Skip to content

P3 VALUE 2.0 Webinars
Session 3: Project Delivery Benefit-Cost Analysis

February 22, 2016
Related Materials

Instructors

Patrick DeCorla-Souza
Patrick DeCorla-Souza
P3 Program Manager
Center for Innovative Finance Support

Marcel Ham
Marcel Ham
Vice President
IMG/Rebel

P3-VALUE 2.0 Webinars

  • P3: Public Private Partnership
  • P3-VALUE 2.0: Analytical tool to help practitioners understand processes used to quantitatively evaluate P3 options
  • This is the fourth webinar on P3-VALUE
    • P3 Evaluation Overview (January 25, 2016)
    • Value for Money Analysis (February 8, 2016)
    • VfM Exercise Review (February 16, 2016)
    • Project Delivery Benefit-Cost Analysis (today)
    • Risk Valuation
    • Financial Viability Assessment

Webinar Outline

Part 1 Introduction

Part 2 Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Process

Part 3 P3 Delivery Economic Differences

Part 4 Benefit-Cost Analysis using P3-VALUE 2.0

Summary

Part 1 - Introduction

Types of Project Delivery EvaluationTypes of Project Delivery Evaluation

View full-size flow chart showing Types of Project Delivery Evalution

Financial vs. Economic Evaluation

  • Financial Evaluation
    • Considers financial elements only, i.e., "cash flows"
    • Perspective is that of the procuring agency
  • Economic Efficiency Evaluation
    • Considers full range of costs and benefits to society
    • Perspective is that of society as a whole

Financial Evaluation Questions

  • Is the project affordable to the public agency?
  • Will P3 procurement enhance the financial position of the public sponsor?

Economic Efficiency Questions

  • Does the project yield benefits to society that exceed the costs to society?
    • What is the best project design alternative?
    • When should a project be undertaken?
  • Will P3 delivery increase net benefits to society compared with conventional procurement?

P3-VALUE 2.0 Tool Structure

P3-VALUE 2.0 Tool Structure

View full-size P3-VALUE 2.0 Tool Structure flow chart

Accounting for Costs

Project Cost Benefit-Cost Analysis Value for Money
Capital cost
O&M cost
Risk
Public transaction costs
Private transaction costs (winning bid)
Private transaction costs (losing bids)

Accounting for Other Social Impacts

Other Social Impacts Benefit-Cost Analysis Value for Money
User Benefits    
Travel time cost
Incident/accident cost
Vehicle operation cost
Accident cost
Externalities    
Emission costs

Accounting for Financing

Purely Financial Transactions, i.e., Economic Transfers Benefit-Cost Analysis Value for Money
Revenues
Taxes
Debt and equity contributions
Interest and dividend payments

Real vs. Nominal Values

  Benefit-Cost Analysis Value for Money
Dollar values Real Nominal
Discount rate for NPV calculations Real Nominal

Test Your Knowledge

True or False

  • Financial evaluation considers the full range of costs and benefits to society.

Questions?

Submit a question using the chat box

Part 2 - Benefit-Cost Analysis Process

Benefit-Cost Evaluation Process

Benefit-Cost Evaluation Process

View full-size Benefit-Cost Evaluation Process graphic

Project Delivery BCA Framework

Project Delivery BCA Framework

View full-size Project Delivery BCA Framework chart

Step 1: Project Benefits/Costs

Delayed Conventional Delivery compared to No Build

Delayed Conventional Delivery compared to No Build

View full-size Step 1 chart

Step 2: Impacts of Funding Constraints

Delayed Conventional Delivery (Delayed PSC) compared to Conventional Delivery (PSC)

Step 2 Impacts of Funding Constraints

View full-size Step 2 chart

Step 3: P3 Delivery Effects

Conventional Delivery (PSC) compared to P3

Conventional Delivery (PSC) compared to P3

View full-size Step 3 chart

P3 Timing Impacts

P3 can delay or accelerate project:

  • Complex P3 contracting may delay project start
  • P3 concessionaire may be financially incentivized to shorten construction period (acceleration)

Impacts of acceleration are:

  • Higher NPV of costs due to effect of discounting
  • Higher NPV of benefits due to earlier opening to traffic

P3 Quality Impacts

Benefit Category Estimation based on:
Pavement quality adjustment to vehicle operating costs
  • Difference in International Roughness Index (IRI)
Delays during construction due to lane unavailability
  • Differences in number of days and hours of lane closures
Delays during operation due to lane unavailability
  • Differences in number of days and hours of lane closures
Delays during operation due to incidents
  • Differences in effect on average speed
Faster traffic ramp-up due to P3 innovations & outreach activities
  • Difference in traffic volumes during ramp-up period

Economic Costs

Cost item Delayed PSC
($M)
PSC
($M)
P3
($M)
Planning and preparation costs      
Procurement costs      
Design and engineering costs      
Construction costs      
O&M costs      
Major maintenance costs      
Contingencies      
Base variability      
Systematic risks and uncertainties      
Total costs for Build Alternative      
No Build cost savings      
Total economic costs      

Economic Benefits

Benefit item Delayed PSC
($M)
PSC
($M)
P3
($M)
Travel time savings      
Vehicle operating cost savings
Fuel cost savings      
Environmental benefits
Safety benefits      
Other benefits
Disbenefits during construction      
P3 quality impacts      
Economic benefits - existing users      
Consumer surplus - "new" users
Producer surplus - "new" users      
Total economic benefits      

Project Delivery BCA Output

Delivery models compared to No Build

Delivery models compared to No Build

View full-size chart

Perspective Considerations

Perspective Financial Analysis (VfM) Economic Analysis (PDBCA)
Agency Costs to Agency's balance sheet Agency costs plus societal benefits
State Costs to State State costs plus societal benefits
National Societal costs Societal costs and benefits (true BCA)

Test Your Knowledge

True or False

Benefits from project acceleration may not necessarily be attributable to P3 delivery.

Questions

Submit a question using the chat box

Part 3 - P3 Delivery Economic Differences

Factors Affecting P3 Differences

  1. Project characteristics
    • Size
    • Complexity
  2. Context characteristics
    • Institutional capacity
    • Market
  3. Procurement characteristics
    • Agreement
    • Conventional delivery efficiency

Impacts of P3 Differences

Costs & Beneftis flow chart

View full-size flow chart

Differences Relative to VfM Analysis

  • Included costs:
    • Only financing fees
    • Lifecycle performance risk under P3
    • Uncompensated costs of losing bidders
  • Not included:
    • Toll revenues (and uncertainty adjustment)
    • Financing - equity, debt, and repayments
  • Benefits:
    • User benefits - travel time, travel cost (including vehicle operating costs), accident cost differences
      • Existing users
      • New users
    • Externalities - emissions cost differences

Sources of Benefits

  • Improved quality of service:
    • Earlier construction completion
    • Pavement ride quality
    • Work zone practices
    • Incident response

Benefits to Users

Earlier construction completion: Increase in years of benefits

Chart - Earlier construction completion: Increase in years of benefits

View full-size chart

  • Pavement ride quality: International Roughness Index vs. fuel and non-fuel cost
  Fuel cost % adjustment Non-fuel cost % adjustment
Parameters >> 2 axle 4+ axle 2 axle 4+ axle
IRI % % % %
0 97.05% 96.07% 100.00% 100.00%
25 97.68% 96.53% 100.00% 100.00%
50 98.00% 97.04% 100.00% 100.00%
75 98.24% 97.53% 100.00% 100.00%
100 98.46% 97.99% 100.00% 100.00%
150 99.52% 99.31% 101.65% 101.84%
200 100.53% 100.74% 105.20% 105.78%
250 101.95% 102.57% 108.76% 109.73%
300 103.39% 104.68% 112.31% 113.67%
350 105.01% 107.03% 115.86% 117.62%
400 107.16% 109.96% 119.41% 121.57%
450 109.31% 112.89% 122.96% 125.51%
  • Reduce Speed sign
Work zone practices: Estimated 45% speed reduction in work zones, applied:
    • To traffic in section affected
    • For duration affected, on the days affected
      * based on SHRP 2 Project L08.
    • Incident response: Speed reduction relative to congested speed estimated based on Urban Mobility Report (Texas Transportation Institute)
Level of congestion Daily traffic volume per lane Speed reduction factor
Uncongested Under 15,000 5%
Medium 15,001 -17,500 5%
Heavy 17,501 - 20,000 9%
Severe 20,001 - 25,000 18%
Extreme Over 25,000 23%

Benefits to "New" Users

Rule of Half

Chart - Benefits to "New" Users

View full-size chart

Test Your Knowledge

  • Which of the following may be different under a P3:
    • Construction completion
    • Pavement ride quality
    • Impacts of work zone practices on travel time
    • Incident response time
    • All of the above

Questions?

Submit a question using the chat box

Part 4 - Project Delivery Benefit-Cost Analysis using P3-VALUE 2.0

FHWA's P3-VALUE 2.0

Flow chart -  FHWA's P3-VALUE 2.0

View full-size flow chart of the P3-VALUE 2.0 elements

Training Modules

Training Modules list

Training Navigator User Interface

User Interface

View full-size Navigator User Interface

Demonstration of PDBCA Module

Please stand by as we open the Excel file

Questions?

Submit a question using the chat box

Webinar Summary

Webinar Recap

Part 1 Introduction

Part 2 Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Process

Part 3 P3 Delivery Economic Differences

Part 4 Benefit-Cost Analysis using P3-VALUE 2.0

Tool and References

Upcoming P3-VALUE Training

  • February 29 (12:30pm) BCA Exercise review
  • March 7 (2:00pm) Risk Valuation (2:00pm)
  • March 21 (2:00pm) Financial Viability Assessment

To access the Exercise Review webinar, please use the following link and telephone number:

Link: https://connectdot.connectsolutions.com/p3

Telephone: 1-888-363-4749, Passcode: 6139168#

Resources

FHWA's Center for Innovative Finance Support Website: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/

P3 Website: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/

Contact Information

Patrick DeCorla-Souza
P3 Program Manager
Center for Innovative Finance Support
Federal Highway Administration (202) 366-4076
Patrick.DeCorla-Souza@dot.gov

Questions?

Submit a question using the chat box

back to top