U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
The Policy and Strategy Analysis Team was created in 2018, combining three existing teams, to provide analytical support and strategy formulation in the evaluation of FHWA policies and programs.
The team takes a data-analytic approach to understanding how travel behavior changes in response to changes within the transportation sector (travel options, technologies, performance, and costs) and underlying socio-demographic, regional, and economic trends. The team assesses both business-as-usual and disruptive future transportation needs to support both strategic planning and policy analyses. This team is positioned to provide more agile analyses of emerging issues and policy options as well as more insightful context for setting and understanding performance measures.
The Team is responsible for research into the following subject areas: multimodal transportation policy analysis, highway cost allocation, highway taxation and revenue analysis, transportation related innovation and technologies issues, international competition, external costs and benefits of highway transportation, megaregions, societal impacts related to highway construction, and correlations between highway investment, employment, and economic productivity.
The Team's research on the above subject areas help guide public policies and programs such as energy policies, market-based demand strategies, and identification and assessment of any other emerging issues that may affect transportation policy.
This work includes leading, managing and performing a variety of duties, involving the monitoring and forecasting of economic, demographic, finance, environmental, energy and travel trends.
The policy issues associated with vehicles automation and wireless communication- The Policy Analysis and Development Team is an active participant in conducting research in transportation related technologies. This team is responsible for conducting two studies in this area:
Incorporating Connected/ Automated vehicles in Transportation planning processes and products – The purpose of this project is to help facilitate incorporating of C/AV in transportation planning processes and products. This study evaluates the impacts of C/AV on planning tools, techniques and data and identifies skills, expertise and training required at the state DOTs and MPOs level to successfully prepare for incorporating this technology in planning processes. This project was initiated in fall 2014 and completed in summer 2016.
Transportation Scenario Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles - The purpose of this study is to use the scenario planning process to develop several descriptive futures (scenarios) of the deployment, market uptake, use, and impacts of CV and AV technologies. The deliverables of this study will include the future scenario outcomes, a high-level assessment of these futures, and an illustration of how agencies can use scenario planning to develop their own, more localized future CV / AV scenarios. State and regional agencies may use this illustrative scenario planning process to anticipate likely issues and challenges they will face due to CV / AV adoption.
Successful Jurisdictional Approaches to Megaregion Planning - Megaregions are a growing geography in the United States with shared transportation, economic, and natural resource requirements. Megaregion transportation planning requires the involvement and cooperation of multiple jurisdictions to manage and plan for improvements to the transportation system.
The emphasis of this study is to identify and review successful jurisdictional and organizational approaches that can be applied to megaregion transportation planning and the associated roles and responsibilities for all partners.
Some questions the study will answer include:
What would a successful megaregion transportation regime look like?
Is there a need for such a regime since there are existing MPOs and State, local and Federal transportation planning organizations?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of transportation planning in regional governance?
Are there examples of current megaregion transportation planning in the United States and / or internationally?
The purpose of the study is as follows: (1) explore the roles that national, State, regional and local stakeholders would play in a megaregion transportation planning regime; (2) identify two to three examples of successful models of multi-State or interregional organizations (non-transportation related) from which best practices can be borrowed; and (3) make recommendations for a successful megaregion transportation planning regime, including outreach materials for transportation stakeholders.
Framework and Assessment of Resiliency of the National Highway System - The purpose of this research is to: (1) summarize the literature with respect to defining, assessing and using resiliency analysis techniques to manage road networks; (2) identify and analyze associated measures that will help to assess the resiliency of the national road network infrastructure; (3) create a PPD-21-based definition of resilience for highway systems; and (4) develop recommendations that could help alleviate vulnerabilities to improve system integrity of three resilience case studies.
As transportation infrastructure requirements continue to grow, strategies which seek to prioritize investment alternatives and allocate funding to those investments that will deliver the greatest overall benefit become increasingly important. While this research will focus on the resiliency of the National Highway System (NHS), it is also imperative to include a discussion of how disruptions to other parts of the transportation network (i.e. air, maritime, and transit) would impact the operation of the NHS. For example, if there is an event that takes a corridor offline for a period of time, what is the effect on nearby sections of the NHS? What factors should be included in the development of a remediation plan for the NHS? How specific should such plans be? This work should also consider any performance management activities of the Strategic Highway Research Program 2, such as those related to reliability and risk management.
Highway Impacts on Communities: An Assessment - This research will empirically assess the economic and social effects of Federal-aid highway projects on neighborhoods of differing social and economic demographics. Specifically, using comparative statistics, the study will explore: (1) the socioeconomic composition of communities in close proximity to approved Federal-aid highway projects; (2) how the socioeconomic composition of these communities changed in the short-, mid-, and long-term once the project commenced; and (3) whether these patterns have changed significantly as Federal policy addressing community input and equity has evolved.
To accomplish this, this study will identify a statistically valid sample of highway adjacent communities reflecting a range of socio-economic characteristics as well as a control sample of non-highway adjacent communities. The sample will address communities located near rural, suburban, and urban Federal-aid highway projects undertaken at different points over the history of the Federal-Aid Highway Program and in different geographic regions across the United States.
This study will provide the FHWA with an improved empirical understanding of the extent
to which federal-aid highway projects, overall, may disproportionately affect nearby communities and whether these differential effects have declined since this suite of Federal policy choices has taken place.
Other secondary questions this research may address empirically include:
To what extent has there been a measurable change in the socio-economic characteristics of the communities in which Federal-aid highway projects are sited?
Have the reported bases for the final location for proposed projects changed over this period?
Has there been a measurable change in the level or nature of project elements intended to mitigate community impacts associated with Federal-aid highway location? Can these features be statistically correlated with reduced community impacts?
How does the presence of Federal-aid highways affect community access to services and amenities, walkability, livability, or community cohesion?
Highway Revenue Forecasting Model (HRFM) - The Policy and Strategy Analysis Team is currently updating the model. The HRFM is used for analyzing and forecasting highway revenues from existing highway user fees for different vehicle classes and weight groups. The model is capable of analyzing user fee options to understand the equity of the highway user fee structure and revenue forecasts under different policy scenarios. Outputs from this model are primarily used for conducting highway cost allocation (HCA) studies (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/hcas/final/). The model has also the capability to estimate revenues from other potential revenue raising policy options, such as a weight distance tax, a mileage based tax, and an emission based tax.
National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI) - The NHCCI is a price index that can be used for tracking price changes associated with highway construction materials costs, and for converting current dollar spending on highway construction to real dollars. The NHCCI is produced quarterly, and can be accessed at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/nhcci.cfm. The Policy Analysis and Development Team and the Office of Highway Policy Information have completed updating the NHCCI software, improving the estimation, and revising the index.
External Costs of Highway Users - External costs are unintended adverse impacts that users cause on other users and non-users. The major external costs of highway user are environmental impacts, traffic crashes (fatalities, injuries and property damage), congestion, and noise pollution. Highway users do not often pay for a large part of these costs, and thus they do not take such costs into account in their transportation decisions. The team is conducting research to develop methodology and analytical tools to estimate external costs of traffic congestion, crashes (fatalities, injuries and property damage), air pollution and greenhouse gases, and noise pollution by detailed vehicle class.
Marginal Cost of Highway Infrastructure - The Policy and Strategy Analysis Team conducts cost studies to analyze changes in infrastructure costs caused by users of the highway system, and other cost drivers. The team is currently developing methodology to estimate marginal cost estimates for highway infrastructure for the United States. The roads and streets differ widely in construction, maintenance, operation and rehabilitation costs and in the volume and type of traffic they carry. Therefore, the marginal cost estimates shall be prepared for different highway functional class, and rural urban highways.
Please direct all questions and comments to PolicyStudiesFeedback@dot.gov.