The Implementation of Full Depth UHPC Waffle Bridge Deck Panels Final Report May 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Introduction
- Work Completed In Phase 1
- Work Completed In Phase 2
- Life Cycle Cost Analysis
- References
Appendix: Plans for Little Cedar Creek Bridge, Wapello County, IA
Table 1. | Structural test protocols and sequence. |
---|---|
Table 2. | Sand patch test results. |
Table 3. | Skid resistance test results. |
Table 4. | User costs for the demonstration bridge and the CIP bridge. |
Table 5. | LCCA summary: demonstration bridge. |
Table 6. | LCCA summary: CIP bridge |
AASHTO | American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials |
---|---|
BPN | British Pendulum Number |
BPT | British Pendulum Tester |
CIP | Cast-in-Place |
DOT | Department of Transportation |
EDC | Every Day Counts |
FHWA | Federal Highway Administration |
LCCA | Life Cycle Cost Analysis |
LRFD | Load Cycle Cost Analysis |
PPE | Personal Protective Equipment |
SRV | Skid Resistance Value |
TRRL | Transport and Road Research Laboratory |
UHPC | Ultra High Performance Concrete |
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No. FHWA-HIF-13-031 |
2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | ||
4. Title and Subtitle The Implementation of Full Depth UHPC Waffle Bridge Deck Panels: Final Report |
5. Report Date May 2013 |
|||
6. Performing Organization Code | ||||
7. Author(s) John Heimann |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | |||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Coreslab Structures (Omaha), Inc. 802 Allied Rd. Bellevue, NE 68123 |
10. Work Unit No.(TRAIS) | |||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-09-G-00006 |
||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Federal Highway Administration Highways for LIFE Program – HIHL-1 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report, 6/15/2009 – 1/31/2013 |
|||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code | ||||
15. Supplementary Notes |
||||
16. Abstract
In the U.S. today, there are over 160,000 bridges that are structurally deficient or obsolete, and more than 3,000 new bridges are added each year. Federal, State, and municipal bridge engineers are seeking new ways to build better bridges, reduce travel times, and improve repair techniques, thereby reducing maintenance. Additionally, owners are challenged with replacing critical bridge components, particularly bridge decks, during limited or overnight road closure periods. State and Federal agencies are gaining significant interest in using full depth ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) waffle deck panels as a possible solution to these challenges. The first implementation of UHPC deck panels on a U.S. roadway was made possible through a grant from the Federal Highway Administration’s Highways for LIFE program. The objective of this research is to confirm that this system is a viable solution to the problems encountered by design engineers. It is hoped that the full depth UHPC bridge deck system will revolutionize the way bridges are designed in North America. This project was divided into two phases. Phase 1 included the design and testing of a mock-up bridge section for verifying design assumptions, as well as for evaluating the feasibility of manufacturing and installing the deck elements. Phase 2 consisted of the construction of a full scale two-lane bridge on a secondary road in Wapello County, Iowa, using prestressed concrete girders and 14 UHPC deck panels. |
||||
17. Key Words UHPC, Waffle Slab, Bridge Deck, Highways for LIFE |
18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. |
|||
19. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
20. No. of Pages |
21. No. of Pages 66 |
22. Price |
FORM DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) REPRODUCTION OF COMPLETED PAGE AUTHORIZED.
APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS | APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol | Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol |
LENGTH | LENGTH | ||||||||
in | inches | 25.4 | millimeters | mm | mm | millimeters | 0.039 | inches | in |
ft | feet | 0.305 | meters | m | m | meters | 3.28 | feet | ft |
yd | yards | 0.914 | meters | m | m | meters | 1.09 | yards | yd |
mi | miles | 1.61 | kilometers | km | km | kilometers | 0.621 | miles | mi |
AREA | AREA | ||||||||
in2 | square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | mm2 | mm2 | square millimeters | 0.0016 | square inches | in2 |
ft2 | square feet | 0.093 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 10.764 | square feet | ft2 |
yd2 | square yards | 0.836 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 1.195 | square yards | yd2 |
ac | acres | 0.405 | hectares | ha | ha | hectares | 2.47 | acres | ac2 |
mi2 | square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | km2 | km2 | square kilometers | 0.386 | square miles | mi2 |
VOLUME | VOLUME | ||||||||
fl oz | fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | ml | mL | milliliters | 0.034 | fluid ounces | fl oz |
gal | gallons | 3.785 | liters | L | L | liters | 0.264 | gallons | gal |
ft3 | cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 35.314 | cubic feet | ft3 |
yd3 | cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 1.307 | cubic yard | yd3 |
NOTE: Volumes greater than 1000 l shall be shown in m3 | |||||||||
MASS | MASS | ||||||||
oz | ounces | 28.35 | grams | g | g | grams | 0.035 | ounces | oz |
lb | pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kg | kg | kilograms | 2.202 | pounds | lb |
T | short tons (2000 lb) |
0.907 | megagrams | Mg | Mg (or "t") | megagrams (or "metric ton") |
1.103 | short tons (2000 lb) | T |
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | ||||||||
°F | Fahrenheit | 5(F–32)/9 or (F–32)/1.8 | Celcius | °C | °C | Celsius | 1.8C +32 | Fahrenheit | °F |
ILLUMINATION | ILLUMINATION | ||||||||
fc | foot–candles | 10.76 | lux | lx | lx | lux | 0.0929 | foot–candles | fc |
fl | foot–Lamberts | 3.426 | candela/m2 | cd/m2 | cd/m2 | candela/m2 | 0.2919 | foot–Lamberts | fl |
FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | ||||||||
lbf | pounds | 4.45 | newtons | N | N | newtons | 0.225 | poundforce | lbf |
lbf/in2 | pound per square inch | 6.89 | kilopascals | kPa | kPa | kilopascals | 0.145 | poundforce per square inch | lbf/in2 |
*SI is the symbol for the International System of Units. Appropriate rounding should be made to comply with Section 4 of ASTM E380. (Revised March 2003)