U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Policy and Governmental Affairs
Office of Highway Policy Information

FHWA Home / Policy & Governmental Affairs / Highway Policy Information / Office of Highway Policy Information

Office of Highway Policy Information (OHPI) – Travel Monitoring and Traffic Volume – Traffic Monitoring Guide

Traffic Monitoring Guide

Appendix H. TRAFFIC DATA FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

H.1 BACKGROUND

The goal of pavement design is to obtain a set of specific pavement construction parameters, such as types of construction material and construction methods; thickness of various courses, including base, structural layer; and a surface course to achieve pre-determined performance criteria. Traffic, climate, soil, and other geological data are typically used as inputs for pavement design. Traffic data shall cover the entire life expectancy, which is between the opening year and the last year of life expectancy (Figure H-1). The last year of life expectancy of pavement is often referred to as the design year.

FIGURE H-1 TEMPORAL DATA SEQUENCE

Temporal Data Sequence. This flow chart illustrates the temporal flow of traffic data used for pavement design. The four elements of the sequence are past traffic, current existing traffic, opening year traffic, and design year traffic. Past and current traffic data are indicated as coming from traffic monitoring, while opening year and design year traffic data are indicated as coming from traffic modeling.

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

Traditionally, traffic impact on pavement design is through the concept of equivalent single-axle loads (ESAL). ESAL is the equivalent number of 18,000 lbf (pound force) single-axle loads that would produce the same amount of damage over the pavement design life. Traffic modeling and design traffic professionals project cumulative ESAL data from all vehicles for the entire pavement life expectancy.

NCHRP Project 1-37A’s Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide enables a dynamic approach where pavement performance can be modeled with very specific traffic related parameters. The new process requires significant traffic data from demand forecasting professionals, which in turn necessitates significant field monitoring data.

The FHWA’s 13 vehicle category classification system relies on vehicle axle spacing to differentiate various vehicles. Vehicle data classified under this system are referred to as vehicle class information or data.

Vehicle axle configuration refers to the different axle configurations that a vehicle may have. Under each vehicle axle configuration, the weight on the axle/axles is called axle loading. Axle load reflects both the weight of a vehicle itself and the cargo it carries.

H.3 TRAFFIC DATA ASSOCIATED WITH ESAL

To design pavement for a travel lane, AASHTO’s Guide for Design of Pavement of Structures offers the formula for traffic data as listed below

TABLE H-1 TRAFFIC DATA SUMMARY
1 DL (lane splitting factor): traffic distribution among different lanes with the same travel direction by vehicle types
2 DD (directional factor): directional traffic split of a two way roads
3 AADT by vehicle types
4 AADT by axle weight by vehicle types

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

w18= DD × DL × W18

Where:

w18 is the ESAL for the design lane. W188 represents the ultimate traffic data needed for pavement design.

DD is the traffic directional factor for a two way roadway.

DL is a lane traffic splitting factor for a roadway having more than one lane in each direction.

W18 is cumulative two way ESAL projected for a roadway segment.

H.3.1 W18 – CUMULATIVE TWO WAY EASL

The W18 is the cumulative dual directional ESAL covering the entire life expectancy. To compute W18, data on number of axles for various axle configurations under various axle loads is needed. While the number of axles for various axle configurations under various axle loads can be obtained from traffic projection professionals, axle load equivalence factors are to be obtained from AASHTO’s Guide Appendix D.

H.3.2 ONE OF MANY POTENTIAL W18 COMPUTATION PROCEDURES

1. Obtain Column A, B, and C information from AASHTO’s Guide for Design of Pavement Structures Appendix D.

2. Fill out Column D with forecasted cumulative traffic measured in number of axles by axle load from traffic forecasting professionals.

3. Column E = Column C × Column D.

4. Summarize Column E to obtain the W18.

TABLE H-2 ESAL COMPUTATION ILLUSTRATION
A B C D E
AASHTO Guide Table Traffic Forecasting D × C
Axle Type Axle Loads (KIPS) Axle Load
Equivalence Factor
Cumulative
Number of Axle
ESALs
Single Axle 2.00 0.00 768,021 153.6
4.00 0.00 120,123,356 240,246.7
6.00 0.01 3,227,896,123 35,506,857.4
8.00 0.04 623,456,799 22,444,444.8
10.00 0.09 321,456,799 28,931,111.9
12.00 0.19 2,100,003 396,900.6
14.00 0.35 186,000,159 65,844,056.3
16.00 0.61 0 0.0
18.00 1.00 0 0.0
20.00 1.56 0 0.0
22.00 2.35 0 0.0
24.00 3.43 0 0.0
26.00 4.88 0 0.0
0 0.0
50.00 97.00 0 0.0
Tandem Axle 2.00 0.00 0 0.0
4.00 0.00 0 0.0
6.00 0.00 0 0.0
8.00 0.00 12,345,789 37,037.4
10.00 0.01 8,964,566 71,716.5
12.00 0.02 368,945 5,903.1
14.00 0.03 14,789 428.9
16.00 0.05 78,965,145 3,948,257.3
18.00 0.08 32,514,589 2,633,681.7
0 0.0
32.00 0.84 45,678,912 38,507,322.8
34.00 1.08 256,000 276,480.0
36.00 1.38 12,589,631 17,373,690.8
38.00 1.73 0 0.0
40.00 2.15 4,781,265 10,279,719.8
42.00 2.64 3,612,987 9,538,285.7
0 0.0
68.00 22.40 0 0.0
70.00 25.60 0 0.0
0 0.0
86.00 66.00 14,569,124 961,562,184.0
88.00 73.40 1,256,789 92,248,312.6
90.00 81.50 345,789 28,181,803.5
Cumulative ESAL 1,289,846,791.7

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

H.4 TRAFFIC DATA ASSOCIATED WITH MECHANISTIC AND EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN

NCHRP Project 1-37A’s Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide requires the extensive input of traffic data. The following are traffic data items required for the process

1. Opening Year Two-Way Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic

Two-way annual average daily truck traffic (AADTT) (trucks are referred to as FHWA’s class 4 to 13 vehicles) is needed for opening year condition. This data is used as the base for future growth projection. It is a projected traffic value done by a traffic forecasting professional.

2. Percent of Truck Traffic in Design Direction

2. Percent of Truck Traffic in Design Direction

3. Percent of Truck Traffic in Design Lane %

This is the percentage of truck traffic for the design lane. The design lane is typically the outside lane with a multilane highway (more than one lane in each travel direction). Trucks tend to operate away from the far inside lane, which is adjacent to the median or the center lane divide on a multilane roadway.

4. Truck Monthly Adjustment Factor (TMAF)

The Truck Monthly Adjustment Factor reflects truck travel patterns throughout the year. There are 10 truck types (FHWA vehicle class 4-13) that result 10 potential different temporal patterns over a 12 month period. Mathematically the monthly adjustment factor for a given vehicle class and a given month is obtained by dividing the average monthly average daily truck traffic (MADTT) for the month by the summation of all the 12 month MADTTs and then multiplied by 12. There are a total of 120 TMAFs [10 vehicle classes × 12 months = 120 individual TMAF].

The TMAF formula for vehicle class i and month k is TMAFik=[MADTTik/(∑(MADTT)i)] × 12.

TABLE H-3 ILLUSTRATION OF MAF COMPUTATION FROM MADTT
MADTT Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Class 8 Class 9 Class 10 Class 11 Class 12 Class 13
January 588 2,800 1,216 502 250 527 485 51 142 124
February 598 2,851 896 498 263 654 493 38 152 108
March 602 2,864 1,211 561 296 625 520 25 164 165
April 630 3,001 1,321 598 299 692 586 62 159 154
May 674 3,213 1,452 625 421 568 564 45 156 142
June 717 3,415 1,621 740 465 587 652 65 187 165
July 756 3,602 1,690 789 489 623 657 82 221 120
August 810 3,859 1,699 785 620 621 678 32 235 95
September 832 3,962 1,780 741 661 451 725 67 268 67
October 755 3,455 1,795 645 561 482 712 12 189 64
November 685 2,699 1,400 560 421 389 608 18 167 96
December 598 2,760 1,324 495 412 462 527 19 152 116
Total 8,245 38,481 17,405 7,539 5,158 6,681 7,207 516 2,192 1,416

TMAFij=MADTTij/[∑(MADTT)j] × 12 MAFij; MAFij is the monthly adjustment factor for month i and vehicle class j truck

MADTT Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Class 8 Class 9 Class 10 Class 11 Class 12 Class 13
January 0.86 0.87 0.84 0.80 0.58 0.95 0.81 1.19 0.78 1.05
February 0.87 0.89 0.62 0.79 0.61 1.17 0.82 0.88 0.83 0.92
March 0.88 0.89 0.83 0.89 0.69 1.12 0.87 0.58 0.90 1.40
April 0.92 0.94 0.91 0.95 0.70 1.24 0.98 1.44 0.87 1.31
May 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.02 0.94 1.05 0.85 1.20
June 1.04 1.06 1.12 1.18 1.08 1.05 1.09 1.51 1.02 1.40
July 1.10 1.12 1.17 1.26 1.14 1.12 1.09 1.91 1.21 1.02
August 1.18 1.20 1.17 1.25 1.44 1.12 1.13 0.74 1.29 0.81
September 1.21 1.24 1.23 1.18 1.54 0.81 1.21 1.56 1.47 0.57
October 1.10 1.08 1.24 1.03 1.31 0.87 1.19 0.28 1.03 0.54
November 1.00 0.84 0.97 0.89 0.98 0.70 1.01 0.42 0.91 0.81
December 0.87 0.86 0.91 0.79 0.96 0.83 0.88 0.44 0.83 0.98
Total 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

5. Vehicle Class Distribution

Vehicle class distribution (VCD) refers to AADTT distribution among the 10 vehicle types (FHWA’s 4 to 13 vehicle class). The percentage data are computed directly from vehicle classification data. There are 12 of such VCDs

TABLE H-4 VEHICLE CLASS DISTRIBUTION COMPUTATION ILLUSTRATION
Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Class 8 Class 9 Class 10 Class 11 Class 12 Class 13 Total
AADTT 235 654 961 1,620 1,240 654 598 103 1,245 4,621 11,931
% 2.0 5.5 8.1 13.6 10.4 5.5 5.0 0.9 10.4 38.7 100.0

Source: Federal Highway Administration

VCDj=AADTTj/∑(AADTT)j; VCDj is the truck distribution factor for vehicle class j truck

6. Truck Hourly Distribution Factor (THDF)

Truck hourly distribution factor refers to the percentage of hourly AADTT among a 24 hour period starting at midnight. There are 24 THDFs.

Start Time End Time Hourly Distribution
Hourly-AADTT %
00:00 01:00 8 0.6
01:00 02:00 9 0.7
02:00 03:00 12 0.9
03:00 04:00 16 1.3
04:00 05:00 25 2.0
05:00 06:00 36 2.8
06:00 07:00 45 3.5
07:00 08:00 68 5.3
08:00 09:00 78 6.1
09:00 10:00 76 5.9
10:00 11:00 78 6.1
11:00 12:00 82 6.4
12:00 13:00 98 7.7
13:00 14:00 98 7.7
14:00 15:00 86 6.7
15:00 16:00 88 6.9
16:00 17:00 74 5.8
17:00 18:00 78 6.1
18:00 19:00 64 5.0
19:00 20:00 52 4.1
20:00 21:00 54 4.2
21:00 22:00 26 2.0
22:00 23:00 18 1.4
23:00 24:00 10 0.8
Total 1,279 100.0

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

THDF%h=AADTTh/(AADTT); THDF%h is the truck distribution hourly factor for the hth hour of the day

7. Axle Load Factor

FHWA vehicles in class 4 to 13 can have a variety of axle configurations, including single axle, tandem axle, tridem axle, and quad axle. For a given vehicle class and axle configuration, axle weight varies depending on vehicle load. Axle Load Factor (ALF) is to capture that information in terms of distributions of vehicles based on axle weight under a given vehicle class and axle configuration for a given month. This is one of the most demanding data sets. Mathematically, the ALF is the percentage of a given axle load among all axle loads under a given vehicle axle configuration.

7a. Single Axle Configuration Axle Load Factor

There are 39 axle weight groups for single axle configuration vehicles. The axle weight group ranges from 3,000 lbs. to 41,000 lbs. with increments of 1,000 lbs. The computation of the axle load factor data is based on MADT for a particular vehicle class and axle weight group.

TABLE H-6 ILLUSTRATION OF SINGLE AXLE LOAD FACTORS FOR JANUARY, FEBRUARY AND DECEMBER
Month Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jany Jan Jan Jan Jan Feb Feb Dec
Vehicle Class 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 13
Axle Weight (lbs) 3,000 1.8 10.05 2.47 2.14 11.65 1.74 3.64 3.55 6.68 8.88 1.8 10.03 8.88
4,000 0.96 13.21 1.78 0.55 5.37 1.37 1.24 2.91 2.29 2.67 0.96 13.21 2.67
5,000 2.91 16.42 3.45 2.42 7.84 2.84 2.36 5.19 4.87 3.81 2.91 16.41 3.81
6,000 3.99 10.61 3.95 2.7 6.99 3.53 3.38 5.27 5.86 5.23 3.99 10.61 5.23
7,000 6.8 9.22 6.7 3.21 7.99 4.93 5.18 6.32 5.97 6.03 6.8 9.24 6.03
8,000 11.47 8.27 8.45 5.81 9.63 8.43 8.35 6.98 8.86 8.1 11.47 8.27 8.1
9,000 11.3 7.12 11.85 5.26 9.93 13.67 13.85 8.08 9.58 8.35 11.31 7.12 8.35
10,000 10.97 5.85 13.57 7.39 8.51 17.68 17.35 9.68 9.94 10.69 10.97 5.85 10.69
11,000 9.88 4.53 12.13 6.85 6.47 16.71 16.21 8.55 8.59 10.69 9.88 4.54 10.69
12,000 8.54 3.46 9.48 7.42 5.19 11.57 10.27 7.29 7.11 11.11 8.54 3.46 11.11
13,000 7.33 2.56 6.83 8.99 3.99 6.09 6.52 7.16 5.87 7.32 7.32 2.56 7.32
14,000 5.55 1.92 5.05 8.15 3.38 3.52 3.94 5.65 6.61 3.78 5.55 1.92 3.78
15,000 4.23 1.54 3.74 7.77 2.73 1.91 2.33 4.77 4.55 3.1 4.23 1.54 3.1
16,000 3.11 1.19 2.66 6.84 2.19 1.55 1.57 4.35 3.63 2.58 3.11 1.19 2.58
17,000 2.54 0.9 1.92 5.67 1.83 1.1 1.07 3.56 2.56 1.52 2.54 0.9 1.52
18,000 1.98 0.68 1.43 4.63 1.53 0.88 0.71 3.02 2 1.32 1.98 0.68 1.32
19,000 1.53 0.52 1.07 3.5 1.16 0.73 0.53 2.06 1.54 1 1.53 0.52 1
20,000 1.19 0.4 0.82 2.64 0.97 0.53 0.32 1.63 0.98 0.83 1.19 0.4 0.83
21,000 1.16 0.31 0.64 1.9 0.61 0.38 0.29 1.27 0.71 0.64 1.16 0.31 0.64
22,000 0.66 0.31 0.49 1.31 0.55 0.25 0.19 0.76 0.51 0.38 0.66 0.31 0.38
23,000 0.56 0.18 0.38 0.97 0.36 0.17 0.15 0.59 0.29 0.52 0.56 0.18 0.52
24,000 0.37 0.14 0.26 0.67 0.26 0.13 0.17 0.41 0.27 0.22 0.37 0.14 0.22
25,000 0.31 0.15 0.24 0.43 0.19 0.08 0.09 0.25 0.19 0.13 0.31 0.15 0.13
26,000 0.18 0.12 0.13 1.18 0.16 0.06 0.05 0.14 0.15 0.26 0.18 0.12 0.26
27,000 0.18 0.08 0.13 0.26 0.11 0.04 0.03 0.21 0.12 0.28 0.18 0.08 0.28
28,000 0.14 0.05 0.08 0.17 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.08 0.12 0.14 0.05 0.12
29,000 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.17 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.13
30,000 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.05
31,000 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.72 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.05
32,000 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.08
33,000 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.06
34,000 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
35,000 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0 0.01 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
36,000 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
37,000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
38,000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
39,000 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
40,000 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0 0 0.04 0.02 0 0 0.01 0 0
41,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% of Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Source: Federal Highway Administration.


H.4.2 7B. TANDEM, 7C. TRIDEM, AND 7D. QUAD AXLE VEHICLES

For tandem axle vehicles, the axle weight group starts at 6,000 lbs. and ends at 82,000, lbs. with increments of 2,000 lbs. For both tridem and quad axle vehicles, the axle weight group start at 12,000 lbs. and ends at 102,000 lbs. with increments of 3,000 lbs.

8. Number of Axle Types per Truck Class

The number of axles per vehicle class for a given axle configuration is an annual average number of axles per vehicle category (per vehicle class and vehicle axle configuration).

TABLE H-7 AVERAGE NUMBER OF AXLES
Single Axle Tandem Tridem Quad
Class 4 1.62 0.39 0
Class 5 2 0 0
Class 6 1.02 0.99 0
Class 7 1 0.26 0.83
Class 8 2.38 0.67 0
Class 9 1.13 1.93 0
Class 10 1.19 1.09 0.89
Class 11 4.29 0.26 0.06
Class 12 3.52 1.14 0.06
Class 13 2.15 2.13 0.35

Source:    Federal Highway Administration

9. Axle Spacing

Axle spacing data are only applicable to tandem, tridem, and quad vehicles in the sense for pavement design concepts discussed here. It is the distance between two consecutive tandem, tridem, and quad axles.

10. Average Axle Width

The distance between the two outside edges of an axle is defined as axle width

11. Wheelbase

The distance between the steering and the first device axle of a tractor or a heavy single unit. This definition is only applicable to the pavement design concept discussed here.

TABLE H-8 TRAFFIC DATA SUMMARY
Date Item # Date Item Name # of Data Points Frequency Foundation Data Data Dimension
1 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic 1 Annually AADTT By sum of all trucks
2 % of Truck Traffic in Design Direction 1 Annually AADTT By sum of all trucks and travel direction
3 % of Truck Traffic in Design Lane 1 Annually AADTT By sum of all trucks, travel direction, and travel lane
4 Truck Monthly Adjustment Factor 120 Monthly MADTT MADTT by truck class for each month in a year
5 Truck Classification 12 Annually AADTT AADTT by truck class
6 Truck Hourly Distribution 24 Annually AADTT AADTT by sum of all trucks by hour of the day
7 Axle Load Factor – Single Axle 4680 Monthly MADTT MADTT by truck class, axle configuration, and axle weight group
Axle Load Factor – Tandem 4680 Monthly MADTT MADTT by truck class, axle configuration, and axle weight group
Axle Load Factor – Tridem 3720 Monthly MADTT MADTT by truck class, axle configuration, and axle weight group
Axle Load factor – Quad 3720 Monthly MADTT MADTT by truck class, axle configuration, and axle weight group
8 Number of Axles 40 Annually AADTT AADTT by truck class and axle configuration
9 Axle Spacing-tandem, tridem, and quad 3 Annually AADTT AADTT by axle configuration
10 Wheelbase 3 Annually AADTT AADTT by wheelbase

Source: Federal Highway Administration.

H.5 SUMMARY

Traffic data is one of the most critical elements in pavement design. Even though all traffic data used in pavement design reflects future traffic conditions, traffic monitoring programs and traffic monitoring data provide the needed ground truth in the projection processes including, but not limited to, establishing historical trend and model calibration and validation.

Page last modified on November 7, 2014
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000