U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-16-053     Date:  October 2016
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-16-053
Date: October 2016

 

Application and Validation of Remaining Service Interval Framework for Pavements

REFERENCES

  1. Elkins, G.E., Thompson, T.M., Groeger, J.L., Visintine, B.A., and Rada, G.R. (2013). Reformulated Pavement Remaining Service Life Framework. Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-038, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  2. GPO. (2012). Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, Pub. L. 112-141, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  3. GPO. (2015). Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, Pub. Law 114-94, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  4. Titus-Glover, L., Fang, C., Alam, M., O’Toole, K., and Darter, M.I. (2010). Pavement Health Track (PHT), Remaining Service Life (RSL) Forecasting Models, Technical Information. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  5. Ullidtz, P., Harvey, J., Basheer, I., Jones, D., Wu, R., Lea, J., and Lu, Q. (2010). “CalME: A New Mechanistic-Empirical Design Program for Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 143–152.

  6. Peters, M. (2008). “State of Good Repair” on the Northeast Corridor. Letter to Congress. Obtained from: https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/details/L04088, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  7. Colorado Department of Transportation. (2013). Pavement Asset Management. Obtained from: https://www.codot.gov/programs/planning/documents/stac-archives/2013-stac/july-2013/drivability-life-presentation, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  8. Colorado Department of Transportation. (2011). How Pavement Management Works for the Layman. Obtained from: http://co-asphalt.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/cdot_docs/Funding/CDOT-PMS-Executive-Summary-09-2011.pdf, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  9. Colorado Department of Transportation. (2012). FY 2012–13 Joint Budget Committee Hearing Agenda. Obtained from https://www.codot.gov/business/budget/legislative-reports-information/previous-legislative-reports-and-information/CDOT%20JBC%20Hearing%
    20responses%201-3-2012.pdf    , last accessed November 4, 2013.

  10. Hedfi, A. and Stephanos, P. (2001). Pavement Performance Modeling: An Applied Approach at the State of Maryland. 5th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Seattle, WA.

  11. Flintsch, G.W. and Bryant, Jr., J.W. (2006). Asset Management Data Collection for Supporting Decision Processes. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  12. Maryland State Highway Administration. (2012). MDSHA Guide to Pavement Preservation. Geotechnical Division of the Office of Materials Technology, Baltimore, MD.

  13. Michigan Department of Transportation. Pavement Management System: Transportation Asset Management. Obtained from: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/pavement_16566_7.pdf, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  14. Federal Highway Administration. (2015). Smoothness. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/smoothness, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  15. Newell, C.B. (2012) Tools and Methods for Monitoring Performance Results. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI.

  16. Federal Highway Administration. (2008). Pavement Management Systems Peer Exchange Program Report. Obtained from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pmspeer/pmspeer.pdf, last accessed November 8, 2013.

  17. Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2013). 2012 Condition Annual Report. MnDOT/OMRR-PM—2013-01. Office of Materials and Road Research, Pavement Management Unit, St. Paul, MN.

  18. North Carolina General Assembly. (2013). Strategic Prioritization Funding Plan for Transportation Investments. North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 136, Article 14B, obtained from: http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_136/Article_14B.pdf, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  19. Bhargava, A. and Laumet, P. (2012). Using Integrated Asset Management System to Perform Corridor-Level Analysis for Planning and Scheduling Bridge and Pavement Projects. Presentation, 9th National Conference on Transportation Asset Management, San Diego, CA. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/assetmgmt/presentations/Tradeoffs-Bhargava-Laumet.pdf, last accessed May 23, 2016.

  20. Virginia Department of Transportation. (2012). State of the Pavement 2012. Maintenance Division, Richmond, VA.

  21. Virginia Department of Transportation. (2010). Needs Based Assessment of Pavements Using Multi-Constraint Optimization. Obtained from: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/pavementevaluation/presentations/Chowdhurry.pdf, last accessed November 6, 2013.

  22. FHWA. (2008). Transportation Asset Management Case Studies: Pavement Management System—The Washington State Experience. Report No. FHWA IF-08-010, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  23. Office of Highway Policy Information. (2008). HPMS Reassessment 2010+: Final Report. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/hpms/2010/hpms2010.pdf, last accessed, May 23, 2016.

  24. NCHRP. (2004). Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP Project 1-37A, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  25. Elkins, G.E., Rada, G.R., Groeger, J.L., and Visintine, B. (2013). Pavement Remaining Service Interval Implementation Guidelines. Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-050, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  26. Battelle/ARA. Guidelines for Implementing the New MEPDG Pavement Equations, Unpublished report submitted to the FHWA in 2009.

  27. Washington State Department of Transportation. (2014). Pavement Asset Management. Pavements Branch, Olympia, WA.

  28. Kay, R.K., Mahoney, J.P., and Jackson, N.C. (1993). The WSDOT Pavement Management System—A 1993 Update. Report No. WA-RD 274.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA.

  29. O’Toole, K., Alam, M., and Titus-Glover, L. (2013) Pavement Health Track (PHT) Analysis Tool. Summary Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  30. Guerre, J., Groeger, J., Van Hecke, S., Simpson, A., Rada, G., and Visintine, B. (2012). Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health—Pilot Study Report. Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-049, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  31. Simpson, A., Rada, G., Visintine, B., and Groeger, J. (2013). Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health Pilot Study Report Addendum—Rutting Bias Investigation. Report No. FHWA-HIF-13-037, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  32. Van Hecke, S., Alam, M., Ebright-McKeehan, K., Visintine, B., and Groeger, J. (2013). Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health: Assessing the Health of Two Corridors Using the Pavement Health Track (PHT) Tool. Draft report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  33. NCHRP. (2013.) Increasing Consistency in the Highway Performance Monitoring System for Pavement Reporting. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  34. Rada, G.R., Visintine, B.A., Simpson, A.L., and Groeger, J.L. (2015). Interstate Pavement Condition Sampling: Phase I Report. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  35. Thyagarajan, S., Sivaneswaran, N., and Petros, K. (2015). “Incorporating Traffic Speed Deflection Devices in Structural Evaluation of Flexible Pavement: Methodologies for Pavement Management Application.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  36. Quintus, H.L.V., Simpson, A.L., Eltahan, A.A. (2006) Rehabilitation of Asphalt Concrete Pavements: Initial Evaluation of the SPS-5 Experiment—Final Report. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-168, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  37. Uzan, J. (undated). JULEA: Jacob Uzan Layered Elastic Analysis, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.

  38. Rada, G.R., Nazarian, S., Visintine, B.A., Siddharthan, R., and Thyagarajan, S. (2015). Pavement Structural Evaluation at the Network Level: Final Report. Report No. FHWA-HRT-15-074, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  39. Benkelman, A.C. and Carey, Jr., W.N. (1962). “Prediction of Flexible Pavement Performance from Deflection Measurements,” Highway Research Record: Journal of the Highway Research Board, 73, pp. 224–226.

  40. Huang, Y.H. (1971). “Deflection and Curvature as Criteria for Flexible Pavement Design and Evaluation.” Highway Research Record: Journal of the Highway Research Board, 345, pp. 1–14.

  41. Gomez-Achecar, M. and Thompson. M.R. (1986). “ILLI-PAVE-Based Response Algorithms for Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Flexible Pavements.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1095, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 11–18.

  42. Fernando, E., Luhr, D., and Anderson, D. (1986) “Development of a Simplified Mechanistic Pavement Evaluation and Overlay Design Procedure for Flexible Pavements.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1095, Washington, DC, pp. 37–44.

  43. Van Gurp, C., Bode, A., Wennink, M., and Molenaar, A. (1998). “Full Structure Diagnosis of Low-Volume Roads.” Eds. R.S. Nordal and G. Refsdal, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, 1, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 517–526.

  44. Xu, B., Ranjithan, S.R., and Kim, Y.R. (2002). “New Relationships between Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflections and Asphalt Pavement Layer Condition Indicators.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1806, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 48–56.

  45. Noureldin, A.S., Zhu, K., Li, S., and Harris, D. (2003). “Network Pavement Evaluation with Falling Weight Deflectometer and Ground-Penetrating Radar.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1860, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 90–99.

  46. Thyagarajan, S., Sivaneswaran, N., Petros, K., and Muhunthan, B. (2011). Development of a Simplified Method for Interpreting Surface Deflections for In-Service Flexible Pavement Evaluation. 8th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Santiago, Chile.

  47. Sathaye, N. and Madanat, S. (2011). “A Bottom-up Solution for the Multi-facility Optimal Pavement Resurfacing Problem.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45, pp. 1004–1017.

  48. Lidicker, J., Sathaye, N., Madanat, S., and Horvath, A. (2013). “Pavement Resurfacing Policy for Minimization of Life-Cycle Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19, pp. 129–137.

  49. Medury, A. and Madanat, S. (2011). “Simultaneous Network Optimization Approach for Pavement Management Systems.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20, pp. 04014010-1–04014010-7.

  50. Reeves, C. (1995). “A Genetic Algorithm for Flowshop Sequencing.” Computers and Operations Research, 22, 5–13.

  51. Surajudeen-Bakinde, N., Zhu, X., Gao, J., and Nandi, A. (2009). “Effects of Fitness Scaling and Adaptive Parameters on Genetic Algorithm based Equalization for DS-UWB Systems.” Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computers and Devices for Communication, Kolkata, India.

  52. Harik, G., Goldberg, D., Cantu-Paz, E., and Miller, B. (1999). “The Gambler’s Ruin Problem, Genetic Algorithms, and the Sizing of Populations.” Evolutionary Computation, 7(3), pp. 231–253

  53. Ryden, N. and Park, C.B. (2006). “Fast Simulated Annealing Inversion of Surface Waves on Pavement Using Phase-Velocity Spectra.” Geophysics, 71(4), pp. R49–R58.

 

 

 

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101