U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA- HRT-17-095    Date:  September 2017
Publication Number: FHWA- HRT-17-095
Date: September 2017

 

Pavement Performance Measures and Forecasting and The Effects of Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy on Treatment Effectiveness (Revised)

REFERENCES

  1. Federal Highway Administration. (2016) Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTTP) Data Analysis Program—Expanded Strategic Plan. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/programs/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/analysisplan/index5.cfm. Last accessed January 2013.

  2. Baladi, G.Y., Haider, S.W., Chatti, K., Galehouse, L., Dawson, T.A., Dean, C.M., Muscott, R., Tecca, N., and McClosky, M. (2009) Optimization of and Maximizing the Benefits from Pavement Management Data Collection: Interim Report 1. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  3. Dawson, T.A. (2012) Evaluation of Pavement Management Data and Analysis of Treatment Effectiveness Using Multi-Level Treatment Transition Matrices. Doctoral Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

  4. Baladi, G.Y., Snyder, M., and McKelvey, F. (1992) Highway Pavements. Volumes I, II, and III. National Highway Institute, Washington, DC.

  5. Dawson, T.A., Baladi, G.Y., Dean, C.M., Haider, S.W., and Chatti, K. (2011) Defining Benefits from Pavement Rehabilitation and Preservation. American Society of Civil Engineers Conference: Integrated Transportation and Development for a Better Tomorrow, Chicago, IL.

  6. Khattak, J.M. and Baladi, G.Y. (2007) Deduct Points and Distress Indices. University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA.

  7. Baladi, G.Y., Buch, N., and Van Dam, T. (1999) Michigan Pavement Preservation Manual. Michigan Department of Transportation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

  8. Khazanovich L., Darter, M., Barlett, R., and McPeak, T. (1998) Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing PCC Pavements. Report No. FHWA-RD-97-131, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  9. Guerre, J., Groeger, J., Hecke, S.V., Simpson, A., Rada, G., and Visintine, B. (2011) Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health, Phase 1 Results. Final Report. Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-049, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.

  10. Rauhut, J.B., Eltahan, A., and Simpson, A.L. (1999) Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing AC Pavements. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-193, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  11. Guerre, J., Groeger, J., Hecke, S.V., Simpson, A., Rada, G., and Visintine, B. (2012) Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health. Pilot Study Report. Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-049, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  12. Chatti, K., Buch, N., Haider, S.W., Pulipaka, A.S., Lyles, R.W., Gilliland, D., and Desaraju, P. (2005) LTPP Data Analysis: Influence of Design and Construction Features on the Response and Performance of New Flexible and Rigid Pavements. Web-Only Document 74 (Project 2050 [10/16]), National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  13. Ahmed, K., Abu-Lebdeh, G., and Lyles, R.W. (2006) “Prediction of Pavement Distress Index With Limited Data on Causal Factors: an Auto-Regression Approach,” The International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7(1), p. 23–35, London, England.

  14. Irfan, M., Khurshid, M.B., and Labi, S. (2009) Service Life of Thin HMA Overlay Using Different Performance Indicators. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  15. Luo, Z. (2006) Flexible Pavement Condition Model Using Cluster-wise Regression and Mechanistic-Empirical Procedure for Fatigue Cracking Modeling. Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

  16. Geoffrey, D.N. (1996) “Cost-Effective Preventive Pavement Maintenance,” Synthesis of Highway Practice 223. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  17. Hicks, G.R., Seeds, S.B., and Peshkin, D.G. (2000) Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements. Report No. FHWA-IF-00-027. Foundation for Pavement Preservation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  18. Johnson, A.M. (2000) Best Practices Handbook on Asphalt Pavement Maintenance. Report No. 200004, Center for Transportation Studies (CTS), Minnesota T2/LTAP Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

  19. Ohio Department of Transportation. (2001) Pavement Preventive Maintenance Program Guidelines. Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Pavement Engineering Report, Columbus, OH.

  20. Wade, M., DeSombre, R.I., and Peshkin, D.G. (2001) High Volume/High Speed Asphalt Roadway Preventive Maintenance Surface Treatments. Report No. SD9909, South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, SD.

  21. Michigan Department of Transportation. (2001) Effectiveness of the Capital Preventive Maintenance Program. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI.

  22. Peshkin, D.G., Hoerner, T.E., and Zimmerman, K.A. (2004) Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications. Report 523. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  23. Federal Highway Administration. (2010) Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments. Report No. FHWA-HIF-10-020, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  24. Bolander, P.W. (2005) “Seal Coat Options: Taking Out the Mystery,” Transportation Research Circular No. EC078: Roadway Pavement Preservation 2005: Papers from the First National Conference on Pavement Preservation, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  25. Gransberg, D. and James, D.M.B. (2005) “Chip Seal Best Practice,” Synthesis of Highway Practice 342. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  26. Maher, M., Marshall, C., Harrison, F., and Baumgaertner, K. (2005) Context Sensitive Roadway Surfacing Selection Guide. Publication No. FHWA-CFL/TD-05-004a., Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  27. Morian, D.A., Oswalt, J., and Deodhar, A. (2004) “Experience With Cold In-Place Recycling as a Reflective Crack Control Technique: Twenty Years Later,” Transportation Research Record 1869, p. 47–55, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  28. Smith, R.E. and Beatty, C.K. (1999) “Microsurfacing Usage Guidelines,” Transportation Research Record 1680, p. 13–17, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  29. Labi, S., Hwee, M.S., Lamptey G., and Nunoo, C. (2006) Long-Term Benefits of Microsurfacing Applications in Indiana—Methodology and Case Study. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  30. Spath, H. (1979) “Clusterwise Linear Regression,” Computing 22(4), p. 376–373, New York, NY.

  31. Spath, H. (1981) “Correction to Algorithm 39: Clusterwise Linear Regression,” Computing 26, p. 275–275, New York, NY.

  32. Spath, H. (1982) “Algorithm 48: A Fast Algorithm for Clusterwise Linear Regression,” Computing, 29, p. 187–189, New York, NY.

  33. Meier, J. (1987) “A Fast Algorithm for Clusterwise Linear Absolute Deviations Regression,” OR Spectrum 9(3), p. 187–189, Woodstock, GA.

  34. DeSarbo, W.S., Oliver, R.L., and Rangaswamy, A. (1989) “A Simulated Annealing Methodology for Clusterwise Linear Regression,” Psychometrika 54(4), p. 707–736, Greensboro, NC.

  35. Lau, K.N., Leung, P.L., and Tse, K.K. (1999) “A Mathematical Programming Approach to Clusterwise Regression Model and its Extensions,” European Journal of Operational Research 116(3), 1 p. 640–652, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  36. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1993) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  37. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004) “Chapter 6: HMA Rehabilitation of Existing Pavements,” Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Part 3. NCHRP Project 137A Final Report. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  38. Labi, S. and Sinha, K.C. (2003) The Effectiveness of Maintenance and Its Impact on Capital Expenditures, Joint Transportation Research Program, West Lafayette, IN.

  39. Morgado, J. and Neves, J. (2008) Accounting for User Costs When Planning Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Activities. Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

  40. Reigle, J. and Zaniewski, J. (2002) “Risk-Based Life-Cycle Analysis for Project-Level Pavement Management,” Transportation Research Record 1816, p. 34–42, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  41. Khurshid, M.B., Irfan, M., and Labi, S. (2008) Comparing the Methods for Evaluating Pavement Interventions—A Discussion and Case Study. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  42. Mouaket, I.M. and Sinha, K.C. (1991) Cost Effectiveness of Routine Maintenance on Rigid Pavements. Report FHWA/JHRP-9111. Federal Highway Administration, Joint Highway Research Project, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

  43. Lamptey, G., Ahmad, M., Labi, S., and Sinha, K.C. (2004) Life Cycle Cost Analysis for INDOT Pavement Design Procedures. Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/28. Federal Highway Administration, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

  44. Fazil, T.N. and Parades, V. (2001) “Cost-Benefit Highway Pavement Maintenance,” Transportation Research Record 1749, p. 22–27, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.

  45. Baladi, G.Y., Dawson, T.A., Dean, C.M., Haider, S.W., Chatti, K., and Galehouse, L. (2011) Optimization of and Maximizing the Benefits From Pavement Management Data Collection: Thirteenth Quarterly Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  46. Chien, S., Tang, Y., and Schonfeld, P. (2002) “Optimizing Work Zones for Two Lane Highway Maintenance Projects,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(2), p. 145–155, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  47. Lewis, D.L. (1999) “Road User and Mitigation Costs in Highway Pavement Projects,” Synthesis of Highway Practice 269. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  48. Daniels, G., Stockton, W.R., and Hundley, R. (2000) “Estimating Road User Costs Associated with Highway Construction Projects,” Transportation Research Record 1732, p.70–79, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  49. Berthelot, C.F., Sparks, G.A., Blomme, T., Kajner, L., and Nickeson, M. (1996) “Mechanistic-Probabilistic Vehicle Operating Cost Model,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122(5), p. 337–341. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  50. Walls, J. and Smith, M.R. (1998) Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design—Interim Technical Bulletin. Publication No. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  51. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011) Consumer Price Index. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cpi/. Last accessed August 1, 2015.

  52. Geiger, D.R. (2005) ACTION: Pavement Preservation Definitions. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available at www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/091205.cfm. Last accessed August 1, 2015.

  53. Federal Highway Administration. (2000) “Optimizing Highway Performance: Pavement Preservation,” Construction and Maintenance Fact Sheets. Publication No. FHWA-IF-00-013. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/t2/fs00013.cfm. Last accessed August 1, 2015.

  54. Baladi, G.Y., Svasdisant, T., Van Dam, T., Buch, N., and Chatti, K. (2002) “Cost-Effective Preventive Maintenance: Case Studies,” Transportation Research Record 1795, p. 17–26, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  55. Adams, T.M. and Kang, M. (2006) Considerations for Establishing a Pavement Preservation Program. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  56. Delaware Department of Transportation. (2001) Pavement Management: A Guide for Local Officials. Delaware Department of Transportation, Pavement Preservation 2, Foundation for Pavement Preservation, Salina, KS.

  57. Al-Mansour, A.I. and Sinha, K.C. (1994) “Economic Analysis of Effectiveness of Pavement Preventive Maintenance,” Transportation Research Record 1442, p. 31–37, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.

  58. Labi, S. and Sinha, K.C. (2004) “Effectiveness of Highway Pavement Seal Coating Treatments,” Journal of Transportation Engineering 130(1), p. 14–23, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  59. Elkins, G.E., Thompson, T., Simpson, A., and Ostrom, B. (2012) Long-Term Pavement Performance Information Management System Pavement Performance Database User Reference Guide. Report No. FHWA-RD-03088, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  60. Hall, K.T., Correa, C.E., and Simpson, A.L. (2002) LTPP Data Analysis: Effectiveness of Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Options. Web-Only Document 74 (Project 2050 [10/16]), National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  61. Morian, D.A., Epps, J.A., and Gibson, S.D. (1997) Pavement Treatment Effectiveness, 1995 SPS-3 and SPS-4 Site Evaluations, National Reports. Report No. FHWA-RD-96-208, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  62. Morian, D.A., Gibson, S.D., and Epps, J.A. (1998) Maintaining Flexible Pavements—The Long-Term Pavement Performance Experiment SPS-3: 5-Year Data Analysis. Report No. FHWA-RD-97-102, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  63. Carvalho, R., Ayres, M., Shirazi, H., Selezneva, O., and Darter M. (2011) Impact of Design Features on Pavement Response and Performance in Rehabilitated Flexible and Rigid Pavements. Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-066, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  64. Rauhut, J.B., Von Quintus, H.L., and Eltahan, A. (2000) Performance of Rehabilitated Asphalt Concrete Pavements in LTPP Experiments—Data Collected Through February 1997. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-029, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  65. Von Quintus, H.L., Simpson, A.L., and Elatahan, A.A. (2006) Rehabilitation of Asphalt Concrete Pavements: Initial Evaluation of the SPS-5 Experiment—Final Report. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-168, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  66. Ambroz, J.K. and Darter, M.I. (2005) Rehabilitation of Jointed Portland Cement Concrete Pavements: SPS-6 Initial Evaluation and Analysis. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-169, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  67. Selezneva, O.I., Jiang, Y.J., and Tayabji, S.D. (2002) Preliminary Evaluation and Analysis of LTPP Faulting Data—Final Report. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-076, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  68. Jiang, Y.J. and Darter, M.I. (2005) Structural Factors of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements: SPS­2—Initial Evaluation and Analysis. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-167, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  69. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D. (2001) LTPP Data Analysis: Factors Affecting Pavement Smoothness. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  70. Simpson, A.L., Emmanuel, O., Pendleton, O., and Lee, Y. (1994) Sensitivity Analyses for Selected Pavement Distresses. Strategic Highway Research Program, Report No. SHRP-P393, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  71. Mladenovic, G., Jiang, Y.J. and Darter, M.I. (2002) Study of Environmental Effects in the Absence of the Heavy Load­SPS­8—Initial Evaluation and Analysis. Report No. FHWA-RD-02-087, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  72. Hall, K.T., Darter, M.I., Hoerner, T.H., and Khazanovich, L. (1997) LTPP Data Analysis Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete Pavement Performance Prediction. Report No. FHWA-RD-96198, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  73. Stubstad, R.N. (2002) LTPP Data Analysis: Variations in Pavement Design Inputs. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  74. Harrigan, T. E. (2002) “Performance of Pavement Subsurface Drainage,” Research Results Digest, No. 268. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  75. Titus-Glover, L., Owusu-Antwi, E.B., and Darter, M.I. (1998) Design and Construction of PCC Pavements Volume III: Improved PCC Performance Models. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-113, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  76. Rada, G.R., Wu, C.L., and Bhandari, R.K., Law, P.C.S. (1999) Study of LTPP Distress Data Variability, Volume 1. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-074, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  77. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2013) Transportation Asset Management Guide—A Focus on Implementation. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC.

  78. Houston, W.N., Mamlouck, M.S., and Perera, R.W.S. (1992) “Laboratory Versus Nondestructive Testing for Pavement Design,” Journal of Transportation Engineering 118(2), p. 202–232, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  79. LTPP Customer Support Services. Detailed data and results from this study are available through LTPP Customer Support Services by phone at 202–493–3035 or by email at ltppinfo@fhwa.dot.gov.

  80. Miller, S.G. and Bellinger, W.J. (2003) Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. Publication No. FHWA-RD-03-031, Washington, DC.

  81. Dawson T.A., Baladi, G., Beach, A., Dean, C., Haider, S., and Chatti, K. (2012) “Impact of Three State Practices on Effectiveness of Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlay,” Transportation Research Record 2292, 1, p. 52–61, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  82. Federal Highway Administration. (2010) Local Calibration of the MEPDG Using Pavement Management Systems, Final Report Volume I. Report No. FHWA-HIF-11-026, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  83. Dawson, T. (2008) Backcalculated Subgrade Resilient Modulus Design Values for the State of Michigan. Master’s Thesis. Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI.

  84. Elseifi, M.A., Gaspard, K., Wilke, P.W., Zhang, Z., and Hegab, A. (2015) Evaluation and Validation of a Model to Predict Pavement Structural Number Using Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) Data. Transportation Research Board, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  85. Asphalt Institute. (1983) Asphalt Overlays for Highway and Street Rehabilitation. Manual No. MS17, Lexington, KY.

  86. Lukanen E.O., Stubstad, R., and Briggs, R. (2000) Temperature Predictions and Adjustment Factors for Asphalt Pavement. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-085, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

 

 

 

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101