||
Net public cost | $639,543 | ||||||||||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||||||||||
Total net cost | $639,543 |
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
|
Δ Speed | + 4 mph | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 14.969 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | + 2.206 kg/day |
Emissions factors for before project implementation and after project implementation based on MOBILE6 and average speeds of 34 mph and 38 mph, respectively. Emissions reduction = VMT x (Emissions Factor before project Emissions Factor after project)
|
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 12.763 kg/day (0.014 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $33,000 | $0 | $33,000 |
Cost-effectiveness was not provided by the project sponsor. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $33,000 | $0 | $33,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $5,078 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $33,000 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $33,000 |
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
Reduction in delay determined by the Synchro model output, based on a one-hour simulation. These one hour peak delay reductions, per day, were used to determine an average delay for two hours of peak travel reductions. |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | - 63 vehicle-hours | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 2.889 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 1.089 kg/day |
The delay reductions were used to calculate the emissions savings using emissions factors provided by US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Reduction in delay * average of vehicle mix for kg/min per CO, NOx, VOC * 255 days per year. |
Δ CO | - 44.95 kg/day | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 4 kg/day (0.0044tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $400,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 |
Assumes benefits 255 days/year. Cost-effectiveness was not provided by project sponsor. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $400,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $74,536 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $500,000 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $500,000 |
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
48,670 average traffic volumes for Year 2009 were calculated using the CDTC STEP Model. The CDTC STEP Model forecast was validated using a 1999 intersection count and used to calculate seconds of delay for approach vehicles with the existing signalized intersection. The RODEL Roundabout Capacity Model was used to conduct an analysis of the Washington Avenue/Fuller Road intersection and was used to calculate seconds of delay for approach vehicles under the new, roundabout build scenario. (11.5 sec avg "No Build" delay 5 sec avg "New Roundabout" delay = 6.5 sec avg change in delay.
VMT was estimated using a quarter mile approach for each leg of the intersection. Speeds were calculated over that same distance as 15 mph under existing conditions and 29 mph with the roundabout. The STEP model was also used to calculate seconds of delay for vehicles with the existing signalized intersection for the no-build scenario. The NYSDOT Roundabout Design Unit conducted an analysis of the proposed improvement using the RODEL Roundabout Capacity model to calculate seconds of delay for approach vehicles under the build scenario. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ Speed | + 14 mph | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ Delay | - 6.5 sec/veh. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ SOV | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ CP/VP | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ Transit | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ Walk | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 24.17 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 1.94 kg/day |
The NYSDOT software package CMAQtraq was used to estimate emissions, using the "Traffic Flow Improvements" module. Effects were calculated for 250 days/year with the following emissions factors (g/mile):
|
Δ CO | - 24.17 kg/day | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 26.11 kg/day (0.029 tpd) |
Project life: NA | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $2.0 M | $2.87 M | $4.87 M |
Funding will include planning, design, and construction of the intersection improvement. A cost effectiveness calculation was not provided by the project sponsor. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $2.0 M | $2.87 M | $4.87 M | ||
Total annualized public cost | $467,981 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $4.87 M | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $4.87 M |
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
The overall level of VMT and vehicle trips is not assumed to be affected. Emissions reductions will occur through a reduction in nonrecurring congestion. |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 189.601 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 488.972 kg/day |
Emissions factors for baton rouge based on MOBILE Model; assumed running speed of 40 MPH. Emissions reductions were applied to the length of I-10, as follows:
|
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | -678.573 kg/day (0.748 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $2,712,940 | $0 | $2,712,940 |
Assumes that project has benefits 260 days per year (all weekdays). Cost-effectiveness calculation will need to take into account the life of the capital equipment. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $2,712,940 | $0 | $2,712,940 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $443,109 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $2,712,940 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $2,712,940 |
NOTE: Assumption that 4.9% of freeway emissions are due to nonrecurring congestion is based on old source and there may be more recent data available. Calculation seems to assume 90% reduction in emissions associated with non-recurrent congestion, and it is not clear that the effectiveness of each ITS component should be additive.
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
The assumptions for input into TCM Tools included the expectation that the project will improve both peak and off-peak period speeds by 10% (from 19 to 21 mph), with an average daily traffic (ADT) of 200,000 in 2010. |
Δ Speed | + 2 mph | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 76 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 4 kg/day |
Emissions reductions calculated using the TCM Tools program created by Parsons Brinkerhoff and Sierra Research in 1994, which applies project data to the project year's (2004) MOBILE emissions factors and regional data to produce the emissions reductions for CO, VOCs, and NOx. |
Δ CO | - 939 kg/day | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 80 (kg/day) (0.088 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $998,037 | $1,001,963 | $2.0 M |
Total Project Cost: ~$2,000,000 (other funds in the project include other federal and State/local funds). Cost-effectiveness was not provided by the project sponsor. Project assumes benefits 252 days per year. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $998,037 | $1,001,963 | $2.0 M | ||
Total annualized public cost | $318,190 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $2.0 M | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $2.0 M |
NOTE: The CMAQ project amount in the CMAQ database is $862,192 for this project. Total project costs and CMAQ funding provided by the State were used to calculate the amounts in the table.
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | - 23,561 /day |
Length is 13.94 miles, 10.22 in Fairfield County and 3.72 miles in Greater Connecticut. The "Connecticut Freeway Management System" report documents the effects of incident management systems. Based on the report, this type of system will result in annual delay savings of 1.72 million vehicle hours (MVH) for a corridor length of 65 miles, based on a congested incident speed of 5 mph, and a free flow speed of 55 mph. The daily VMT traveled without an IM system in place is 1.72 MVH x 5 mph / 365 days = 23,561 VMT. |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 6.11 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 3.00 kg/day |
For Fairfield County:
For Greater Connecticut Area:
|
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | - 0.004 kg/day | |
Δ Total | - 9.11 kg/day (0.01 tpd) |
Project life: 10yrs | Interest rate: 7% | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $1,279,246 | $142,138 | $1,421,384 | ||
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $1,279,246 | $142,138 | $1,421,384 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $218,725 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $1,421,384 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $1,421,384 |
NOTE: Emissions reductions reported in CMAQ database differ from estimates provided or calculated from sponsor-provided documentation (-9.1 kg/day VOC, -4.6 kg/day NOx).
Δ Vehicle trips | NA | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | NA |
Incident Delay = Traffic volume * (Average number of blocked lanes during incidents / total lanes in corridor) * Incident duration Change in delay = Incident delay without project Incident delay with project |
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay: (vehicle hours/incident) | - 3,849 / incident | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 31.25 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 11.88 kg/day |
For each pollutant, the Change in delay * Emissions Factor / 1,000 * 111 annual incidents / 260 working days = kg of emissions reduced per day. |
Δ CO | NA | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | - 0.12 kg/day | |
Δ Total | -43.1 kg/day |
Project life: 1 yrs | Interest rate: 7 % | ||||
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Cost information is provided for 1 year of operating funding, or 260 days per year. Project sponsor calculated cost effectiveness as: the Annual project cost / (Emissions reduced * 260 days)
|
|
Adm/oper | $240,000 | $560,000 | $800,000 | ||
Total | $240,000 | $560,000 | $800,000 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $800,000 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $800,000 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $800,000 |
Δ Vehicle trips | - 2,929 /day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ VMT | - 58,589 /day |
|
Δ Speed | NA | |
Δ Delay | NA | |
Δ SOV | NA | |
Δ CP/VP | NA | |
Δ Transit | NA | |
Δ Walk | NA | |
Δ Bike | NA |
Δ VOC | - 68.78 kg/day | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: |
---|---|---|
Δ NOx | - 135.32 kg/day |
Emissions reductions calculated using Mobile6 running emissions factors, assuming a 43 mph running speed on freeways before the project = NOx: 1.22 and VOC 0.53 grams/mile. Speed-based running exhaust emissions factor for the HOV facility, assuming a 51 mph speed = NOx: 1.32 and VOC 0.51 grams/mile. Speed-based running exhaust emissions factor for general purpose lanes, assuming a 43 mph speed = NOx: 1.22 and VOC 0.53 grams/mile. Calculate change in running exhaust emissions from vehicles shifting from general purpose lanes to HOV lanes. Assume Average Peak Traffic on HOV lanes after project is 783 vehicles/hour and 6 peak hours per day. The HOV length is 20.9 miles. Calculate change in running exhaust emissions from vehicles in general purpose lanes as a result of vehicles shifted away from general purpose lanes. Assume Average Peak Traffic on general purpose lane before project is 10,358 vehicles/hour and the Average Peak Traffic on general purpose lane after project is 10,797 vehicles/hour. Calculate the reduction in auto start emissions from trip reductions using an auto trip end emissions factor for NOx: 0.39 grams/mile and VOC: 1.25 grams/mile and the trip reductions. Calculate the reduction in auto running exhaust emissions from trip reductions using the emissions factor before project implementation and the vehicle miles reduced. |
Δ CO | Kg | |
Δ PM10 | NA | |
Δ PM2.5 | NA | |
Δ Total | - 204.10 kg/day (0.22 tpd) |
Project life: 20 yrs | Interest rate: 7 % | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMAQ | NON-CMAQ | TOTAL | METHODOLOGY/ASSUMPTIONS: | ||
Capital | $17.152 M | $237,418,093 | $254,570,093 |
The funding details for this project are as follows: $254,570,093 total at letting ($229,853,137 Category 2 funds (NHS account in Texas), $17,152,000 CMAQ, $4,288,000 State funds, $122,856 TxDOT Green Ribbon Funds, and $3,154,100 local). A cost effectiveness calculation was not provided by the project sponsor. |
|
Adm/oper | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Total | $17.152 M | $237,418,093 | $254,570,093 | ||
Total annualized public cost | $28,194,000 | ||||
Annual revenues | None | ||||
Net public cost | $254,570,093 | ||||
Annual private cost | NA | ||||
Total net cost | $254,570,093 |