U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
breadcrumb |
Publication Number: FHWA-RD-02-107 |
Electrochemical Chloride Extraction: Influence of Concrete Surface on TreatmentPDF Version (25 MB)
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader® |
FORWARD
Many now recognize that once chloride-induced corrosion of the reinforcing steel bars has initiated in a concrete bridge, the only truly effective means of stopping corrosion in the structure is by applying either cathodic protection or the relatively new electrochemical chloride extraction. In addition to providing some beneficial effects to a treated concrete bridge, electrochemical chloride extraction offers some advantages over the use of cathodic protection. Electrochemical chloride extraction extends the functional life of the treated structure, but does not require the long-term commitment generally required of cathodic protection systems. However, both cathodic protection and electrochemical chloride extraction are operated without requiring the excavation of structurally sound concrete that is contaminated with chlorides. This can provide an advantage that does not exist with other restoration techniques.
To facilitate wider application of electrochemical chloride extraction in the rehabilitation of concrete bridges, this investigation was initiated with the objectives of improving the effectiveness of the treatment and contributing to the determination of additional service life that results from treating a structure. This interim report describes the progress made in ascertaining the cause of the abrupt drop in the amount of current that can pass through salt-contaminated concrete. This reduction in current, typically observed during the first several days of treatment, in turn relates to a decrease in chloride removal.
T. Paul Teng, P.E.
Director, Office of Infrastructure
Research and Development
NOTICE
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of this document.
Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No. FHWA-RD-02-107 | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
4. Title and Subtitle ELECTROCHEMICAL CHLORIDE EXTRACTION: INFLUENCE OF CONCRETE SURFACE ON TREATMENT | 5. Report Date | ||
6. Performing Organization Code | |||
7. Author(s) Stephen R. Sharp,* Gerry G. Clemeña,* Y. Paul Virmani,** Glenn E. Stoner,*** Robert G. Kelly *** | 8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Virginia Transportation Research Council 530 Edgemont Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 | 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) | ||
11. Contract or Grant No. | |||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Federal Highway Administration 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, Virginia 22102-2296 | 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Interim Report | ||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
15. Supplementary Notes * Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 229031 ** Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, 6300 Georgetown Pike, McLean, VA 22101-2296 *** University of Virginia, Material Science and Engineering, Charlottesville, VA 22903 Drs. O. M. Schneider and C. A. Dukes, and Messrs. C. M. Apusen, L. E. Dougald, and B. T. Ward, and Ms. E. F Aiken are each recognized for their contributions to this project | |||
16. Abstract One bridge restoration technique available for reducing corrosion-induced concrete deterioration, which removes chloride ions while simultaneously realkalizing the concrete adjacent to the steel, is electrochemical chloride extraction (ECE). Studies have shown that ECE is capable of removing, in a single application, a significant portion of the chloride ions from a reinforced concrete structure. Prior research has also shown that the quantity of chloride ions removed is dependent on numerous factors including quantity and spacing of reinforcing steel, applied voltage, initial chloride concentration, etc. In addition, investigations into chloride binding and competition between other ions as current carriers have helped to clarify the probable mechanisms responsible for decreases in current efficiency with time during chloride removal. This portion of the investigation has focused on the influence of water-to cement (w/c) ratio. In addition, an investigation was conducted to identify the cause of decrease in efficiency during chloride removal. A clear relationship between the w/c ratio and the chloride extraction rate was not evident. However, the investigation revealed that the resistance of the concrete surface layer increases considerably during ECE, which effectively restricts the current flow, while the resistance of the underlying layer of concrete either decreases or remains constant. It appears that the increased resistance of the surface layer concrete is accompanied by the formation of a tightly adhering residue on the concrete surface. Preliminary analysis of the surface formation indicates it contains calcium carbonate and calcium chloride. | |||
17. Key Words Cathodic protection, chloride ions, electrochemical chloride extraction, rehabilitation of concrete bridges, reinforced concrete, removal of chloride, steel corrosion in concrete. | 18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available to the public through NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161. | ||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified | 20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified | 21. No. of Pages 49 | 22. Price |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
SI* (Modern Metric) Conversion Factors