U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-12-048    Date:  November 2013
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-12-048
Date: November 2013

 

Pavement Marking Demonstration Projects: State of Alaska and State of Tennessee

REFERENCES

  1. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). (2005). Public Law No. 109-59 Section 1907, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  2. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. (2007). Pocket Guide to Transportation 2007, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.bts.gov/publications/pocket_guide_to_transportation/2007/. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.

  3. Federal Highway Administration. (2003). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

  4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2008). New AASHTO Study Designed to Save Lives, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://news.transportation.org/press_release.aspx?Action=ViewNews&NewsID=170. Site last accessed September 4, 2009.

  5. Federal Highway Administration. Roadway Departure Safety, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  6. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Implementing the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://safety.transportation.org/. Site last accessed September 4, 2009.

  7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Driving Down Lane Departure Crashes-A National Priority, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://news. transportation.org/press_release.aspx?Action=ViewNews&NewsID=170. Site last accessed September 4, 2009.

  8. Falk, K.W. and Carlson, P.J. (2008). Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Workshop: Summary Report, Report No. FHWA-SA-08-003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  9. Carlson, P.J., Park, E.S., and Andersen, C.K. (2009). "The Benefits of Pavement Markings: A Renewed Perspective Based on Recent and Ongoing Research," TRB DVD Compendium of Papers, TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  10. National Association of County Engineers Resource Training and Education. Local Road and Bridge Facts. Obtained from: http://www.naco.org/NACETemplate.cfm?Section= Resources,_Training_and_Education&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm &ContentID=8007. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.

  11. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. (2004). Table 1-4: Public Road and Street Mileage by Type of Surface. Obtained from: http://www.bts.gov/publications/ national_transportation_statistics/2004/html/table_01_04.html. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.

  12. ASTM D713-90. (2010). "Standard Practice for Conducting Road Service Tests on Fluid Traffic Marking Materials," Book of Standards Volume 06.02, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  13. National Transportation Product Evaluation Program. (2004). Project Workplan for the Field Evaluation of Pavement Marking Materials, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  14. National Transportation Product Evaluation Program. NTPEP Best Practices Manual, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  15. Connor, B. and Bennett, J. (2001). Selection of Pavement Marking Materials Research & Technology Transfer, Alaska Department of Transportation, Juneau, AK.

  16. Kaseko, M., Vasudevan, V., and Merrill, J. (2004). Evaluation of Performance of Pavement Markings for Clark County Roads: Quarterly Report, Transportation Research Center, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.

  17. Kaseko, M.S., Vodrazka, W.C., and Nambisan, S.S. (2001). Comparative Evaluation of Field Performance of Pavement Marking Products on Alternative Test Deck Designs, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  18. Lee, J., Maleck, T., and Taylor, W. (1999). "Pavement Marking Material Evaluation Study in Michigan," Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, 69(7), 44-51.

  19. Lindly, J. and Wijesundera, R. (2003). Evaluation of Profiled Pavement Markings, UTCA Report 01465, University Transportation Center for Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.

  20. Hawkins, N., Smadi, O., Hans, Z., and Maze, T. (2006). "Integrated Approach to Pavement Marking Management," Transportation Research Record 1948, 99-100, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  21. Vosburgh, J. (2005). Pavement Marking Durability, Presentation for Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, VT.

  22. Kopf, J. (2004). Reflectivity of Pavement Markings: Analysis of Retroreflectivity Degradation Curves, Research Project T1803, Task 20, Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

  23. Martin, P., Perrin, J., Jitprasithsiri, S., and Hansen, B. (1996). A Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Pavement Marking Materials for the State of Utah, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

  24. Lagergren, E., Bertsch, J., and Fernald, D. (2006). I-90 Pavement Marking Material Test, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  25. Lundkvist, S. and Astrom, S. (2000). The Performance of Wet Visibility Road Markings- Final Report on Provvag 1998-2000, Report 465A, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden.

  26. Migletz, J., Graham, J.L., Harwood, D.W., Bauer, K.M., and Sterner, P.L. (2000). Evaluation of All-Weather Pavement Markings, Report C1038/3524-04, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  27. ASTM D6359-99. (1999). "Standard Specification for Minimum Retroreflectance of Newly Applied Pavement Marking Using Portable Hand-Operated Instruments," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  28. ASTM E1710-05. (2005). "Standard Test Method for Measurement of Retroreflective Pavement Marking Materials with CEN-Prescribed Geometry Using a Portable Retroreflectometer," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  29. ASTM D913-10. (2010). "Standard Practice for Evaluating Degree of Traffic Paint Line Wear," Book of Standards Volume 06.02, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  30. ASTM D6628-03. (2010). "Standard Specification for Color of Pavement Marking Materials," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  31. Gates, T.J. and Hawkins, H.G. (2002). The Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings, Report No. 0024-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.

  32. Hawkins, N., Smadi, O., Hans, Z., and Resler, J. (2007). To Groove or Not to Groove, That is the Question, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  33. AASHTO M247-09. (2009). Standard Specifications for Glass Beads Used for Pavement Markings, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  34. Center for Transportation Research and Education. Pavement Marking Selection Tool, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Obtained from: http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/PMST/. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  35. Cirillo, J.A. (1968). "Interstate System Crash Research; Study II, Interim Report II," Public Roads, 35(3), 71-76.

  36. Solomon, D. (1964). Crashes on Main Rural Highways Related to Speed, Driver and Vehicle, Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

  37. Van Driel, C.J.G., Davidse, R.J., and van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M. (2004). "The Effects of an Edge Line on Speed and Lateral Position: A Meta-Analysis," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(4), 671-682.

  38. Sun, X. and Tekell, V.O. (2005). Impact of Edge Lines on Safety of Rural Two-Lane Highways, LTRC Report 414, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA.

  39. Donnell, E.T., Lee, D., Molino, J., and Opiela, K.S. (2007). Can Pavement Marking Curve Delineation Improve the Consistency of Vehicle Speed and Lane Position? Results from a Nighttime Driving Experiment, Paper No. 07-0943, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  40. Tsyganov, A.R., Machemehl, R.B., Warrenchuk, N.M., and Wany, Y. (2006). Before-AfterComparison of Edge Line Effects on Rural Two-Lane Highways, CTR Technical Report 0-5090-2, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.

  41. Taylor, J.L., McGee, H.W., Sequin, E.L., and Hostetter, R.S. (1972). NCHRP Report 130: Roadway Delineation Systems, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  42. Stimpson, W.A., McGee, H.W., Kittelson, W.K., and Ruddy, R.H. (1977). Field Evaluation of Selected Delineation Treatments on Two-Lane Rural Highways, Publication No. FHWA- RD-77-118, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  43. Cottrell, B.H. (1986). "The Effects of Wide Edge Lines on Lateral Placement and Speed on Two-Lane Rural Roads," Transportation Research Record 1069, 1-6, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  44. Nedas, N.D., Balcar, G.P., and Macy, P.R. (1982). "Road Markings as an Alcohol Countermeasure for Highway Safety: Field Study of Standard and Wide Edgelines," Transportation Research Record 847, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  45. Thomas, I.L. and Taylor, W.T. (1960). "Effect of Edge Striping on Traffic Operations," Highway Research Board Bulletin 244, 11-15, Washington, DC.

  46. Wheeler, R.E. (1974). "Portable Power," Technometrics, 16, 193-201.

  47. Nelson, L.S. (1985). "Sample Size Tables for Analysis of Variance," Journal of Quality Technology, 17, 167-169.

  48. Bratcher, T.L., Moran, M.A., and Zimmer, W.J. (1990). "Tables of Sample Sizes in the Analysis of Variances," Journal of Quality Technology, 2, 156-164.

  49. Krammes, R.A., Tyer, K.D., Middleton, D.R., and Feldman, S.A. (1990). An Alternative to Post-Mounted Delineators at Horizontal Curves on Two-Lane Highways, Report No. 1145-1F, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

  50. Dudek, C.L., Huchingson, R.D., Creasey, F.T., and Pendleton, O. (1988). "Field Studies of Temporary Pavement Markings at Overlay Project Work Zones on Two-Lane, Two-Way Rural Highways," Transportation Research Record 1160, 22-34, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  51. Hall, J.W. (1987). "Evaluation of Wide Edge Lines," Transportation Research Record 1114, 21-27, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  52. Cottrell, B.H. (1987). Evaluation of Wide Edge Lines on Two-Lane Rural Roads, Publication No. FHWA-VA-85-37, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.

  53. Hughes, W.E., McGee, H.W., Hussain, S., and Keegel, J. (1989). Field Evaluation of Edgeline Widths, Report No. FHWA-RD-89-111, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  54. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. HSIS-Highway Safety Information System, McLean, VA. Obtained from: http://www.hsisinfo.org. Site last accessed June 7, 2013.

  55. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Safety Manual, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.highwaysafetymanual.org/Pages/default.aspx. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  56. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. SafetyAnalyst, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.safetyanalyst.org/index.htm. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  57. Google Earth®. (2006). US 50/K25 Junction to Lakin City Limit (Map). Generated by Paul Carlson via Google Earth® on July 15, 2006.

  58. Bahar, G., Mollett, C., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Smiley, A., Smahel, T., and McGee, H. (2004). Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers, NCHRP Report 518, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  59. Campbell, D.T. and Ross, H.L. (1968). "The Connecticut Crackdown on Speeding: Time- Series Data in Quasi-Experimental Analysis," Law and Society Review, 3, 33-54.

  60. Gillings, D., Makuc, D., and Siegel, E. (1981). "Analysis of Interrupted Time Series Mortality Trends: An Example to Evaluate Regionalized Perinatal Care," American Journal of Public Health, 71, 38-46.

  61. Wagner, A.K., Soumerai, S.B., Zhang, F., and Ross-Degnan, D. (2002). "Segmented Regression Analysis of Interrupted Time Series Studies in Medication Use Research," Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 27, 299-309.

  62. Friedman, L.S., Hedeker, D., and Richter, E.D. (2009). "Long-Term Effects of Repealing the National Maximum Speed Limit in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1626-1631.

  63. Grundy, C., Steinbach, R., Edwards, P., Green, J., Armstrong, B., and Wilkinson, P. (2009). "Effects of 20 mph Traffic Speed Zones on Road Injuries in London, 1986-2006: Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis," BMJ, 339, b4469.

  64. Milton, J., Shankar, V., and Mannering, F. (2008). "Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(1), 260-266.

  65. Bonneson, J. and Lord, D. (2006). "Theory, Explanation, and Prediction in Road Safety," Presented at the Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  66. Savolainen, P.T., Mannering, F.L., Lord, D., and Quddus, M.A. (2011). "The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-Injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives," Accident and Analysis Prevention, 43, 1666-1667.

  67. McFadden, D., Train, K., and Tye, W. (1977). "An Application of Diagnostic Tests for the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Property of the Multinomial Logit Model," Transportation Research Record 637, 39-46, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  68. Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. (1984). "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model," Econometrica, 52(5), 1219-1240.

  69. Texas Department of Transportation. (2004). Pavement Marking Handbook, Austin, TX. Obtained from: http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/pmh/pmh.pdf. Site last accessed December 14, 2009.

  70. Virginia Department of Transportation. Pavement Marking Certification Study Guide, Richmond, VA. Obtained from: http://www.virginiadot.org/business/matschools.asp. Site last accessed December 14, 2009.

  71. Federal Highway Administration. Standard Specification for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects, Washington, DC. Obtained from: https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/pse/specs/. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  72. Jahan, K., Axe, L.B., Sandhu, N.K., Ndiba, P.K., Ramanujachary, K.V., and Magdaleno, T.F. (2010). Heavy Metal Contamination in Highway Marking Glass Beads, Report No. FHWA-NJ-2010-014, New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rowan University for the New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, NJ.

  73. Boulanger, B., Raut Desai, A., and Carlson, P. (2011). Heavy Metal Content and Leaching Potential of Recycled Glass Beads Used in Pavement Markings, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.

  74. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Method 6020A, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/6020a.pdf. Site last accessed April 4, 2011.

  75.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). Method 3050B, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3050b.pdf. Site last accessed April 4, 2011.

  76. 23 CFR 771. Environmental Impact and Related Procedures, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=50d1ecb1d4ff8b70f997ec0658c9d8cc;rgn= div5;view=text;node=23%3A1.0.1.8.43;idno=23;cc=ecfr. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  77. 40 CFR 261.20-24. Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste, "Characteristics of Hazardous Wastes," Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=71c270ae90a07a46072e92d367c093c3&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40cfr261_main_02.tpl. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  78. 40 CFR 51. Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=71c270ae90a07a46072e92d367c093c3&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40cfr51_main_02.tpl. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  79. NESHAP. (2008). "Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations-Area Sources," Federal Register, 73(6), 1738-1768.

  80. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A) Interim Final, EPA/540/1-89/002, Washington, DC.

  81. Alaska Department of Transportation. (2005). Alaska Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Guide, Juneau, AK. Obtained from: http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwddes/desenviron/assets/pdf/swppp/english/eng_guide_all.pdf. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  82. California Department of Transportation. (2003). Statewide Storm Water Management Plan, Report No. CTSW-RT-02-008, Sacramento, CA. Obtained from: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/stormwater/pdf/swmp_may2003final.pdf. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  83. Tennessee Department of Transportation. Statewide Storm Water Management Plan, Nashville, TN. Obtained from: http://www.tdot.state.tn.us/sswmp. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  84. Texas Department of Transportation. Storm Water Management Guidelines for Construction Activities, Austin, TX. Obtained from: http://www.txdot.gov/txdot_library/consultants_contractors/publications/environmental_resources.htm#storm.Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  85. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT Metro District's MS4 Stormwater Program, St. Paul, MN. Obtained from: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/waterresources/. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  86. Ohio Department of Transportation. Storm Water Management Program, Columbus, OH. Obtained from: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/stormwater/Pages/default.aspx. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  87. Virginia Department of Transportation. (2004). VDOT Manual of Practice for Stormwater Management, Richmond, VA. Obtained from: http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/05-cr5.pdf. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  88. New York State Department of Transportation. Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Transportation and the Department of Environmental Conservation Regarding the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity, GP-02-01, Albany, NY. Obtained from: https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/engineering/environmental-analysis/repository/spdes_mou_2003.pdf. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  89. Colorado Department of Transportation. Storm Water Program, Denver, CO. Obtained from: http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water-quality/stormwater-programs.html. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  90. Colorado Department of Transportation. Water Quality Program: Illicit Discharges Program, Denver, CO. Obtained from: http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/illicit-discharge-program/cdot-idde-factsheet_1-21-08.pdf/at_download/file. Site last accessed February 8, 2010.

  91. 49 CFR 171-180. Hazardous Materials Regulations, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title49/49cfrv2_02.tpl. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  92. 29 CFR 1910. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title29/29cfr1910_main_02.tpl. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  93. American National Standards Institute. (2004). Standard Z400.1: Hazardous Industrial Chemicals-Material Safety Data Sheets-Preparation, Washington, DC.

  94. 29 CFR 1926.62. Safety and Health Regulations for Construction, "Lead," Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=94eea052f38cae101046e869dcbfe269&rgn=div8&view=text&node=29:8.1.1.1.1.4.13.13&idno=29. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  95. 29 CFR 1926.55. Safety and Health Regulations for Construction, "Gases, Vapors, Fumes, Dusts, and Mists," Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr%3Bsid%3D94eea052f38cae101046e869dcbfe269%3Brgn%3Ddiv5%3Bview%3Dtext%3Bnode%3D29%3A8.1.1.1.1%3Bidno%3D29%3Bcc%3Decfr&29%3A8.1.1.1.1.4.13.6

  96. International Organizataion for Standardization. (2010). ISO 14040:2006: Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, Geneva, Switzerland.

  97. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 14044:2006: Environmental Management-Life-Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines, Geneva, Switzerland.

  98. Scientific Applications International Corporation. (2006). Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, McLean, VA.

  99. Institute for Environment and Sustainability. (2010). ILCD Handbook, International Reference Life Cycle Data System, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy. Obtained from: http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf-directory/ILCD-Handbook-LCIA-Background-analysis-online-12March2010.pdf. Site last accessed June 7, 2013.

  100. Debaillon, C., Carlson, P., He, Y., Schnell, T., and Aktan, F. (2007). Updates to Research on Recommended Minimum Levels for Pavement Markings Retroreflectivity to Meet Driver Night Visibility Needs, Report No. FHWA-HRT-07-059, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  101. Alabama Department of Transportation. (2010). Acceptance Sampling and Testing Schedule, Birmingham, AL. Obtained from: https://www.dot.state.al.us/mtweb/Testing/testing_manual/doc/AST/AST701Rev51110.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  102. Florida Department of Transportation. (2010). Standard Specifications for Road Construction, Tallahassee, FL. Obtained from: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/2010Master.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  103. North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2012). Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, Raleigh, NC. Obtained from: https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/safety/Signing%20and%20Delineation%20Library/Roadway%20Standard%20Specifications%20Division%2012%20-%20Pavement%20Markings%2C%20Markers%20and%20Delineation.pdf Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  104. Kansas Department of Transportation. (2007). 806-Durable Pavement Marking, Topeka, KS. Obtained from: http://www.ksdot.org/burConsMain/specprov/pdf/806.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  105. Kansas Department of Transportation. (2007). 807-Painted Pavement Marking, Topeka, KS. Obtained from: http://www.ksdot.org/burConsMain/specprov/pdf/807.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  106. Delaware Department of Transportation. (2009). "Section C748-Pavement Markings," Division C700-Miscellaneous Construction, Dover, DE. Obtained from: http://www.deldot.gov/information/pubs_forms/manuals/mat_research/pdfs/part_c/c700.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  107. Georgia Department of Transportation. (2012). Section 652-Painting Traffic Stripe, Atlanta, GA. Obtained from: http://www.dot.ga.gov/informationcenter/publicinformation/gptq/documents/specs/section652.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  108. Georgia Department of Transportation. (2012). Section 653-Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe, Atlanta, GA. Obtained from: http://www.dot.ga.gov/doingbusiness/TheSource/special_ provisions/shelf/sp653.pdf Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  109. Colorado Department of Transportation. (2013). Revision of Sections 627 and 708- Pavement Marking Paint, Denver, CO. Obtained from: http://www.coloradodot.info/business/designsupport/construction-specifications/2011-Specs/standard-special-provisions/section-600-revisions/627pmwbvoc.docx/view. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  110. Texas Department of Transportation. (1999). Test Procedure for Determining Functional Characteristics of Pavement Markings, Designation Tex-828-B, Austin, TX. Obtained from: ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cst/TMS/800-B_series/pdfs/ctm828.pdf. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  111. Kansas Department of Transportation. (2007). Special Provision to the Standard Specification Division 806 Durable Pavement Markings, Topeka, KS.

  112. Maryland State Highway Administration. (2012). "Special Provision to Section 572 Pavement Markings," Traffic Control Device Design Manual, Annapolis, MD. Obtained from: http://roads.maryland.gov/oots/part2.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  113. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. (2013). Section 646-Pavement Markings, Madison, WI. Obtained from: http://roadwaystandards.dot.wi.gov/standards/stndspec/ss-06-46.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  114. Florida Department of Transportation. (2010). Maintenance Rating Program Handbook, Tallahassee, FL.

  115. North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2007). RFP Element 40682, Raleigh, NC. Obtained from: https://connect.ncdot.gov/letting/Design%20Build%20Program/Interstate%20Maintenance/FinalRFP.pdf.Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  116. Heltzel, E.R. (2011). Turnkey Asset Maintenance Services Contract, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA. Obtained from: http://www.amotia.org/2011-%20presentations/2%20VDOT%20Turnkey%20Asset%20Maint%20Svcs_Emmet%20Heltzel.pdf. Site last accessed May 11, 2013.

  117. Virginia Department of Transportation. (2007). Road and Bridge Specifications, Richmond, VA. Obtained from: http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/const/2007SpecBoook.pdf Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  118. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2010). Pavement Marking Warranty Specifications, Project 39-13, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_408.pdf. Site last accessed August 24, 2012.

  119. Google Earth®. (2005). Glenn Highway in Anchorage, AK. (Map). Generated by Paul Carlson via Google Earth® on July 15, 2006.

  120. Google Maps®. (2006). SR 840 in Nashville, TN. (Map). Generated by Paul Carlson via Google Maps® online on July 15, 2006. (https://maps.google.com/)

  121. Google Maps®. (2006). SR 34 in Tusculum, TN. (Map). Generated by Paul Carlson via Google Maps® online on July 15, 2006. (https://maps.google.com/)

  122. Shankar, V. and Mannering, F. (1996). "An Exploratory Multinomial Logit Analysis of Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Accident Severity," Journal of Safety Research, 27(3), 183-194.

  123. Savolainen, P. and Mannering, F. (2007). "Probabilistic Models of Motorcyclists' Injury Severities in Single- and Multi-Vehicle Crashes," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(5), 955-963.

  124. Ulfarsson, G. and Mannering, F. (2004). "Differences in Male and Female Injury Severities in Sport-Utility Vehicle, Minivan, Pickup and Passenger Car Accidents," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(2), 135-147.

  125. Khorashadi, A., Niemeier, D., Shankar, V., and Mannering, F. (2005). "Differences in Rural and Urban Driver-Injury Severities in Accidents Involving Large-Trucks: An Exploratory Analysis," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(5), 910-921.

  126. Shankar, V., Mannering, F., and Barfield, W. (1996). "Statistical Analysis of Accident Severity on Rural Freeways," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28(3), 391-401.

  127. Chang, L. and Mannering, F. (1999). "Analysis of Injury Severity and Vehicle Occupancy in Truck- and Non-Truck-Involved Accidents," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31(5), 579-592.

  128. Holdridge, J., Shankar, V., and Ulfarsson, G. (2005). "The Crash Severity Impacts of Fixed Roadside Objects," Journal of Safety Research, 36(2), 139-147.

  129. Wang, X. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2008). "Analysis of Left-Turn Crash Injury Severity by Conflicting Pattern Using Partial Proportional Odds Models," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(5), 1674-1682.

  130. Duncan, C., Khattak, A., and Council, F. (1998). "Applying the Ordered Probit Model to Injury Severity in Truck-Passenger Car Rear-End Collisions," Transportation Research Record 1635, 63-71, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  131. Klop, J. and Khattak, A. (1999). "Factors Influencing Bicycle Crash Severity on Two-Lane, Undivided Roadways in North Carolina," Transportation Research Record 1674, 78-85, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  132. Quddus, M., Noland, R., and Chin, H. (2002). "An Analysis of Motorcycle Injury and Vehicle Damage Severity Using Ordered Probit Models," Journal of Safety Research, 33(4), 445-462.

  133. Kockelman, K. and Kweon, Y. (2002). "Driver Injury Severity: An Application of Ordered Probit Models," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(3), 313-321.

  134. Abdel-Aty, M. (2003). "Analysis of Driver Injury Severity Levels at Multiple Locations Using Ordered Probit Models," Journal of Safety Research, 34(5), 597-603.

  135. O'Donnell, C.J. and Connor, D.H. (1996). "Predicting The Severity of Motor Vehicle Accident Injuries Using Models of Ordered Multiple Choice," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28(6), 739-753.

  136. Gkritza, K. and Mannering, F. (2008). "Mixed Logit Analysis of Safety-Belt Use in Single- and Multi-Occupant Vehicles," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 443-451.

  137. Milton, J., Shankar, V., and Mannering, F. (2008). "Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(1), 260-266.

  138. Pai, C., Hwang, K., and Saleh, W. (2009). "A Mixed Logit Analysis of Motorists' Right-Of- Way Violation in Motorcycle Accidents at Priority T-Junctions," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(3), 565-573.

  139. Kim, J., Ulfarsson, G., Shankar, V., and Mannering, F. (2010). "A Note on Modeling Pedestrian-Injury Severity in Motor-Vehicle Crashes With the Mixed Logit Model," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1751 -1758.

  140. Eluru, N., Bhat, C., and Hensher, D. (2008). "A Mixed Generalized Ordered Response Model for Examining Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injury Severity Level in Traffic Crashes," Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(3), 1033-1054.

 

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101