Introduction to Tax Increment Financing

« PreviousNext »

5. Legal and Regulatory Issues

Ensuring Appropriate Legal Authority

State legislation typically establishes:

  • Criteria for establishing a TIF district including:
    • Underlying economic conditions
    • The types of jurisdictions that can establish a TIF
    • And, in some cases, a “but for” requirement related to the necessity of a public infrastructure project to catalyze private development.
  • A list of revenue streams that can be utilized for TIF purposes.
  • Rules for benchmarking the revenue stream(s) and defining the tax increment.
  • Permissible activities that a TIF district might pursue to catalyze private development

Establish Required Findings:

Typically, an implementing jurisdiction must make findings to show:

  • The State-established criteria exist for establishing a TIF, including the “but for” analysis if required;
  • A designation of revenue streams to be benchmarked and utilized according to the State law.
  • A proposed TIF project will catalyze development and increase revenues within the designated area sufficient to cover the TIF-designated portion of the project costs
  • A Redevelopment Plan consistent with State criteria and procedures to ensure that the TIF project fosters the desired development.

Key Legal Issues

Spending Public Funds for Private Gain

  • Many States prohibit spending public funds to create private gains.
  • TIF enabling statutes will carve out an exception for TIF activities or distinguish TIF activities so that they do not fall into this prohibited category.
  • Jurisdictions seeking to establish a TIF will follow State guidance scrupulously to avoid illegal conduct.

Takings

  • Some TIF development plans entail the use of eminent domain to assemble properties for development.
  • Strict adherence to substantive and procedural due process is required.

Inappropriate Diversion of General Fund Revenues

  • If other taxing jurisdictions (e.g., a school district) rely on revenues from taxes or fees that have been designated for TIF, they might believe that a TIF will divert revenues that they rely upon for up to 10 to 25 years.
  • These jurisdictions might be motivated to sue the TIF-creating jurisdiction and often have the resources to hire legal counsel.

Surviving Legal Challenges

  • Strict Adherence to Requirements in State TIF Enabling Legislation:
    • Local governments’ experience suggests that it is beneficial to document the investigation (process and results) about whether an area and a TIF project satisfy the statutory criteria for TIF formation.
  • Judicial Standard of Review:
    • Courts will NOT second-guess legislative findings as long as a good-faith effort was made to investigate and evaluate legally mandated criteria.
    • However, courts might invalidate findings if the findings lack evidence or are based upon spurious evidence.

« PreviousNext »