Skip to content

Publications

An Integrated Approach to Sustainable Roadside Design and Restoration

Previous Chapter « Table of Contents » Next Chapter

2. Principles and Process

This guidebook identifies four of the major disciplines involved in roadside design and provides strategies to consider in enhancing sustainability. The strategies are intended to be integrated into an agency's existing design process, rather than as a separate set of recommendations.1 Sustainable solutions should be incorporated early in the planning and design processes in order to maximize their value.

2.1 Guiding Principles in Roadside Design

CONTEXT-SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS (CSS)
CSS is a collaborative, interdisciplinary, holistic approach to the development of transportation projects (FHWA, www.contextsensitivesolutions.org). It involves all stakeholders, including community members, elected officials, interest groups, and affected local, state, and federal agencies. CSS puts project needs and both agency and community values on a level playing field and con- siders all trade-offs in decision making. CSS should be incorporated into decisions related to the roadside - not simply for aesthetics but for the overall function and character of the facility.

The detailed guidance within this guidebook will vary based on the unique context of the project and type of project (small-scale to large-scale). Overarching recommendations to integrate sustainability into the roadside design process (regardless of scale) include:

  • Adopt an integrated approach to roadside management (see Context-Sensitive Solutions at right). Create a process through which to coordinate with other disciplines.
    • The process through which meetings and communication best occurs will vary by agency. The key is to ensure that this consistent communication across disciplines happens early and often.
  • Communicate with stakeholders about their goals, priorities, expectations, and perceptions of the roadside environment.
    • Engaging stakeholders is essential. Project stakeholders may include federal agencies, state departments of transportation (DOT), local jurisdictions, local residents and business owners, recreational users, and other interested parties. Coordination with interested stakeholders should be initiated early in the design process to develop a shared vision and sustainability goals for the project.
  • Educate staff, contractors, and other personnel involved in all phases of a project (design, construction, operations, maintenance) about the project's sustainability goals and implementation actions.
    • Agency staff need to become the champions for integrating sustainable practices and ensuring that successes are carried forward into future projects. Similarly, the contractor needs to be a partner in ensuring that practices are implemented in the field.
  • Promote sustainability awareness and education.
    • Implement a public outreach process to educate roadway users and nearby residents/businesses about the project's sustainability features and the benefits of sustainable design.
  • Plan for the life of a project; compare the full lifecycle costs of different strategies and approaches.
    • Roadway design and construction decisions are complex and interwoven. In recent years, infrastructure rating systems have evolved with an emphasis on measuring transportation sustainability. Criteria within these systems pertain to the roadside environment. In addition, specific programs, such as FHWA's RealCost software, can help calculate not only construction costs but long-term maintenance costs of different choices.2
  • Consider project impacts within the context of global considerations, such as climate change.
    • Climate variability is linked to transportation decision-making. The difficulty for the science and transportation communities is in accurately projecting the extent to which climate will change. In turn, the projections need to help determine how to best protect and adapt transportation infrastructure to withstand the impacts associated with an increase in climate variability.

INFRASTRUCTURE RATING SYSTEMS
A number of green infrastructure rating systems have evolved over the past few years to measure the concept of sustainable transportation. Each rating system has different applications and review processes. FHWA has created the web-based FHWA Sustainable Highways Self-Evaluation Tool, referred to as INVEST (Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool). INVEST represents a collection of best practices to measure sustainability during the system planning, project development, and operations and maintenance phases. Many of these credits extend beyond the planning phase to the roadside restoration phase, including lifecycle cost analysis, habitat restoration, protection of riparian habitats, ecological connectivity, recycle and reuse of materials, contextual site vegetation, and others.

CLIMATE VARIABILITY IMPACTS

The idea that the Earth's climate is changing has become widely accepted within the scientific community, and there is strong evidence that many changes to the climate are already taking place. Rising sea levels, increased average global temperatures, increased heat waves, and an increased intensity of storm events have already been observed and are projected to become more extreme over the course of the 21st century.

Long-term changes in climate conditions could significantly affect how transportation facilities are designed, constructed, operated, and maintained. Sea-level rise could threaten coastal infrastructure, such as coastal highways, railroads, and ports. Extended heat waves could cause pavement to buckle. Increased frequency of the freeze/thaw cycles has the potential to significantly affect pavement lifespan and designs. Strategies to address climate change include assessing the risks and impacts that projected climate variability could have on existing assets and how climate variability could be incorporated into the planning and design of new assets. (Assessing the Impact of Climate Variability on Transportation Infrastructure, 2012).

2.2 Roadside Considerations in Each Project Phase

There are four major phases to roadway design, which are described in greater detail in the companion to this guidebook titled Integrated Approach for Building Sustainable Roads (2013):

  • Planning and Programming
  • Design
  • Construction
  • Operations and Maintenance

The four phases are shown in Figure 2-1. Sustainability considerations for roadsides need to be part of each project phase. A set of recommendations to enhance sustainability are included under each phase below.

Phase 1: Planning and Programming

  • Understand the project context. Evaluate and document the attributes of the roadside environment that make it unique.
  • Evaluate existing conditions. Existing roadside vegetation, hydraulic patterns, topography, and aesthetic features need to be understood in the planning phase.
  • Develop roadside sustainability goals. Site opportunities and constraints must feed into the development of sustainability goals for the roadside. Goals should be realistic and a system should be developed to track progress.

Phase 2: Design

  • Design roadside elements to meet sustainability goals. Test and implement innovative practices to meet sustainability goals.

Phase 3: Construction

  • Revisit and revise the roadside maintenance plan. Maintenance plans should be "living documents" that continue to be revisited and updated as the project moves through design, construction, and operations.
  • Minimize construction impacts and mimic natural conditions. The construction process should focus on minimizing impacts to the roadside environment, particularly with site establishment and grading, erosion, dust, noise, and air quality impacts.

Phase 4: Maintenance and Operations

  • Track maintenance activities. Tasks, responsibilities, and time frames need to be identified in the construction process and then tracked through operations. Detailed information should be collected to understand the successes and limitations of different sustainability strategies.
  • Modify strategies in the field. The implementation of best practices in sustainability should remain flexible enough to be modified if needed during operations.

View larger version of Figure 2-1

Figure 2-1: Steps to roadside sustainability through the project lifecycle

Footnotes

1 The FHWA Office of Federal Lands Highway design process is governed by the FLH Project Design and Development Manual (PDDM), 2011. References to sections of the PDDM are made throughout this guidebook. https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/design/pddm/

2. FHWA RealCost software is available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/lccasoft.cfm.

 

Previous Chapter « Table of Contents » Next Chapter

Explore CTIP
Subscribe

Stay up to date

Sign up for announcements on grant opportunities, training, and webinars.

Subscribe now →

Stay connected with
Center for Local Aid Support

Sign up to receive the CLAS quarterly e-Newsletter.

Training Partnership Guide

Download PDF for information on access to training opportunities: Partnership Guide.

back to top