« PreviousNext »
      	3 Impacts to VC Funding Sources & Project Implications
      Impacts to VC funding sources: economic shocks can lead to reduced revenues
      
         
          
            | DRIVER FOR REDUCTION IN VALUE    CAPTURE REVENUE | VALUE CAPTURE TECHNIQUE IMPACTED | 
          
            | Lower property value appreciation | TIF, Joint Development, Special    Assessments | 
          
            | Lower assessments and/or difficulty    levying new assessments | Special Assessments | 
          
            | Less new development leading to lower    impact fees / reduction in fee | Impact fees | 
          
            | Less commerce leading to lower sales    tax district fees | Special Assessment District,    specifically sales tax district | 
          
            | Changing naming rights demand | Naming Rights | 
      
      Lower property value appreciation – varies by shock
        
          
            | Economic Shock | Office | Retail | Industrial | Mult-family | Residential | 
          
            | Great Financial Crisis (GFC) |  |  |  |  |  | 
          
            | COVID-19 Pandemic |  |  |  |  ; |  | 
      
        
        	
 = real estate sector saw depreciation
        
 
        
       	  
 = real estate sector saw appreciation
        
 
      Lower property value appreciation – negatively impacts TIF revenues
        TIF  relies on improved infrastructure assets leading to higher property values; but  economic shocks can negatively affect growth in appraised property value
         
        Conceptual Overview –
        Economic Shock Impacts on TIF
         
          Projected Annual TAD Revenue for Atlanta  BeltLine, 2012-2030
Data Source: Atlanta Beltline “Changes in  Tax Increment Projections”
        There's a line chart here. The Y axis runs from 0 to 350 million dollars. The X axis runs dates from 2012 out to 2030. The Original TAD Projection line starts at rougly 30 million dollars, running from 2012 to 2030. It tops out at roughly 320 million dollars.
         
        
      Lower property value appreciation – can lower special assessment revenues
        
        A graphic with house icons that alternate in  blue and white colors. Each house icon has a percent symbol inside. The title is: 'Special Assessment District with Ad Valorem Levies.
        
        	- Revenue collected based on value of property in special assessment district
- During shock, value of these properties may decline, and associated revenues will too,/
Lower assessments / difficulty  levying new assessments
During  economic shock it may be more difficult to levy new special assessments 
   
 
  Lower levies feasible during periods of  economic shock
 
 
  Property owners may block new levies during economic downturns
Less new development leading to lower impact fees / reduction in fee
 
 
Line chart showing the numbers of New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units. Dates go from 1990 to 2022. It starts in 1990 at about 1,600 units and fluctuates. There's a big dip after 2006 where it was up to 2200, and it goes all the way down to about 500 near 2009. Then it slowly works its way back up until it takes another significant dip after COVID-19 right before the start of 2020. Both the Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19 date ranges are shaded to mark economic recession. Map showing Osceola County, Florida highlighted.
      Source:  US Census Bureau and US Department of Housing and Urban Development 
      Less commerce leading to lower sales tax district fees
 
      There's a area chart here. The Y axis runs from 0 to 800 million dollars. The X axis runs dates from 2013 out to 2020. There are four quarters represented by the areas on the chart. Quarter 1 runs from 0 dollars in 2013 up to 100 million dollars in 2014, rising up to hit roughly 175 million in 2019, then it falls by 2020 back to roughly 135 million. Quarter 2 runs from roughly 108 million dollars in 2013 up to 210 million dollars in 2014, rising up to hit roughly 340 million in 2019, then it falls by 2020 back to roughly 200 million. Quarter 3 runs from roughly 225 million dollars in 2013 up to 400 million dollars in 2015, rising up to hit 510 million in 2019, then it falls by 2020 back to roughly 290 million. Quarter 4 runs from roughly 365 million dollars in 2013 up to 550 million dollars in 2015, rising up to hit 705 million in 2019, then it falls by 2020 back to roughly 370 million.
      Volume  of Taxable Sales in the Kansas City Streetcar’s 
      Starter  Line Transportation Development District
Source:  Missouri Department of Revenue, Taxation Division, Taxable Sales and Use Tax by  Locality – Taxable Sales for All Districts (2013 – 2021).
Implications of reduced VC revenues on projects
  
  
    | Implication | For example… | 
  
    | Inability    to Meet Funding or Debt Service Requirements of Current Projects  | Atlanta    BeltLine’s less than expected TIF revenues during GFC hindered projectAssessed    value of NYC office buildings declined by 16.6% in 2021
 | 
  
    | Reduced    Ability to Secure Project Financing  | 
        With    reduced TIF revenues during GFC, Atlanta BeltLine did not have enough debt    capacity to issue more bonds | 
  
    | Reduced    Public Agency Willingness to Fund Future Projects  | 
        Projects    with unidentified funding sources or with less support will fail to get off    the ground during economic shocks  | 
  
    | Switch  to Pay-As-You-Go (Paygo) Modality  | 
        May    lead to project phasing as in Atlanta BeltLine or Colorado E-470 | 
 
      « PreviousNext »