U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-11-045    Date:  November 2012
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-11-045
Date: November 2012

 

Performance Testing for Superpave and Structural Validation

REFERENCES

  1. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 1-37(A). (2004). Mechanistic-Empirical Design Guide of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/mepdg/home.htm.

  2. AASHTO M 320. (2009). Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  3. AASHTO T 313. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  4. AASHTO T 314. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Fracture Properties of Asphalt Binder in Direct Tension (DT), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  5. AASHTO T 315. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  6. Petersen, J.C., Robertson, R., Brenthaver, J., Harnsberger, P.M., Duval, J., Kim, S., Anderson, D., Christensen, D., and Bahia, H. (1994). Binder Characterization and Evaluation, Volume 1, Report No. SHRP A-367, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  7. Kennedy, T.W, Cominsky, R.J., Harrigan, E., and Leahy, R. (1990). The SHRP Asphalt Research Program: 1990 Strategic Planning Document, Report No. SHRP-A/UWP-90-007, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  8. Anderson, D., Christensen, D., Bahia, H., Dongre, R., Sharma, M., Antle, C., and Button, J. (1994). Binder Characterization and Evaluation, Volume 3: Physical Characterization, Report No. SHRP A-369, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  9. Hveem, F., Zube, E., and Skog, J. (1960). "Progress Report on the Zaca-Wigmore Experimental Asphalt Test Project," Symposium on Road and Paving Materials, 1959, ASTM STP 277, American Society for Testing and Materials, Baltimore, MD.

  10. Skog, J.B. (1981). "Effect of Changes in Asphalt Properties on Pavement Performance: Zaca-Wigmore Test Road," Asphalt Paving Technology, Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Technical Session, Vol. 50.

  11. Deacon, J.A., Tayebali, A., Coplantz, J., Finn, F., and Monismith, C. (1994). Fatigue Response of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixes; Part III: Mix Design and Analysis, ReportNo. SHRP A-404, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  12. Asphalt Research Program, University of California, Berkley. (1994). Permanent Deformation Response of Asphalt Aggregate Mixes, Report No. SHRP A-415, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  13. Strategic Highway Research Program. (1994). Stage 1 Validation of the Relationship Between Asphalt Properties and Asphalt-Aggregate Mix Performance, Report No. SHRP A-398, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  14. Leahy, R.B., Monismith, C.L., and Lundy, J.L. (1995). "Performance-Based Properties of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures," Engineering Properties of Asphalt Mixtures and the Relationship to their Performance, ASTM STP 1265, G. Huber and D. Decker (Eds.), ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA.

  15. Lytton, R., Uzan, J., Fernando, E., Roque, R., Hiltunen, D., and Stoffels, S., (1993). Development and Validation of Performance Prediction Models and Specifications for Asphalt Binders and Paving Mixes, Report No. SHRP A-357, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  16. Stuart, K.D., Mogawer, W.S., and Romero, P. (2001). Validation of the Superpave Asphalt Binder Fatigue Cracking Parameter Using the FHWA’s Accelerated Loading, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-093, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  17. Stuart, K.D. and Mogawer, W.S. (1997). "Validation of Asphalt Binder and Mixture Tests that Predict Rutting Susceptibility Using the Federal Highway Administration’s Accelerated Loading Facility," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 66.

  18. Stuart, K.D., Mogawer, W.S., and Romero, P. (1999). Validation of Asphalt Binder and Mixture Tests That Measure Rutting Susceptibility Using the Accelerated Loading Facility, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-204, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  19. Kavanaugh, L. (2004). "A 9-Year Evaluation of Field Cracking and Rutting Performance of SPS-9 Superpave Experiment," Transportation Research Record 1896, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.

  20. Bahia, H., Hanson, D., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatri, M., and Anderson, R. (2001). Characterization of Modified Asphalt Binders in Superpave Mix Design, NCHRP Report 459, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.

  21. Deacon, J., Harvey, J., Tayebali, A., and Monismith, C. (1997). "Influence of Binder Loss Modulus on the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 66.

  22. Stuart, K.D., Youtcheff, J.S., and Mogawer, W.S. (2001). Understanding the Performance of Modified Asphalt Binders in Mixtures: Evaluation of Moisture Sensitivity, Report No. FHWA-RD-02-029, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  23. Arizona Test Method 714. (2006). Sampling and Sieving of Crumb Rubber, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, AZ.

  24. ASTM D6114/D6114M. (2009). Standard Specification for Asphalt-Rubber Binder, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  25. ASTM D5329. (2009). Standard Test Methods for Sealants and Fillers, Hot-Applied, for Joints and Cracks in Asphaltic and Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  26. ASTM D36/D36M. (2012). Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  27. ASTM D5. (2006). Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  28. Shenoy, A. (2001). "High Temperature Performance Grade Specification of Paving Asphalt from the Material’s Volumetric-Flow Rate," Materials and Structures, Vol. 24, No. 244.

  29. Shenoy, A. (2002). "A Method to Estimate the Rheological Properties of Aged Asphalt Binders Without Actually Aging Them," Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 64.

  30. Arizona Department of Transportation. (2008). "Section 413, Asphaltic Concrete (Asphalt-Rubber)," Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Phoenix, AZ.

  31. Bonaquist, R. (1992). An Assessment of the Increased Damage Potential of Wide Base Single Tires, Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 3.

  32. Sherwood, J. (2005). Ultra-Thin Whitetopping (UTW) Project, Accelerated Pavement Testing of Ultra-Thin Whitetopping Concrete Overlays, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/utwweb/. Site last accessed November 7, 2011.

  33. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Construction Technologies Laboratories, and The Asphalt Institute. (1990). Calibrated Mechanistic Structural Analysis Procedure for Pavements: Volume II, Appendices, NCHRP Project 1-26, Final Report. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  34. Anderson, D.A., Kilareski, W.P., and Siddiqui, Z. (1988). Pavement Testing Facility: Design and Construction, Report No. FHWA-RD-88-059, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  35. AASHTO T 99. (2010). Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) Rammer and a 305-mm (12-in.) Drop, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  36. AASHTO T 180. (2010). Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  37. AASHTO T 168. (2003). Standard Method of Test for Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  38. AASHTO T 248. (2011). Standard Method of Test for Reducing Samples of Aggregate to Testing Size, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  39. AASHTO T 30. (2010). Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  40. AASHTO T 308. (2010). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  41. AASHTO T 287. (2006). Standard Method of Test for Asphalt Binder Content of Asphalt Mixtures by the Nuclear Method, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  42. AASHTO T 209. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  43. AASHTO PP28. (2001). Standard Practice for Superpave Volumetric Design for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  44. ASTM D2950/D2950M. (2011). Standard Test Method for Density of Bituminous Concrete in Place by Nuclear Methods, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  45. AASHTO T 166. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  46. ASTM D3203/D3203M. (2011). Standard Test Method for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Bituminous Paving Mixtures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  47. FLH T 501-96. (1996). "Determining the Thickness of Compacted Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixture Specimens," Federal Lands Highway Field Materials Manual, Office of Federal Lands Highway, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  48. Arnold, T.S., Rozario-Ranasinghe, M., and Youtcheff, J. (2006). "Determination of Lime in Hot-Mix Asphalt," Transportation Research Record 1962, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.

  49. Qi, X., Gibson, N., and Youtcheff, J. (2008). Fatigue Cracking Characteristics of Accelerated Testing Pavements with Modified Binders, Proceedings of the Sixth RILEM International Conference on Cracking in Pavements, June 16–18, Chicago, IL.

  50. Youtcheff, J., Stuart, K., Al-Khateeb, G., and Shenoy, A. (2004). Understanding the Performance of Polymer Modified Binders, Proceedings of the Eurasphalt and Eurobitme Congress, May 12–14, Vienna, Austria.

  51. AASHTO T 331. (2010). Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using Automatic Vacuum Sealing Method, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  52. Kendall, M. and Gibbons, J. (1996). Rank Correlation Methods, Fifth Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

  53. Washington, S., Leonard, J., Manning, D.G., Roberts, C., Williams, B., and Bacchus, A.R. (2001). NCHRP 20-45—Statistics for Transportation Researchers, Scientific Approaches to Transportation Research, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/cd-22/readme.html. Site last accessed November 7, 2011.

  54. Bari, J. (2006). Development of a New Revised Version of the Witczak E* Predictive Models for Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures, Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.

  55. Washington State Department of Transportation. (2005). Everseries User’s Guide, Pavement Analysis Computer Software and Case Studies. Obtained from: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Business/MaterialsLab/Pavements/PavementDesign.htm#FWD. Site last accessed November 7, 2011.

  56. AASHTO TP 79-09. (2009). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  57. Thyagarajan, S., Sivaneswaran, N., Muhunthan, B., and Petros, K. (2009). "An Evaluation of the Effects of Nonlinear Load-Strain Behavior on MEPDG Analysis of Flexible Pavements," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78.

  58. Peterson, R.L., Mahboub, K.C., Anderson, R.M., Masad, E., and Tashman, L. (2004). "Comparing Superpave Gyratory Compactor Data to Field Cores," Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, January/February.

  59. Hunter, A.E., Airey, G.D., and Collop, A.C. (2004). "Aggregate Orientation and Segregation in Laboratory-Compacted Asphalt Samples," Transportation Research Record 1891, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  60. Wang, W. and Hoeg, K. (2009). "Method of Compaction has Significant Effects on Stress-Strain Behavior of Hydraulic Asphalt Concrete," ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Volume 37, No. 3.

  61. Linden R.N., Mahoney, J.P., and Jackson, N.C. (1989). "Effect of Compaction on Asphalt Concrete Performance," Transportation Research Record 1217, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  62. Abd El Halim, A.O., and Haas, R. (1994). "Effect of Field Compaction Method on Fatigue Life of Asphalt Pavements," Transportation Research Record 1469, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  63. Christensen, D., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R. (2003). "Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72.

  64. Witczak, M.W., Kaloush, K., Pellinen, T., El-Basyouny, M., and Von Quintus, H. (2002). NCHRP Report 465: Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  65. Martono, W. and Bahia, H. (2008). Developing a Surrogate Test for Fatigue of Asphalt Binders, Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Washington, DC.

  66. Shenoy, A. (2002). "Fatigue Testing and Evaluation of Asphalt Binders Using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer," ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation 30(4), ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA.

  67. Andriescu, A., Hesp, S.A.M., and Youtcheff, J.S. (2004). "Essential and Plastic Works of Ductile Fracture in Asphalt Binders," Transportation Research Record 1875, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  68. Broberg, K.B. (1975). "On Stable Crack Growth," Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 23, Issue 3.

  69. Cotterell, B. and Reddel, J.K. (1977). "The Essential Work of Plane Stress Ductile Fracture." International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 13, Issue 3.

  70. Mai, Y.W. and Cotterell, B. (1980). "Effects of Pre-Strain on Plane Stress Ductile Fracture in α-brass," Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 15, No. 9.

  71. MOT LS-299. (2009). "Method of Test for Determining Asphalt Cement’s Resistance to Fatigue Fracture Using Double Edge Notched Tension Test (DENT)," MTO Laboratory Testing Manual, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Downsview, ON.

  72. Johnson, C., Wen, H., and Bahia, H. (2009). "Practical Application of Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Theory to Asphalt Binder Fatigue Characterization," Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 78.

  73. AASHTO TP 70. (2012). Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  74. Dongré, R., D’Angelo, J., Baumgardner, G., and Reinke, G. (2003). New Developments in Refinement of the Superpave High Temperature Specification Parameter, 40th Annual Meeting of the Petersen Asphalt Research Conference, Laramie, WY.

  75. Dongré, R.N. and D’Angelo, J.A. (2004). New Criterion for Superpave High-Temperature Binder Specification, 83d Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  76. ASTM D5976. (2000). Standard Specification for Type I Polymer Modified Asphalt Cement for Use in Pavement Construction, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  77. AASHTO T 51. (2009). Standard Method of Test for Ductility of Asphalt Materials, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  78. Shenoy, A. (2001). "Refinement of the Superpave Specification Parameter for Performance Grading of Asphalt," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, Issue 5.

  79. Shenoy, A. (2004). "High Temperature Performance Grading of Asphalts Through a Specification Criterion that Could Capture Field Performance," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, Issue 1.

  80. Shenoy, A (2004). "A Comprehensive Treatise of the High Temperature Specification Parameter," Applied Rheology, Vol. 14, Issue 6.

  81. Shenoy, A. (2008). "Nonrecovered Compliance from Dynamic Oscillatory Test Vis-a-Vis Nonrecovered Compliance from Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test in the Dynamic Shear Rheometer," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 9, Issue 5.

  82. Rowe, G.M., D’Angelo, J., and Sharrock, M.J. (2002). Use of the Zero Shear Viscosity as a Parameter for the High Temperature Binder Specification Parameter, 3d International Symposium on Binder Rheology and Pavement Performance, San Antonio, TX.

  83. D’Angelo, J. and Dongré, R. (2004). Multi-Stress Creep Recovery: A New Approach to the Refinement of High Temperature Binder Specification, 41st Annual Meeting of the Petersen Asphalt Research Conference, Cheyenne, WY.

  84. Dongré, R.N. and D’Angelo, J.A. (2006). Development of a High Temperature Performance-Based Specification in the United States, 10th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Quebec, Canada.

  85. Shenoy, A. (2001). "High Temperature Performance Grade Specification of Asphalt Binder from the Material’s Volumetric-Flow Rate," Materials and Structures, Vol. 34.

  86. Shenoy, A. (2000). "Material’s Volumetric-Flow Rate (MVR) as a Unification Parameter in Asphalt Rheology and Quality Control/Quality Assurance Tool for High Temperature Performance Grading," Applied Rheology, Vol. 10, Issue 6.

  87. ASTM D1238. (2010). Standard Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  88. AASHTO T 324. (2011). Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  89. AASHTO TP 7-94. (1994). Test Method for Determining the Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Cracking Characteristics of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Simple Shear Test (SST) Device, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  90. National Cooperative Highway Research Program NCHRP 09-30A. (Active). Calibration of Rutting Models for HMA Structural and Mix Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=965. Site last accessed November 7, 2011.

  91. Gibson N., Kutay M.E., Keramat D., and Youtcheff J. (2009). "Multiaxial Strain Response of Asphalt Concrete Measure During Flow Number Simple Performance Test," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78.

  92. Kim, R., Guddati, M.N., Underwood, B.S., Yun, T.Y., Subramanian, V.,and Savadatti, S. (2009). Development of a Multiaxial VEPCD-FEP++: Final Report, Report No. FHWA-HRT-08-073, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  93. Zhou, F., Hu, S., Chen, D., and Scullion, T. (2007). "Overlay Tester—Simple Performance Test for Fatigue Cracking," Transportation Research Record 2001, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  94. AASHTO T 322. (2007). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Creep Compliance and Strength of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Indirect Tensile Test Device, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  95. AASHTO TP 8-94. (1994). Standard Test Method for Determination of the Fatigue Life of Compacted HMA Subjected to Repeated Flexural Bending, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  96. Witczak, M.W. (2005). NCHRP Report 547: Simple Performance Tests: Summary of Recommended Methods and Database, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  97. Lee, H.J. and Kim, Y.R. (1998). "Viscoelastic Constitutive Model for Asphalt Concrete Under Cyclic Loading," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 124, No. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  98. Lee, H.J. and Kim, Y.R. (1998). "Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model for Asphalt Concrete with Healing," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 124, No. 11, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  99. Christensen, D. and Bonaquist, R. (2005). "Practical Application of Continuum Damage Theory to Fatigue Phenomena in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 74.

  100. Kutay, M.E., Gibson, N.H., and Youtcheff, J. (2008). "Conventional and Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD) Based Fatigue Analysis of Polymer Modified Asphalt Pavements," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 77.

  101. Christensen, D. and Bonaquist, R. (2008). "Analysis of HMA Fatigue Data Using the Concepts of Reduced Loading Cycles and Endurance Limit," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78.

  102. Kutay, M.E., Gibson, N.H., Dongre, R., and Youtcheff, J. (2009). "Use of Small Samples to Predict Fatigue Lives of Field Cores-Newly Developed Formulation Based on Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Theory," Transportation Research Record 2127, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  103. Hou, T., Underwood, B.S., and Kim, Y.R. (2010). "Fatigue Performance Prediction of North Carolina Mixtures Using the Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model," Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80.

  104. Andriescu, A. (2006). Essential Work of Fracture Approach to Fatigue Grading of Asphalt Binders. Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario.

  105. Huber, G. (2009). Evaluation of Low Temperature Cracking of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements in Ontario, A report prepared for The Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and Ontario Hot Mix Producers Association, Ontario, Canada.

  106. AASHTO T 300. (2011). Standard Method of Test for Force Ductility Test of Asphalt Materials, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

 

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101